Reply With Quote
Equal protection is what it is. You want her to be prosecuted differently. Partisan nonsense is strong in you.
"Christian, Conservative, Patriot and not afraid?"
How brave!
Equal protection is what it is. You want her to be prosecuted differently. Partisan nonsense is strong in you.
FBI Director revises stance, says none of Hillary Clinton’s emails were classified at the time
The day after the Director of the FBI claimed that Hillary Clinton received classified emails on her personal email server before concluding that she violated no laws and would face no charges,
a State Department spokesman contradicted him, stating that the emails in question had been improperly marked to begin with and therefore she did nothing wrong (something we reported last night).
This morning, as the Director was being interrogated by House Republicans over his findings, one of the Democrats on the committee pointed out the discrepancy. This prompted him to revise his stance on the matter.
Even as the Republicans spent the day suggesting to FBI Director James Comey’s face that he either failed to properly look into Hillary Clinton’s use of email or outright rigged the matter in her favor, he confidently shot down their conspiracies one after another, likely causing them to regret having hauled him in to begin with. But it was a House Democrat who finally asked Comey about the new State Department assertion that the emails in question were improperly marked.
The FBI Director responded by revising and clarifying his assessment, acknowledging that of the three email in question (originally reported as two emails by the New York Times), there were errors their classification markings which had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton and therefore could not have been her fault.
This came as he also made that clear Clinton voluntarily cooperated with every aspect of the inquiry, and that to the best of his knowledge, she was truthful throughout the matter.
https://control.phone.com/voip/block...zzD43Tzo72B3LZ
Repugs ed up!
Comey ed!
Comey did get in his slander in his protocol-violating press conference, so surely the VRWC will have extremely lucrative jobs for him after he leaves govt.
Do any of you want someone who the FBI says is "extremely careless with classified information" to be president of these sates?FBI recommends no criminal charges in Clinton email probe
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...mepage%2Fstory
Are Hillary lovers really that blind to the possibilities?
Reductio ad absurdum from the resident simpleton. How droll.
How long have you been sucking her balls?
Now binary logic from the simpleton. Not a fan of the Clintons but in this case you and your GOP overlords are grasping at straws.
Your desperation is showing.
Idiot.
I only dislike the GOP a little less the the demonrats.
haven't you figured it out yet?
They are both corrupt!
You say this yet in every discussion you support the GOP candidate and their policies. You make up derisive nicknames boutox-style for the dems and not the GOP. You vote and campaign here for the GOP. People have made up nicknames like Republican Cobra and the like to satirize your method.
You still believe a 'solar burp' and subsequent atmospheric oxidation could have explained your Bible stories?
Your pathetic extrapolation of facts only show how utterly stupid you are.
My dis'ing the democrats does not mean I support the republicans.
Please stop acting like a 9 year old.
Sure thing Republican Cobra
LOL...
Pathetic Fuzz...
Please show me when I have actually supported republicans.
Republican administration's war crimes are being covered up and Republican Cobra says "See, this is bull !!"
Two years ago, I received a file and printed some of my own money. I never used it like it was meant to be used. This year, I'm going to buy stamps like crazy, and send this money to republican members of congress, and various RNC donation locations. Here is the money:
I also plan to send a letter to the republican senator of my state, Gordon Smith. It will go something like this:
Dear senator Smith;
I have always voted for you in the past. I wish to thank-you for making me decide to register as a republican. For more than twenty years, my party affiliation is listed as "not affiliated." As an independent, I normally vote republican, but have occasionally voted democrat, libertarian, and cons ution party. Because of your position on not enforcing border control and granting amnesty, I will register as a republican so I can vote against you for this upcoming primary.
Then of course there is this thread where you are regurgitating the justification for voting GOP based on reductio ad absurdum stupidity.
It's all you ever do here.
LOL...
How do any of those show I actively support republicans? You should read them carefully.
Do you realize you included a post that contains this:
Because of your position on not enforcing border control and granting amnesty, I will register as a republican so I can vote against you for this upcoming primary.
My God, you stupidity continues to make me laugh!
The one about printing money was joke money, maybe it was the $3 Bill. Don't remember, as the link is no longer laid.
Man...
You really take the cake in stupidity!
It show you voting in the GOP primary simpleton.
This really isn't for your benefit. This reminds me when you claimed I couldn't find posts of you being blatantly racist.
comey changes stance on classified email and finds millions of dollars in his account
How does that make you feel?
he has plenty of money he is close in most state polls except for California
he has hardy done anything yet against Hillary
the rebublicans polications do not know what to do because the people have spoken but they are getting paychecks from lobbyist and trump will not get bought
democrats want Hillary because she stands for the democrat lobbyist
trump unlike most running for office knows how to use the media and work the media he is getting more coverage then anyone else
Clinton is spending a half a million dollars or more a day on tv adds she is so bought
Polls?
Only the Repug inhouse polling bull house Rasmussen has Trash leading
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...nton-5491.html
Democrats Surging As Hillary Clinton Is Destroying Donald Trump 74%-16% With Latinos
Donald Trump is a symptom of a much larger disease.
One-third of self-identified Latino Republicans said that they would support Hillary Clinton over Trump.
There aren’t enough while male voters in the electorate to make up for the overwhelming numbers of other voters who are fleeing Trump.
The structural elements of this election are not moving in Trump’s direction.
Latino voters have been alienated by the Republican Party and Trump.
Hillary Clinton and Democrats have done an outstanding job of making it clear that Latinos are welcome, and their voices are heard in the Democratic Party.
Contrary to Trump’s claims, Latinos don’t love him.
