Nope. Time is immutable.
Sorry, TSA.
What legal proof exists that Trump told Cohen to do anything?
Nope. Time is immutable.
Sorry, TSA.
I just explained it.
The CONVICTION of Cohen in the SDNY - has to be approved by a judge's ruling on the case - so the prosecutors had to present the overwhelming evidence that they had to prove that the facts were confirmed.
They did.
The Judge had to rule that
yes - the crime - as described - was committed and that
Cohen - as alleged - was guilty and that
Trump - as alleged and as described - and that the evidence proved - is the person that directed those crimes and those crimes show a conviction. That charge is filed legally and Cohen is going to prison.
Trump is guilty of directing those payments and directing this conspiracy and must be prosecuted for said crime - either now - or as soon as he leaves office.
This is not my claim, my theory or my "wishcasting" -=
this is proof that the presiding Judge already ruled on and Cohen is heading to prison for.
I’ll even give you this one to make things interesting. Anything else Steele got correct that wasn’t publicly available at the time of his report?
I'm not looking at it.
I simply knew that one off the top of my head. It destroys your narrative o' the day.
Sorry, TSA.
OK so you proved that not everything in the dossier was public knowledge without even looking at it. Now prove it again because I look bad right now!
![]()
You’re the only one who made a claim here and needed to back it.
I think you misunderstand how this works.
I made it.
The existence of time backs it.
Sorry about your narrative o' the day, TSA.
Why do you continue to defend a dossier and it’s collusion narrative when you’ve stated that you don’t believe any collusion took place?
It's raw intel. Your attempts to require trial level evidence for everything regarding Trump but not your own conspiracy theories is the best running joke of the past three years.
Non answer try again.
Why do you continue to defend a dossier and it’s collusion narrative when you’ve stated that you don’t believe any collusion took place?
I defend it as raw intel.
What is your conspiracy theory about it again?
you defend it because you're spineless and pavthetic. we already know this though so why keep pretending otherwise?
lol sissy won't talk about the actual subject.
what the fake fraud that is the dossier? lmao! that pos do ent bought and paid for by HRC? lmao!
pavthetic you're just upset because we all see through your bs and faux intellectualism.
Yeah, you can't even talk about that.![]()
You're just upset because you're a sissy.
not going to do this bs with you all day pavthetic. you are simply a spineless pos weak male. your kind are super easy to point out tbh.![]()
Of course you aren't going to do anything but whine about the people who are smarter than you and expose you as a weak, dumb sissy.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)