Reply With Quote
I went with Brian Jonestown Massacre:
http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fusea...ideoid=9023920
"Ladies and gentlemen, uh, we've just lost the picture, but what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has apparently been taken over- 'conquered' if you will- by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive Earthman or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."
OMGI forgot about that episode.
BTW Lou Dobbs just said on his show, "let's not rule out Obama is devil" in response to a statement by a guest that Obama is not the devil the right is making him out to be.
I went with Brian Jonestown Massacre:
http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fusea...ideoid=9023920
You forgot the "he had an affair with a white woman" card, which they are probably saving for robo-calls during the last week of the campaign.
Michael Jordan used to play for the Chicago Bulls, whose colors are red and black. Obama lives in Hyde Park, a suburb of Chicago, and is a huge basketball fan. Between the two of them, ONE of them is the Anti Christ.OMG
BTW Lou Dobbs just said on his show, "let's not rule out Obama is devil" in response to a statement by a guest that Obama is not the devil the right is making him out to be.
Yeah it was. I read it when it first started, not many replies or viewers. decided to do some work, looked again and damn, 2000+ viewing, 250+ replies and 10,000+ viewsYeah, this was a great thread.. I thought Spurstalk was on the blink or Kori transferred the Spurs game day thread to this thread.
Great read!
No what the world needs is less condescending little pricks. So what if she believes what she does. She and the millions of others. All beliefs systems out there deserve respect. Islam, Muslim, Buddhist, Athiests, hindu's, the Jews(I don't know what they call it, cause i was thinking Jewism but no.)etc. Not necessesarily because of what they teach, but because people believe that and its apart of their lives. As long as they are not hurting anybody who the are you to judge what they are.
So you, you're dog, you're car, and anyone like you who puts themselves above reproach. Like it or not you to follow a dogma that may or may not be wrong but you won't know till you're worm fodder.
I'll never forget the first Slayer concert I went to in 98. I was 19 and I was talking to a 30ish guy in the pit before the show. Nice guy. I was new in the AF at the time and we were bull ting about Austin b/c I was at Ft Hood. Slayer hit the stage and this guy punched me in the face and started kicking ass in the pit. Memories......
...Judaism
how on Earth Lou Dobbs is still on CNN is beyond me. He belongs on Fox. At least with the election he has something else to about besides immigrants.OMG
BTW Lou Dobbs just said on his show, "let's not rule out Obama is devil" in response to a statement by a guest that Obama is not the devil the right is making him out to be.
No, they don't. Angel Luv has always exhibited impeccable online manners and deserves to be treated with polite courtesy, but that doesn't mean we have to treat the "Obama may be the Anti Christ" meme with respect.
the Jews(I don't know what they call it, cause i was thinking Jewism but no.)
As long as they aren't proclaiming "Death to Obama" what's wrong with that. Like most teachings of this nature time will do its job disproving these things, It sounds stupid but there's worse more radical teachings out there. I will add that I meant they deserve respect as long as they don't harm anyone.
Yeah, but whatever "dogma" he's following is not telling him that a person is the anti-Christ, the person who is going to try and destroy Christianity. That's a pretty dangerous belief to have, don't you think? Someone in this forum actually believes that Obama could be the one predicted in the Bible who opposes Jesus and seeks to replace him. How could you expect anyone in this forum not to react to that?
Nice work. Here's a video for Angel_Luv
They took the video down. They must be on to you!!!
Damn, is that Roadhouse?
Talk about missing the entire point. You need to catch up on your reading, especially this part:
I don't condone that she believes in god, I'm actually very respectful of those people, and stated so many times. What I have a problem with is the intellectually dishonest, irrational people that try to impose their religious views on me. I don't care if she believes in the flying spaghetti monster, just respect the fact that I don't, and don't come preaching to me over and over how the world is your way or the highway. That's exactly what intolerance is.
So before you try to pass judgment on me again, make sure you get informed.
Because it's a stupid ing belief to hold and she deserves getting called out for it.
She literally believes that Obama could be the anti-Christ and may try to destroy Christianity. What evidence there is for this for her to think it might be him over any other person on this planet, I have no idea. I can only assume it's because at sometime, someone in her narrow-minded circle of religious peers said something about this and now in her mind, it's a perfectly reasonable possibility.
