Reply With Quote
See, you're not even very good at it
You are though....by the definition that you've decided is true, you're absolutely a troll. You start threads about other posters, you're nearly always in the middle of it when there is a multi page argument about nothing, you're constantly baiting people that aren't even in the thread you're posting in, and on and on and on and on.
You're even at the same level of humor as the very people you find unoriginal and lacking creativity. The fact that you only post under one name (allegedly) doesn't help your case either because you're ALWAYS doing what you profess to hate.
Practice what you preach, step away from the Internet and stop trolling...then I will stop "discussing" anything with you and you won't have to deal with me ever again....
See, you're not even very good at it
You first.You are though....by the definition that you've decided is true, you're absolutely a troll. You start threads about other posters, you're nearly always in the middle of it when there is a multi page argument about nothing, you're constantly baiting people that aren't even in the thread you're posting in, and on and on and on and on.
You're even at the same level of humor as the very people you find unoriginal and lacking creativity. The fact that you only post under one name (allegedly) doesn't help your case either because you're ALWAYS doing what you profess to hate.
Practice what you preach, step away from the Internet and stop trolling...then I will stop "discussing" anything with you and you won't have to deal with me ever again....
I plan to keep posting upstairs because I love the Spurs and basketball.
Down here I have curtailed my bashing, not trolling, quite significantly.
I even started a thread that I only posted if at the very beginning and allowing the trolls to have at themselves.
The other subjects I am always willing to have a good discussion withdecent posters as long as they give me the same courtesy.
At the very beginning of this discussion with Random I explained to him that I COULD not debate this subject, but that I could discuss it.
What is your problem with that?
You come across as trolling.
Do you not understand this, or are you just dense?
You fail to realize that I gave you and Random the benefit of the doubt. I have read many of your trolling posts when that is your childish game, but I still tried to give you both the benefit of the doubt in the interest of civility so we could have a discussion.
The areas that became a debate was over semantics, or didn't you get that? Random did.
And I was genuinely still trying to discuss it with you even after it became obvious that all you seemed to really want to do was troll me.
So who was being the adult here?
God you're dumb...go look and see who pointed out that you guys were having an argument over semantics.
Yes you are.
You're also a huge liar.
You have absolutely no room to talk.
You are going away the biggest liar, and fool, on ST
And you calling me a liar is the hugest vote of confidence that I tell the truth, on here.
I already explained this to you twice but you are just too dense and contrary to get it.
I explained that the "debate" or argument that our discussion gravitated into centered around the "paradox" issue.
Are you really this dense, or is it that you have a problem with understanding things?
I stand amazed at your level of ignorance. It rivals blake in that regard, and I wouldn't be proud of that if I were you.
you have no clue just how re ed this logic is, do you.
You literally are a re .
No surprise that the ST village idiot troll does not understand.
That is why everyone on here always has to dumb things down for you.
Yes, you are still clueless.
Nothing to see here folks.
Move along.
You have a perfectly useless concept of God. Defining something as "undefinable" is just silly.
You are welcome to be as silly as you want I guess, but don't represent such things as rational. They aren't. I would reject that as literally being delusional.
uh oh. xmas gunna call you a troll now.
Not something I woudl take seriously.
Quite frankly, I am a bit more worried about Ukraine and South China sea.
The killing of 23 americans by Russian backed sepratists, using Russian surface to air missiles is a -storm that worries the out of me.
sounds like a Tom Clancy book
You are always welcome to your opinion.
Just remember, it is merely an "opinion". And it has absolutely nothing to do with "rationality", no, it is simply an opinion, no more, and no less.
More lies as per usual.
You're probably going to lie and say that I did not offer you a truce next. and you refused, but the proof is still in the threads, no matter how you try to twist it and distort it.
Your loss. You have only yourself to blame. Go ahead and lie about that too.
You are always welcome to your opinion.
Just remember, it is merely an "opinion". And it has absolutely nothing to do with "rationality", no, it is simply an opinion, no more, and no less.
More lies as per usual.
You're probably going to lie and say that I did not offer you a truce next. and you refused, but the proof is still in the threads, no matter how you try to twist it and distort it.
Your loss. You have only yourself to blame. Go ahead and lie about that too.
If you believe something is true, when it is in fact false, that is the definition of delusional.de·lu·sion·al [dih-loo-zhuh-nl] Show IPA
adjective
1.
having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions: Senators who think they will get agreement on a comprehensive tax bill are delusional.
2.
Psychiatry. maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts, usually as a result of mental illness: He was so delusional and paranoid that he thought everybody was conspiring against him.
You have no evidence to believe X is true, or to independently verify it.
I think you had best go and recheck your definition of "delusional" again because it isn't even close.
Maybe in the "Dictionary of RandomGuy" it is, but that is all.
Feel free to present your alternative.I think you had best go and recheck your definition of "delusional" again because it isn't even close.
Maybe in the "Dictionary of RandomGuy" it is, but that is all.
Define delusional.
LOL i believe in evolution i do. but man,when i see this, you might as well put Santa Clause as the last man on hereI agree
How many dictionary definitions do you want? Will one suffice? Or do I need to quote a bunch?
Just one you will accept. If you don't like my reality-based definition, feel free to subs ute one of your own. I"m good.
Seriously, you are too stupid to understand the theory you are criticizing.
If you weren't so dumb, and or lazy, and would even bother learning the theory you are trying to troll, I might bother.
I will take it all back, and apologize, if you can explain why phylogeny, using concepts of evolution, so closely predicts the fossil record and what is found when we examine genetic lineages?
If you can't, GTFO.
Okay, I took the first one I found from the Merriam-Webster dictionary:
de·lu·sion
noun \di-ˈlü-zhən, dē-\
: a belief that is not true : a false idea
: a false idea or belief that is caused by mental illness
Full Definition of DELUSION
1
: the act of deluding : the state of being deluded
2
a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated
b : a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary; also : the abnormal state marked by such beliefs
okaaaaay.
Let's work with that then. (rolls eyes)
So how do you know something is true? What are your criteria? What is your standard of evidence?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
