Right here:
the Knicks, according to sources, intend to the keep the 21-year-old center.
Where does it say they intend to match? I think they're just outlining the pros and cons. The other article specifically said they were "unlikely to match."
It's a lot of money for a team that has 2 centers being paid a lot already. Matching would basically be admitting they ed up when they took on James and Curry's contracts. We all know they did, but will the Knicks (read: Thomas) admit it?
Right here:
the Knicks, according to sources, intend to the keep the 21-year-old center.
Um, read the first paragraph again.
Why didn't the Spurs put a guaranteed minutes clause in the contract or player can opt out?
I'd bank on the Knicks keeping Butler. They have the money, will spend it, and will use him more than likely in a trade.
@ "staggering"
I'm still wondering if there was a hint of sarcasm in that line...
All this false hope is going to make it suck that much more when the Knicks match.Knicks' Butler signs offer sheet with Spurs
BY GREG LOGAN
Newsday Staff Writer
July 13, 2006, 12:11 PM EDT
Third-string Knicks center Jackie Butler signed an offer sheet worth $7 million over three years with San Antonio when the NBA free-agent signing period opened on Wednesday. Butler is a restricted free agent, so, the Knicks can retain his services by matching the deal within one week.
Team president/coach Isiah Thomas, who is in Las Vegas for the Knicks' final summer league game today, said the team had made no decision yet on Butler and indicated they are likely to wait the full seven days.
The Knicks have the highest payroll in the league, but Butler's deal could well be too rich for them to match. Because they must pay the NBA's dollar-for-dollar luxury tax, the Knicks actually would have to budget $14 million over three years for a third-string center when they already have to pay Eddy Curry $48.64 million over the next five years and Jerome James $24 million over four seasons.
That seems excessive unless they are worried about whether James will report in shape. He was injured in training camp last season, spent 23 games on the inactive list with various ailments and did not play in 14 other games. Butler appeared in 55 games, averaging 5.2 points and 3.2 rebounds.
Butler is represented by agent Keith Glass, who is the son of Joe Glass, the agent for former coach Larry Brown, who was fired with $40 million remaining on his contract. Butler was considered one of Brown's pet projects, but he actually was acquired by Thomas before Brown was hired. So, a decision on Butler likely will come down to basketball and financial considerations, not politics.
Butler is a hard-working low-post scorer who needs work on defense but gives consistent effort. If the Knicks play a fast-paced style, as expected under Thomas, they might go small more often, featuring their abundance of forwards and guards, which would make Butler more expendable.
![]()
23 + 14 + 55 = 92That seems excessive unless they are worried about whether James will report in shape. He was injured in training camp last season, spent 23 games on the inactive list with various ailments and did not play in 14 other games. Butler appeared in 55 games, averaging 5.2 points and 3.2 rebounds.
I guess the season seems damn long in NY.
I think the 14 should be four.
Kori, I think he's talking about two different players.
Ahh, that's true.
Sorry. I read it as the whole thing about Butler.
ESPN.com says James played in 44 games. Still doesn't add up to 82, but close![]()
It's all about Butler with you, isn't it?
ISN'T IT?!
![]()
![]()
![]()
The initial reports all said the Knicks would match. The latest reports are saying that they might not match.
I wonder if there is any substance behind any of this or just NY media talking in circles.
Kind of weird.
It might do well to record who said what--
I'm guessing NYT, Daily News, Newsday (L.I. paper), the Post, etc., all have different and/or overlapping sources. My guess is the Knicks org is dysfunctional enough that communication is pretty bad.
When in doubt, it's always safe to bet on the NY media talking in circles.
It could be that sources close to Isiah are saying that of course they'll match and sources close to Dolan are saying that they don't need to spend the money.
I would laugh my ass off if Dolan took this as an opportunity to cut Zeke off at the knees.![]()
I'd laugh my butt off, too, then say a little prayer of thanks.
Could be that Knicks are looking for a favorable S&T and if they can't get one they let him walk, i.e., they don't know what they'll do.
That too, for sure!
Maybe the Spurs knew what they were doing after all with this offer.The Knicks have the highest payroll in the league, but Butler's deal could well be too rich for them to match. Because they must pay the NBA's dollar-for-dollar luxury tax, the Knicks actually would have to budget $14 million over three years for a third-string center when they already have to pay Eddy Curry $48.64 million over the next five years and Jerome James $24 million over four seasons.
I thought that if the Spurs really wanted Butler, they should have thrown $3M at them, and I don't think the Knicks would have matched that.
If the Knicks want to keep somebody, anything we offer is going to be chump change for them. Our main hope is that they decide that they are up to their eyeballs in guys already and don't need him.
We all know if it's just up to Zeke they'll match -- he'll just stockpile him to trade after December. The question is whether Dolan is on the same page.
Any report on where Butler wants to play in the upcoming season?
His choice of playing with TD as a starter and being a conteder for a le or joining the debacle that is "I hope we can at least sniff the playoffs" knicks. It's so clear that even Stephen A Smith could answer that question.
Knickerbockers or Spurs?
Butler hasn't said anything AFAIK, but is known to want to get out of New York.
It sure looks like there is a great opportunity for Butler here to get a ton of minutes, if not start. At the very best on a healthy Knick roster, he would be the second big man off the bench.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)