Reply With Quote
I'm intolerant because Trump talked about assassinating Clinton? It's intolerant to expect republican presidents to be held to at least the standard that democrat comics are?
Inherited? that means every guy that has a million then it has a billion and a trillion????????
Trump inherited his father's fortune and got his start off a loan. He also has defaulted on so many loans that no one in western culture will loan him money anymore.
And I don't think anyone here is going to deny that Obama was not bought out by special interest too. OTOH, while Geithner was from the federal reserve, Munchin, Trump's SoT, actually was an executive at Goldman Sachs. Nuance is tough I know.
Just curious how did Sanders encourage violence? I can post a whole lot of videos denouncing it over and again.
whining about Barron like you really give a and claiming that PC people don't know about limits is just rife with cognitive dissonance.
Everyone gives a about being offended themselves. The difference is that that the left by and large actually has empathy about people other than themselves and who they are party to.
If you have a $10.000 you could have $100.000 and then $1.000.000
He called for a revolution, and all his democratic rhetoric is about killing Trump and republicans by talking action, when a socialist talks about ¨revolution¨and ¨action¨ have you ever heard about Che Guevara or Castro? it seems you dont have an idea, but promoting hate has that kind of results, specially from a socialist bozo (who is a millionaire that doesnt share his wealth).
I care about it, 50 something year old farts should not mess with kids no matter who their father is, you are showing your true colors here.
The only thing the left cares about is power, thats why they tried to sell the country for an election bringing illegals lying, accepting money from countries that kills gays and lesbians, creating a whole media campaign against the compe ion, ing one of their own candidates during the primary, deleting 30000 mails, having strong ties with huge corporations to make their own businesses.
All behind that ¨We are the world, we are the children¨ facade because there was no improvement at all, where were the women´s rights during Obama/Mooc e period?
I'm intolerant because Trump talked about assassinating Clinton? It's intolerant to expect republican presidents to be held to at least the standard that democrat comics are?
why are trump s so quick to call everyone snowflakes and lib s when the POTUS is literally the biggest snowflake who gets triggered and butthurt more than anyone in US history while constantly reatreating to his twitter safe space to cry like a ?
You are intolerant because you are putting Trump on a corner when Obama´s medcare did nothing good in 8 years, intolerant because you were judging him since day one, because now its a good time for drinking not 2008-2016, calling for impeachment for nothing and approving Hillary forgetting the fact that Bill is a sexual predator, whats good about Benghazi or the deleted mails? yet you support that, so thats intolerance.
As I said before, if Trump was the madman media tries to sell with all his money Hillary would be dead meat.
Are you on drugs?
why are trump s so quick to call everyone snowflakes and lib s when the POTUS is literally the biggest snowflake who gets triggered and butthurt more than anyone in US history while constantly reatreating to his twitter safe space to cry like a ?
Now deflecting while trying to offend, intolerance at its best.
I'm sorry snowflake
What does putting Trump on a corner mean?
this one's my favorite
which part of that is an inherent characteristic of shifting left?
Snowflakes are liberal dems that support giant corporate s, Im not one of those.
Don't piss me off, I'm gonna put you on a corner.
You said that he did it with his own money. That is not the case. He took out loans and defaulted on them for the majority of his assets.
He called for a political revolution where people got out to vote and reestablished the democratic party. You act like he was a Bolshevik which is stupid.
Barron was invoked after the fact. It's the same argument that PC people make about racial and sexist jokes as how it might effect a of a lot more children who are exposed to them. Griffin did not email the pic to Barron; that is just how your hypocrites spun it.
Your boy just agreed to sell weapons to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. I have no idea what you are talking about. If you want to paint Hillary as a neolib of the new world order I won't argue it but you should look to your own if you take issue with it.
There is a difference between liking Hillary more than Trump and liking Hillary. Nuance is tough I know.
i notice the trump is failing to address any legit points about being duped by president bait and switch
That means he did it by his own, loans or not it was on him was not free and there were risks, unlike using the country assets andpulling political strings like certain others did.You said that he did it with his own money. That is not the case. He took out loans and defaulted on them for the majority of his assets.
He called for a political revolution where people got out to vote and reestablished the democratic party. You act like he was a Bolshevik which is stupid.
