I don't believe it.
Scan in your report card.
I know you have it.
This topic is about me?
I don't believe it.
Scan in your report card.
I know you have it.
I've skipped over the last few pages. Is it this college:
?On February 13, 2013, College of the Sequoias was notified that the Accrediting Commission for Community Colleges (ACCJC) had placed COS on “Show Cause.”*The Board, Administration, Faculty, and Staff take the order to “Show Cause” very seriously.*We know that our students and our communities are counting on us to return the College to full accreditation status.*President Carrizosa has appointed a Response Task Force which will
respond to each of the recommendations. Between October 2013 and January 2014, an evaluation team and officers from the ACCJC will be at our ins ution for visits.*In January 2014, the report and the findings of the visits will be evaluated by the Commission.*It is our plan and expectation that the problems will be resolved and that our ins ution will be taken off “Show Cause." *
http://www.cos.edu/Accreditation/Pages/default.aspx
All 300 of them are.
Stanford was his safety school.On February 13, 2013, College of the Sequoias was notified that the Accrediting Commission for Community Colleges (ACCJC) had placed COS on “Show Cause.”*The Board, Administration, Faculty, and Staff take the order to “Show Cause” very seriously.*We know that our students and our communities are counting on us to return the College to full accreditation status.*President Carrizosa has appointed a Response Task Force which will
respond to each of the recommendations. Between October 2013 and January 2014, an evaluation team and officers from the ACCJC will be at our ins ution for visits.*In January 2014, the report and the findings of the visits will be evaluated by the Commission.*It is our plan and expectation that the problems will be resolved and that our ins ution will be taken off “Show Cause." *
http://www.cos.edu/Accreditation/Pages/default.aspx
I was asked to come here.
Why not drop all your stupid bull an actually try to talk like a real human being?
The problem is you simply can't stand anyone who does know a lot of bragging about it....right?
It has been since the OP when you declared your own common sense and anecdotal experience to be more reliable than the numerous studies showing children suffer little-to-no damaging effects from being raised by same-sex adoptive parents.
So you missed all those copy/paste sites agreeing with me....right?
You really do need to bone up on this.
What idiot would do that? And why do you always slavishly do what everyone asks" Oh yeah, you crave approval.
Why not stop posting almanac lists and stupid videos no one wants to see.Why not drop all your stupid bull an actually try to talk like a real human being?
But you really don't know that much.The problem is you simply can't stand anyone who does know a lot of bragging about it....right?
So you missed all the sites that on you?
I was recruited to play football for COS having gone to a local HS. But before I could attend my girl friend came up pregnant, o...US Navy. After those 4 years I now had mouths to feed so I got into selling health insurance (her brother was in the business). After 4 year of that I quit, that's when I got a job working days, went back to school on the GI bill.
Considering the topic is about gay people, yes, it's about you...
Yeah, it's totally not about you....
You mean the sites you linked that also rely upon anecdotal evidence and gut feelings? No. I read them. Have also read several scientific studies over the years that completely dismantle your assertion.
But none of that has anything to do with my point that this thread is and always has been about you. As are all of the threads that you start. As will be all of the threads you'll start in the future. You are the only subject you've ever discussed here, and even there your expertise is dubious.
Bingo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That's it right there, that's what this place is all about. You know I'm married have a family you know I'm not gay but reality doesn't natter...here... just have some silly fun, so I do.
In that case, I think I speak for everyone when I say we ask you to leave....
Since when does spamming lists and YouTubes cons ute "talking like a real human being"?Why not drop all your stupid bull an actually try to talk like a real human being?
You don't know anything interesting, and people tend to get turned off by bragging....The problem is you simply can't stand anyone who does know a lot of bragging about it....right?
We know that you've said those things.
No. It doesn't natter at all. Because despite how much you want us to, no one here cares about the particulars of your daily life.
There have also been scieniftic studies proving you wrong. Then there really is....common sense.
I don't start talking about myself, you guys do. No matter what my the topc is you giys would rather talk about me. You really haven't noticed that?
The OP.It was all about you, dumbass.
It's clear the College of the Sequoias was not the most selective school around.
I'm having too much fun to leave. What do you do here besides whine? You sure wouldn't be missed.
Why lie? Most my threads are me giving an opinion, why lie about that?
Dude, sports, music,religion, literature, movies...aren't interesting? Ok then...what is?
No .
You make them all boring, Fatty McAlmanac.Dude, sports, music,religion, literature, movies...aren't interesting? Ok then...what is?
You have a funny way of showing it since you spend 90% of your posts whining about "leeches" and "leg-humpers"...
Your threads involve either incredibly mundane trivia or closed-minded, bigoted opinions on political issues.... then, whenever anyone tries to have a debate with you, you melt down and start up with the logical fallacies, calling us "leeches," etc....Why lie? Most my threads are me giving an opinion, why lie about that?
Nothing you post is interesting to anyone, fatty....Dude, sports, music,religion, literature, movies...aren't interesting? Ok then...what is?
I'm not skimming through 15 pages just so my comment isn't exactly the same as someone else's. But, there are a lot of kids in foster homes with no where to go. There are a lot of kids who are living below the poverty line. There are a lot of kids who are in single parent households. There is an argument that has merit which says, men and women need positive role models from their particular gender. , there's an argument which has merit that says, kids need positive role models from each gender. Both I agree with.
But that doesn't mean it's an absolute necessity for those role models to derive from the immediate family unit. Although, there is an argument (not to say it's a correct argument, as I haven't explored it extensively) to be made that, it would be more beneficial for both positive role models to be present in the traditional sense (all other aspects equal) because it's more tangible on a day to day basis. But that doesn't take away from the legitimacy of a same sex household. If same sex couples have the means to provide for kids that need homes, or their own children, then there's really nothing to talk about. And I also take issue with hetero households that can't properly provide for their children.
And what do you do?
My song n' dance has always been if all things are equal a child does need that traditional family setting if at all possible, if not then sure a gay couple will work.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)