In fact, they are close to hating the presumptive GOP nominee.
Republicans are fighting a demographic war that they can’t win.
With each poll, it is clear that Donald Trump may be swept into the dustbin of history as Latino voters reject his bigoted politics of
yesteryear.http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07/11/democrats-surging-hillary-clinton-destroying-donald-trump-74-16-latinos.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed &utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Polit icus+USA+%29
So Trash loses badly in Latinos, women, blacks, LGBT, 18-34, college educated, and very probably independents.
Trump wins white high school grads and dropouts, and old white men who are pissed that their income has been essentially flat for 35 years.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-11-2016 at 08:21 PM.
It really sucks when promising the income of hard working people buys you votes.
Top Intelligence Official Denies Paul Ryan's Request to Block Hillary Clinton From Classified Briefings
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/top-i...55&cid=abcn_fb
'Gag' order: FBI confirms special secrecy agreements for agents in Clinton email probe
The FBI has confirmed to a senior Republican senator that agents were sworn to secrecy -- and subject to lie detector tests -- in the Hillary Clinton email probe, an extensive measure one former agent said could have a "chilling effect."
A July 1 letter sent by a senior deputy to FBI Director James Comey to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, detailed the restrictions on agents. The letter, reviewed by Fox News, confirmed agents signed a "Case Briefing Acknowledgement" which says the disclosure of information is "strictly prohibited" without prior approval, and those who sign are subject to lie detector tests.
"The purpose of this form is to maintain an official record of persons knowledgeable of a highly sensitive Federal Bureau of Investigation counterintelligence investigation," the agreement attached to the Grassley letter reads, "....I (FBI agent) also understand that, due to the nature and sensitivity of this investigation, compliance with these restrictions may be subject to verification by polygraph examination."
The measures show the extent to which the bureau has gone to keep additional details of the politically sensitive case from going public. While Comey has provided some information on why the FBI did not opt to pursue charges, Attorney General Loretta Lynch repeatedly ducked questions on specifics of the case at a House hearing Tuesday.
A recently retired FBI agent, who declined to speak on the record, citing the sensitivity of the matter, said a "Case Briefing Acknowledgement" is reserved for "the most sensitive of sensitive cases," and can have a "chilling effect" on agents, who understand "it comes from the very top and that there has to be a tight lid on the case."
The former agent said the agreements can also contribute to "group think" because investigators cannot bounce ideas off other agents, only those within a small circle.
Grassley first wrote to the FBI Director February 4 after a Fox News report that agents were asked to sign additional non-disclosure agreements. In his response to the senator, the FBI's Assistant Director, Office of Congressional Affairs, Stephen D. Kelly, said “this was not a unique cir stance” and agents "may from time to time be asked to sign similar forms.”
The July letter also says that the purpose of the agreement was two-fold: "to maintain an official record of all persons knowledgeable of this highly unusual investigation, and to remind individuals of their obligations to protect classified and sensitive information." The letter states "no one refused to sign" or “raised any questions or concerns.”
Comey said last week more than 100 classified emails were sent or received by Hillary Clinton, including some at the Top Secret level, which would require agents to have the necessary clearance to review and investigate. Some of the intelligence came from the U.S. government's most closely held programs, known as Special Access Programs, or SAP and included human spying.
The "Case Briefing Acknowledgement" is more evidence that the probe was always a serious criminal investigation, and never a "security review" or "security inquiry" as described by Clinton and her campaign team.
Responding one day after the FBI director said he would not recommend criminal charges, Grassley pointed to Comey's conclusions that a limited number of emails had classified markings, thousands of work related emails were not turned over by Clinton to the State Department despite a sworn declaration to a federal court and her public assurances, as well as "potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information."
"In light of all these inconsistencies, it is even more troubling that the FBI tried to gag its agents with a non-disclosure agreement on this matter, in violation of whistleblower protection statutes," Grassley said in the strongly worded letter. "...you indicated that agents working on this case were required to sign a non-disclosure agreement that failed to exempt protected whistleblowing. Only after I wrote to you did you advise your FBI agents that they are still free to speak with Congress regarding waste, fraud, and abuse."
The "Case Briefing Acknowledgement Addendum" provided to Senator Grassley after the initial FBI response July 1 makes clear the agreement does not supersede or conflict with "communications to Congress" and "the reporting to an Inspector General of a violation, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or….any other whistleblower protection."
Grassley also noted the timing of the FBI's response five months after his original request for information on the NDAs, with a partial response July 1, and full response on July 5 2016, the same day the FBI made a public recommendation at bureau headquarters against criminal charges.
The New York Post first reported that the "Case Briefing Acknowledgement" was signed by the Clinton email agents, citing anonymous sources, but the Grassley letter is believed to be the first public acknowledgement by the FBI, and includes a sample copy of the non-disclosure agreement.
Grassley’s letter is wide ranging, and beyond the non-disclosure agreements, requests a response by July 20 to questions including whether, after Bill Clinton and Lynch’s June 28 meeting on a Phoenix airport tarmac, there is no need for a special counsel. He also wanted to know about the FBI’s reported agreement that some questions would be off limits for Clinton’s personal attorney Cheryl Mills, and whether the FBI or Justice Department raised concerns that several of Clinton’s associates used the same attorneys to represent them in the investigation.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...ail-probe.html
Repugs been doing it for decades.
This year maybe some of their ignorant, lied-to, all-emotions/no-brains base realized what the Repug game has been: ignoring the base's economic objectives.
Now they vote for a protest candidate piece of Trash lying, con man with orange-dyed hair and skin.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-14-2016 at 03:26 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
