Reply With Quote
Just parroting you, Blake.
SARS-CoV-2 Lambda variant exhibits higher infectivity and immune resistance
Highlights
- Lambda S is highly infectious and T76I and L452Q are responsible for this property
- Lambda S is more susceptible to an infection-enhancing antibody
- RSYLTPGD246-253N, L452Q and F490S confer resistance to antiviral immunity
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...07.28.454085v1
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-13-2021 at 10:04 AM.
Just parroting you, Blake.
And of course Biden saw this, but whistled past the graveyards like you all boot stomped President Trump for doing.
Biden gettin' his worry on about eclipsing President Trump's 400k.
tee, hee.
Crazy to get peer pressured into saying no to this drug
Weird. I thought the previous ivermectin study was retracted and replaced with one that said ivermectin is ineffective against COVID. Posted it like a month or so ago.
It gets hard to keep track of them all, but every time Darrin brings up some Ivermectin study there is easily detected fraud.
How it started:
A more recent paper, Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Ivermectin to treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection was accepted for publication July 6, 2021, by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. This study was done by Dr. Andrew Hill and the team that researched ivermectin’s efficacy in COVID-19 treatment for the WHO. The data is overwhelmingly positive and was discussed in detail by Dr. Pierre Kory on the FLCCC’s July 7, 2021, Weekly Update.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/
How it's going:
On July 6, 2021, Open Forum Infectious Diseases published the article “Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Ivermectin to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection” by Hill, et al. Subsequently, we and the authors have learned that one of the studies on which this analysis was based has been withdrawn due to fraudulent data. The authors will be submitting a revised version excluding this study, and the currently posted paper will be retracted.
https://retractionwatch.com/2021/08/...d-say-authors/
weird how personal decisions can affect so many other people.
Lol Now do the Pelosi's!
There's a large study underway that should give a real answer on ivermectin. I think it's the Principal trial by the UK. For some reason the NIH can't do any of these studies despite supposedly being the "gold standard" organization with by far the largest budget.
Unlike HCQ early on, I've never seen the underlying reason to hope that ivermectin would be effective so I don't expect that study to show good results. Seems like if it was the "wonder drug" the FLCCC said it was we would know it by now and they wouldn't be constantly adding to their protocol. Always unproven while ignoring the proven stuff. I can't on them too much though because most of the planet doesn't have access to the proven stuff. If you're in this country and your Dr is following this protocol it's time to find a new Dr. If your stuck living in a hole, it's better than nothing.
Last edited by SnakeBoy; 08-13-2021 at 02:05 PM.
Almost 2 years into the pandemic they're just getting started, estimated completion date March 2023
Sad
The NIH is a worthless en y run by incompetent establishment sycophants who wish to be authoritarians. The whole community who keeps preaching, "follow the science", should be cast into the ocean never to be heard from again just like Atlantis.
Joey doesn't want to follow any science.
Only his tender emotions.
There's no money in it
Iirc it’s shown resistance to the vaccine being used in Chile but not either of the mNRA vaccines and scientists are pretty confident that Pfizer/Moderna work well against the Lambda variant.
So confident that by next week they'll be mandating a booster shot into every American arm. You can see and (hear) it coming, Will.
Probably a few weeks to a month away for the booster of the exact same vaccine people just got.
Then an updated vaccine booster in early 2022. Trials just started.
The claim was the mrna platform allowed for updated vaccines without the need for long new clinical trial, just a 6 week turn around. Don't know what happened to that idea.
If they could do something nose mouth related it would be great.
The vaccines given now are systemic; targeting more immune cells at the entry points is an interesting idea.
Im sure there are debates on this as we dont know.
That's it & that's all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