My question is, at what point do you tell yourself that "You know what, he might be the anti-Christ. I had never considered it before, but now that I think about it - it makes sense." How do you get to that point? I'd really like to know.
There are volumes of conflicting information, each with its own agenda and misleading half-truths. With any controversy like this, the answer usually lies somewhere in the middle. Jesus (or somebody resembling his character) likely existed and was a local folk hero who lived on in tales passed from people who knew him. Keep in mind the first books of the New Testament weren't written until years after his death. Much like any story passed on by word-of-mouth, details begin to change (quite dramatically in some cases) and the story takes on a life of its own. While Jesus may have been a real person, the deification assigned to him was certainly the product of exaggeration. Sadly, these supernatural claims about Christ drown out the positive aspects of Christian philosophy, causing the myths to become the focal point instead of the message.The story of Jesus as presented in the four gospels of the New Testament is essentially a piece of fiction. There are no authentic references to such a figure in the works of any historians of the early 1st century CE (common era). The pre-gospel writings of the early Christians also make no reference to the life and teachings of a recent historical Jesus. Paul, for instance, was supposedly Jesus' contemporary, yet he never claimed to have met him in the flesh or to have met anyone else who had done so; he encountered him only in visions, as a spiritual being. The Christian groups of the 1st century CE held extremely diverse theological views, and this would be hard to explain if they were the followers of a single, recent teacher. Remarkably, they showed no interest in the holy sites and relics associated with Jesus' alleged earthly career; it was not until the 4th century that pieces of the 'true cross' began to surface, and that the first shrine was set up on the supposed mount of Jesus' death.
It is only in the four canonical gospels and certain other New Testament writings that the now orthodox story of Jesus is to be found. The gospels, however, were largely written in the 2nd century, have suffered numerous alterations and additions, and contain significant contradictions and inconsistencies. Their shortcomings are recognized by Christian and non-Christian scholars alike. Some theologians are now prepared to question not only the virgin birth and miracles, but even the much more fundamental doctrine of the resurrection. Theology professor Burton Mack, for example, goes as far as to call the gospels' portrayal of Jesus 'fantastic', 'the result of a layered history of imaginative embellishments of a founder figure' [1]. But even the very existence of a great Christian founder figure living at the start of the 1st century is highly implausible, given the silence of contemporary historians and even 1st-century Christians [2].
H.P. Blavatsky stated that the story of Jesus was invented after the 1st century. Jesus, she says,
is a deified personification of the glorified type of the great Hierophants of the Temples, and his story, as told in the New Testament, is an allegory, assuredly containing profound esoteric truths, but still an allegory. . . . Every act of the Jesus of the New Testament, every word attributed to him, every event related of him during the three years of the mission he is said to have accomplished, rests on the programme of the Cycle of Initiation, a cycle founded on the Precession of the Equinoxes and the Signs of the Zodiac. [3]
The gospel figure of Jesus is a Jewish adaptation of the mythical godman found under many different names in ancient pagan mystery religions: in Egypt he was Osiris, in Greece Dionysus, in Asia Minor Attis, in Syria Adonis, in Italy Bacchus, in Persia Mithras. All the major elements of the Jesus story, from the virgin birth to the crucifixion and resurrection, can be found in earlier stories of pagan godmen. As G. de Purucker puts it:
the 'Gospel' story is merely an idealized fiction, written by Christian mystics in imitation of esoteric mysteries of the 'Pagans,' showing the initiation trials and tests of the candidate for initiation; and it is not very well done, there being much error and many mistakes in the 'Gospels.' [4]
Her pastor told her that he might be the Anti-Christ, so it must be so.
She's like all those other nut job christians who believe everything their pastor tells them to believe, even when it goes against the very bible itself.
It's pathetic, and she deserves to be called out for it.
And, when she's presented with proof, she refuses to acknowledge what she said was pure idiocy.
Hypocrite.
The wolds needs less of people like her.
come on. That's just hateful. Leave the over-the-top hate speech for the McCain rally wackos.
Over the top??
She's calling Barack Obama The Anti-Christ!!
I'm gonna assume you mean "condemn" there.
Believe it or not there are people out there, that are so blind. Why condemn them and not those that led them in that direction. My biggest qualm was you saying "f you're Jesus, cause her Jesus is my Jesus.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