Barron was invoked after the fact. It's the same argument that PC people make about racial and sexist jokes as how it might effect a of a lot more children who are exposed to them. Griffin did not email the pic to Barron; that is just how your hypocrites spun it.
Your boy just agreed to sell weapons to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. I have no idea what you are talking about. If you want to paint Hillary as a neolib of the new world order I won't argue it but you should look to your own if you take issue with it.
There is a difference between liking Hillary more than Trump and liking Hillary. Nuance is tough I know.
And Bernie lost the election and still keeps talking about ¨revolution¨and ¨action¨ without telling any concrete thing to do, socialism pushes for violence thats a fact.
It wasnt invoked after the fact, she said she was going after Donald and Barron in December ´16 get your facts straight.
Agreed to make business selling weapons, not pay to play schemes selling the country interests.
I notice you dont have anything useful to say, if Hillary were tweeting as a president you´d be like SHE DOES THAT BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO BE IN TOUCH WITH PEOPLE ASAP.i notice the trump is failing to address any legit points about being duped by president bait and switch
Now if Trump does you´d be like THAT POS IS SCARED SAFE PLACE BLABLA.
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Your problem is that you have to oversimplify things to understand them.
Trump needed help to get started and the notion that he could have built Trump Tower without the loan from his father is deluded. From there he borrowed heavily and used shady accounting to profit off bankruptcy. He's not Thomas Edison by a long shot.
Sanders calls himself a democratic socialist and expressly denounces violence. He call for political action and political revolution. Nuance is tough or you so I understand how it is confusing for oyu.
You are confusing Marxism and Socialism and misrepresenting it. Marx's theory of class struggle predicted proletariat's rising and creating revolution for the communist ideal. Lenin, Mao and others forced the issue but you act like there was some ideological purity within the ranks. That is just ignorant. Stalin for example rose to power by subjugating or outright eliminating democratic socialists to consolidate power in Georgia before instigating his violent uprises.
This notion that socialism inherently means violent revolt to achieve that end is ignorant.
He is arming and entrenching people that are doing the things that you were just complaining about. You can equivocate all you like but you lack logical consistency.
Im not saying he is a genius, but people tend to think he is a poor idiot when not everyone gets richer just because they have a couple millions, some end up living on the streets.Your problem is that you have to oversimplify things to understand them.
Trump needed help to get started and the notion that he could have built Trump Tower without the loan from his father is deluded. From there he borrowed heavily and used shady accounting to profit off bankruptcy. He's not Thomas Edison by a long shot.
Sanders calls himself a democratic socialist and expressly denounces violence. He call for political action and political revolution. Nuance is tough or you so I understand how it is confusing for oyu.
You are confusing Marxism and Socialism and misrepresenting it. Marx's theory of class struggle predicted proletariat's rising and creating revolution for the communist ideal. Lenin, Mao and others forced the issue but you act like there was some ideological purity within the ranks. That is just ignorant. Stalin for example rose to power by subjugating or outright eliminating democratic socialists to consolidate power in Georgia before instigating his violent uprises.
This notion that socialism inherently means violent revolt to achieve that end is ignorant.
He is arming and entrenching people that are doing the things that you were just complaining about. You can equivocate all you like but you lack logical consistency.
The whole ¨daddy was rich and he did nothing right¨ is a lame way to underlook him, even Hillary dared to question his fortune during the debates.
Its not me, its how socialism works, the aggressors during Trump´s rallies and shooters came all from the Dem party.
People breaking and burning things on New York were Dems and neither Hillary nor Bernie said a thing.
Is not a matter of Marx Lenin Guevara Castro, he talks about socialism targeting at what? Venezuela? all that left crap only works on students, thats why he has such young followers but he is not sharing his 3 houses or the million he makes a year, young people are idealists and they dont have problem with violence.
Is not how they get to power or how they control people? Castro?
Whats the hypocrisy?, there are no 2 wrongs make 1 right here, you think picking on a 11 year old kid is fine, no much to say about that.
He is arming people that is not a menace for the US, not selling stuff to North Korea, if not they could buy weapons from other countries anyway.
