Wait. Are you arguing with me or for me?
You're trying to separate time from itself. Time goes back to the beginning of time, which means time always was. No you could not venture to that point because that point doesn't exist and never did. There was never a time where time did not exist.
Wait. Are you arguing with me or for me?
Theret is obviously a load of research on evolution out there on the internets. You're just too lazy to go read it.
And the notion that "intelligent design" should be viewed as science has been struck down in court in humiliating fashion.
There's nothing here for me to debate with you any more than there was between Nye and Ham. Just lots of lols and smhs at your ignorance.
Neither. I'm trying to get you to ask the right questions.
Like Blake?
![]()
Precisely.
![]()
You probably should not be discussing this. It might shake the foundation of your world view that a dude became himself, killed himself and subsequently rejoined himself all for us, whom he created like himself so we could be with him but only because we wanted to.
Blake Almighty?![]()
I am en led to my opinion but to be honest, I have more important things to worry about than what the happened on Earth billions and billons of years ago. I don't give a what happened. I wasn't there so it doesn't affect me. Now if there was some type of chance I could get money out of this , then yeah I'd obviously give a true but there's not so there we are.
You're an idiot.
Yeah, those dressing rooms aren't gonna clean themselves
It's not "billions"
It affects us all you just are not aware that it does.I don't give a what happened. I wasn't there so it doesn't affect me.
You can ask the Discovery channel the History channel national geographic and the many book writers including Darwin.Now if there was some type of chance I could get money out of this , then yeah I'd obviously give a true
Tell that to Darwin's aires.but there's not so there we are.
Nope there was no poof moment in science. It's a continuum. There is disagreement over about when modern humans (mostly based on cranial size) arose. And it's arbitrary. Right now, about 100,000 years ago. No poof. The only poof would occur if we tried to assign an exact time and an exact fossil.
You tell me what a human really is. Obviously it's more than bones and DNA to you and to I. When exactly did a human first ponder it's own existence enough to think of an idea now called God? When? Science can't say. We might look at cave drawings and burials and surmise humans thought of an afterlife. But the first, who was it? I can't answer that based on anything I have read. NO POOF in science. The Big Bang, how did it arise? We don't know. No poof. Science is not afraid to say. But apparently religious types enjoy backing themselves into a corner because they try to judge and make up answers.
There are people on this board that would say we are going to if we don't accept Jesus Christ as our savior. And lots of other bizarre stuff. And then wonder why religion does turn people off...
You will learn the answers after you die.
You are right, there are those on this board who would say that.
But there are even more on this board who bash those who believe in God and yet do not judge the unbelievers among you
The atheists are far more condemning of the theists on this board than the other way around IMHO.
The beginning of time was the birth of the 3rd dimension. God exists in a higher dimension. Man is too ignorant on this side of life to understand all that exists beyond the 3rd dimension. Wonders exist that we cannot even imagine in the higher dimensions.
Speaking from experience?
So the birth of the 3rd came after the birth of higher dimensions. Math isn't your strong suit I see.
There are those who postulate dimensional theories and believe strongly in them.
Women must flock to you in droves, and I don't mean at the layaway counter.
Theories? lol...
Oh that's right, you're part of the emoticon crew that meets at wing joints to talk about forum stuff.
That might well be. I'm not in to making fun of people except when they misrepresent science. And I know this happens very frequently.
But atheists, IMO, don't feel the need to invent a higher power that made humans. At least this is how I view their ideas. It's more reductionist. They don't feel the need to use the supernatural to explain the explainable through other means such as science. I understand this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)