Reply With Quote
Your claim, your burden of proof. We already established that Robert Morris was a proponent of federal taxation, and the US Cons ution that formed the Union and signed by all States at the time did not impose any such limitation.
He'll leave her where he left Clinton...where he found her. She'll use Hussein Obama's cross fingered promise:::"I will be President to all Americans, black or white alike."
Lasted about a year, maybe 2 before he race baited the countryside his remaining Presidency.
Even making that broken promise she'll grudge it, in full knowledge she'll break it. Hussein had every intention of keeping his...his brothers set him straight Day 1. She has no such intention.
& my fellow dumb s we'll fall for it. "Oh, God, I'm doing so financially well, I need to be tied to the flag pole out in the front yard and beaten severely. Then I'll tie my husband to the pole and he can get his just desserts. Oh. Ohl, I feel so bad. Beat me hard, just leave me my $, fully intact."
Your claim, your burden of proof. We already established that Robert Morris was a proponent of federal taxation, and the US Cons ution that formed the Union and signed by all States at the time did not impose any such limitation.
You've already proved it. But I wouldn't take it upon myself to teach you basic US history otherwise.
As was Alexander Hamilton. And they gained no traction. Hard dots to connect here, eh?
Biden has no chance of hanging on. Harris will win the nomination and likely the presidency.
Meanwhile despite the media narrative about how great Buttigieg did, his polling didn't noticeably improve at all. His 15 minutes is just about up. Booker didn't get much of a bump in the polls either.
Warren has a better shot than Harris imo.
Seriously premature prediction based off your perception she "won" something by going after old Joe. That was a premeditated attack that will hurt her more than help her in the long run.
I’m not sure if it will hurt her, but it’s definitely premature ejaculation to act like she’s become a favorite for the nomination.
She didn’t look atrong as much as senile Joe looked unprepared for not seeing that attack coming, she was clearly planning that weeks in advance.
Yeah, her office even had the "girl in pigtails" photo ready to roll out immediately after the debate. It was in extremely bad taste and a lot of traditional Democrat money raisers found it offensive. Like I said, it will end up hurting her more than helping.
I still dont understand her point. Joe was absolutely right that if you want to get legislation passed in Congress you sometimes have to work with people you find distasteful.
I'd say she's my favorite to win. Yeah, any definitive statement is premature.
The black lady painting the white guy as a racist based isn't going to hurt her in the Dem primary.
It is when the guy was clearly not a racist. It was a cheap shot appreciated only by shallow intellects.
And compulsory bussing was a ing disaster.
If she ever gets to the point (I don't think she will) where there's enough momentum behind her as a candidate, those same traditional Democrat money raisers will throw their support behind her to help get her over the hump in exchange for her giving in to their agenda(the same way they did with Obama after he won the first few primary states in 2008)
I think she clearly knew what Biden was saying but saw an opportunity to take a shot, which ended up working since Biden did an awful job of getting that point across about having to work with adversaries, and instead he looked like he was trying to champion state's rights.
They sure did gain traction, seeing there's no language on the Cons ution putting any barriers to such taxation. Not only that, but tariffs, another form of general taxation, already existed by the 1790s.
In other words, I don't expect you to admit you were wrong, I'll let the readers reach their own conclusions considering the evidence presented...
Any prediction at this point is premature. Votes have not even been cast yet, and that always changes perceptions.
Trump was polling at ~1% at this point.
In stories about this, it's often omitted that those distasteful people were Democrats.
Darrin waves the bloody shirt of Civil Rights he's not really all that crazy about anyway....
muh party of Lincoln
I commend you on your argumentation and what not; but I'll still have to admit you're wrong. The fact of the matter is that the USA was founded as a largely federal tax averse nation.
how is that even remotely relevant to the discussion at hand lol. just gotta stick ur d'souza in out of habit?
Like I said, dogma
dem pompoms not gonna wave demselves...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions