Or maybe, they fired her for being visibly pregnant, which wasn't uncommon at the time. Of course, they would never put that in writing.
First two minutes of this video.
Or maybe, they fired her for being visibly pregnant, which wasn't uncommon at the time. Of course, they would never put that in writing.
Try watching the video, blakehole.
You're very gullible
Look, I don't particularly like Warren, but this is pretty old by now and already debunked as not a lie.
You can still hate/dislike Warren for completely reasonable reasons, there's no actual point in making up. This goes the same for GOP politicians.
BTW, that 2007 video is edited, there's a missing part. Here's the transcript for that question:
For a while? I mean, you actually pursued that career?
I actually did. I was married at nineteen and graduated from college after I'd married, and my first year post-graduation I worked in a public school system with the children with disabilities. I did that for a year, and then that summer I didn't have the education courses, so I was on an "emergency certificate," it was called. I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, "I don't think this is going to work out for me." I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, "What am I going to do?" My husband's view of it was, "Stay home. We have children, we'll have more children, you'll love this." And I was very restless about it.
http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/peo...rren-con1.html
A Trumpista trying to complain about lying is just precious.
What convinced you?
Did I name this the Blakehole lash out thread?
Wow, you can post googled links.
Well, a co-worker came out and backed up the contention. I mean, it's an unverifiable claim regardless, as there's nothing in writing, and it's entirely plausible her perception about the issue changed over 12 years (it's not like discrimination was a hit back in '07).
And, ultimately, there's legitimate politics/policy arguments to beat down Warren. I'm not even claiming she doesn't lie, this just looks like a reach. When you have to start cutting off videos, it always looks like a reach.
Backing up what I'm talking about. You're welcome.
You did jack .
Oh I did. You don't have to like it.
You're welcome.
You're being intentionally thick. Anyone watching the video clip I put can tell that Pocohantas told two different stories.
You do yourself a disservice by taking such a disingenuous stance. This has became pretty common for you though.
I don't understand why you seek validation over this. You know it's an unverifiable claim (there's nothing in written), the video has been edited to omit the fact that she told back then too she was pregnant, and there's frankly no reason to believe she was lying about this (particularly after a co-worker backed up the story).
So, let's say your opinion is, regardless of all of the above, that she's lying. That's perfectly respectable. I won't tell you you're wrong, it's an opinion. I could even go further and ask you why you think she is lying, despite all of the above, but, it's really immaterial: I don't think you posted this because it changed your mind about Warren, or you think it will change anybody's mind about Warren, and I don't think whoever edited that video was also hoping to change anybody's mind. This is the prototypical confirmation bias video.
What I was explaining, is that there's way more solid reasons to dislike Warren. Her populist positions come to mind. It's a much more entertaining and meaty discussion than this, simply because there's no way to prove this one way or another.
She was a non-credentialed 'emergency' subs ute. She never even had the position. She was filling a vacancy. She was an interim teacher. The pregnancy was not the reason. She got her hand caught in the cookie jar. You should just come to terms that Elizabeth Warren is amateur hour. It'll save you a lot of pain later on.
but he's got a youtube though. . .
Who would make her pregnant ?
well she is not an underage girl you can urinate on so not you.
Her job at the school is not in dispute. Not in the video you posted. Not in the articles that tell the story. Is your claim she lied about having the job in the first place?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)