On the other hand socialist Chavez talked about USA until his last breath calling Bush jr MR DANGER, and then he picked on Obama he was ¨THESE IMPERIALIST PIGS BLAH BLAH THEY ARE WATCHING US THEY WANT TO TAKE OUR COUNTRIES¨ and while he made those stupid speeches Venezuela was selling petroleum to the States, they keep selling it and by the time of his death, his daughter had 4 billion in USA banks.
What you said is that he did it on his own. You keep dissembling and equivocating but he did not do it on his own. You can beat up all the strawmen you like.
You read just like Chucho just not as shrill with this insistence of leftist violence. There are crazies on both extremes. The leadership of only one side called for violence. That would be Trump on his lonesome. Trump saying that any protesters at his rallies should be beaten contributed to the violence at his rallies moreso than anything that Sanders did or said.
And how would you know how socialism works? You can pretend socialism = sandinistas if it makes you feel better but that is a pretty dumbed down way of looking at it. Most of europe is socialist to one degree or another and LBJ and Nixon did not require violent revolution to enact their socialist policies.
I'm not saying that their are not violent marxists. That is asinine. Equally as ignorant is the calim that all must be like that. Bottom line is that Sanders has only denounced violence.
They hypocrisy is calling out people for saying something offensive because of Barron and then turning around and ignoring all the times your party says offensive things by palying the PC card. I have no idea why you come at me with this two things wrong make a right. Your the one with the moral equivalent after another.
And who gives a about Chavez unless you want to talk about Kissinger and his role in ting the bed on the gulf coast of south america. If you want to bring up violent scialists then LEnin and Stalin are a much better example. OTOH, Sweden, Holland, Denmark, Portugal, Iceland, and Finland are all examples of socialist states taht were peacefully formed. The Scandinavian model is precisely what Sanders calls for.
Frankly using your logic people could have said that the democracy was inherently violent because of the way that the US, France, British, and similar fledgling democracies were formed. And indeed royalists made that exact argument. It's interesting how modern day conservatives are so similar to tories and other royalists from the 19th century.
To all you democrats out there, just curious, what do you think of the Evergreen college day of absence for white people and the student demands to fire a white professor who refused to stay home from work?
I'm not a democrat, have not voted the dem ticket this millennium, but I side with the extremely liberal democratic professor in question.
I can understand why you would want to focus on the fringe and kids as opposed to the leadership given the Cheese Puff that leads you.
Just curious. My guess is that the perception of the college students has led to a President Trump.
It wasn't college students that carried him in the primaries. That would be poor uneducated whites. By definition college students don't fall into that category.
Millennials are angry and they have the plurality too now. They would have carried Sanders just like they did Obama. They turned their back on Hillary not that I blame them.
Trump catered to white trash with his rhetoric otoh and they carried him. I'm hoping they are not so stupid that they don't see that he lied and shape up but we will see.
Bipartisan distaste for the establishment led to Trump is what I think.
He did it on his own just like he is the POTUS now, had no REP help, media was against him etc., you are making strawmen arguments by putting his dad loans and whatever you like.
He said that after Dem s started, what kind of re goes looking for troubles when there are probably a thousand people supporting a candidate? so no, there are no crazies on both extremes, they were just Dem s trying to hurt people that went to support their candidate, they had no business at all going there, do you go to LGBT parades to hurt people?
Of couse Bernie is not a true socialist, he has 3 houses one of them is worth like $800.000 but you have no guarantee of what can he do, specially when he let Hillary him hard and was more than ok with it.
I dont understand whats the good part of picking 11 years old kids, there is no PC at all, only a re would do something like that, so lets say Im a fairly tall dude and I hate some guy, should I go after his son while he is walking down the street, punch him in the stomach or something like that because who cares?
Thats your policy not mine, you are mixing things up, saying Reps says offensive things by playing the PC card, but I´ve never seen them picking on Obama´s daughters and they were 10 and 8 when Barry had his first term, they are not even talking about them now that there are some pics of one of them smoking weed, oh Barry the good fatha.
That doesnt work in the USA... Sweden, Holland, Denmark, Portugal, Iceland, and Finland people is very different than Americans.
Sometimes Democracy is violent, is what it is, why deny it? And in other eras as you say violence was more than common to control people.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions