Reply With Quote
yep, the intermediate area was USA and Pootin nuking EU instead of each other.
Any Russian whining is strictly proforma.
The EU with less USA umbrella is Trash executing Pootin's geopolitical strategy.
So Russia is violating the treaty. The goal should be to bring them back into compliance and not give them more room to violate what was in the treaty. But that goes above your head so stick to being a male secretary.
yep, the intermediate area was USA and Pootin nuking EU instead of each other.
Any Russian whining is strictly proforma.
The EU with less USA umbrella is Trash executing Pootin's geopolitical strategy.
so keep checks on them and let them destroy themselves with their own actions or let rid ourselves of nato and go back to the cold war days... interesting. this is the first i have heard/read of this treaty. i'll have to read up some more on it.
we all know the size of your brain is equivalent to a pea so don't try... as well, your insults are damn near 15 yrs old so you might want to get some new material shortround.
Like I said it went over your musty head.
If you're not an asshole about it he might consider what you have to say... see two posts up.
did it? did you see the reply i gave above to winehole? it went over your head tbh!
now get back to soldering my needles and packaging them tubes i use for work shortround!
that's all i ever ask for but never receive here. thanks for allowing an open channel of communication void of insults and trolling.
that's all i ever ask for but never receive here. thanks for allowing an open channel of communication void of insults and trolling.
interpersonal skills and tact can make a difference in conversation, even on a silly current events subforum like this one.that's all i ever ask for but never receive here. thanks for allowing an open channel of communication void of insults and trolling.
El Nono is pretty much the paragon of that here.
what's your point?
i can say anything i want yet nothing i said in that second quote was directed towards any of you so what's your point?
winehole and i are opposites yet he/she didn't come at me with insults and instead provided me with context. that's appreciated and makes me more inclined to read more from winehole.
you add nothing spurraider but your childish trolling.
you do almost nothing here but hurl insult and death wishes and then have the gall to post that "all you ask for here" is for others not to be assholes to you
i have never ever hurled anything without first being provoked. i can play the game too so why hate the player? you know the rest... keepif that's your thing though.
Roger Stone ‘has no defense’: Ex-prosecutor predicts Trump pal will ‘crack’ after courthouse appearance
ex-federal prosecutor Paul Butler appeared on MSNBC with Ari Melber to explain the connections between Stone and Trump, and why he expects Roger Stone to flip.
“I don’t believe the president, in part because he wasn’t coherent [in a New York Timesinterview] even yesterday.
At first, he said that Rod Rosenstein had directly told him that he was not a target and
then he said well, maybe he told my lawyers and
the reporter asked, ‘Well, when?’ He couldn’t remember,”
“So there’s a specific definition in the Department of Justice handbook which I looked at every day when I was a prosecutor.
A target is someone who is about to be indicted.
The specific phrase is
‘when the prosecutor has substantial evidence linking him to the commission of a crime.’
Almost certainly,
in the southern district,
Donald Trump, or Individual-A, as the prosecutor there likes to call him,
is a target of that investigation.”
Butler said he thinks
Stone will flip given that he doesn’t have much of a defense.
the “ roach” of American politics is not likely to go quietly.
“But if he’s looking at 10 years if he’s convicted, at least, which means he will be 77,” Butler said.
“We’ll see how much of a firebrand he is then.
That’s why I think he’s probably going to make a deal.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/rog...e+Raw+Story%29
Ex-US Attorney Bharara questions why Trump hasn’t fired his ‘TV lawyer’ Giuliani:
‘It boggles people’s minds’
Preet Bharara said that it was mind-boggling that President Donald Trump has fired other staffers except for his lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Trump admitted that Giuliani was wrong about comments made about a potential Trump Tower in Moscow, Russia.
“Rudy has been wrong a little bit. But what has happened is this: I didn’t care,” Trump told The Times. “
That deal was not important.
It was essentially a letter of intent or an option.”
“By the client’s own reckoning,
that lawyer is making misstatements and that
lawyer has had to withdraw statements and
sometimes makes statements that are not in the interest of the client,”
“I don’t understand why that representation continues.
I don’t understand why the president fires other people who are competent but retains this lawyer.
Rudy Giuliani is basically the TV lawyer. The real lawyers are operating behind the scenes,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/it-...e+Raw+Story%29
To kill your parents then plead for leniency on account of your youth is the definition of chutzpah, but reveals a real human need: to be treated with respect.
Gotta give it to get it.
i don't think a lot of these people understand that i've been here since like 2005 or earlier and from the get go i was only here because i figured like minded spurs fans were here too until the trolls outweighed the fans and this is what the board has become. i have dealt with ty people on here for a long time now. i won't claim i am an angel but i've learned over the years that most want to troll and so i sling it back. what i'd rather do is have a conversation of differing opinions but still be civil about it; maybe that'll come in time or ST will cease to exist one day without that resolution.
all you have to do is look at that "FOR SALE!!!" thread i created not even a week ago to see what i've had to deal with here for the last 10 yrs or more. it's pathetic.
Sorry you feel hard done by, but in fairness, you go pretty rough on posters here.
People can't read minds and intentions. We're all judged by words and deeds.
indeed.
NATO allies 'fully support' U.S. action on INF treaty
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1PQ4WX
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_162996.htm
djohn
Which allies? Don’t see any countries named.NATO allies 'fully support' U.S. action on INF treaty
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1PQ4WX
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_162996.htm
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
