Poor Mikey is hoping someone will bring something to the table for him.
Yeah the Clinton impeachment was real too, yet nothing happened.I already did. The money laundering is a matter of federal record and I am content to let all the current investigations run their respective courses.
Whats your point?
The point is, Poor Mikey, you still haven't brought anything to the table.
Neither you nor any poster here.The point is, Poor Mikey, you still haven't brought anything to the table.
You were the one that made the original gripe about dems dumbass.Neither you.
What are you bringing to the table Blake?
Neither you nor any poster here.
r Mikey shuts the up quick when asked about the thing he claims concerns him most. It's like he simply doesn't know what he's talking about or something.
Says the WaPo reader...
Poor Mikey spending the entire day deflecting from the corruption he brought up.
I'm sitting at a different gripe table than yours, dumbass.
As well he should. There is nothing worse that a confident moron.
(Sigh)
No, that isn't fact checking. That is doing the same thing that the moon landing deniers do when you show them scientist's statements. "that's crap"
Fact checking is when you go out and independently attempt to verify things.
One example would be, say finding out if Roth really was given a post in the administration, after being a Trump business partner, and given a post he was really unqualified for.
Did you do something like that?
Exactly and you never fact checked any of those WaPo articles.
Never questioned Soros, Bezos or any info from his friends sites.
The one with intestinal pains?
Says the WaPo reader whose only complain is a casino thing that happened 20 years ago, no complains on Clinton´s impeachment or why never Hillary left him and approved his way of life but the pro was retain power and influence on his lame dem party.
Chumpy loves to question every single little thing of anyone, but here nothing happens, system failure?
Poor Chumpy
Sure I have.
The original Atlantic article has hundreds of original links, as I noted, to all sorts of news sources.
The inherent conflicts of interest are very, very easy to fact check. The corruption is so easy to find, you would have to be actively ignoring it not to be able to fact check anything within minutes.
Well then explain the Russian Collusion.
So you didn't do any fact-checking.
You chose lazy again.
You don't really care about corruption, and were lying when you said you did.
Only one of the 30+ instances of Trumps corruption and conflicts of interest dealt with Russia.
Don't you want explanations of the others? It's global.
Nope, Im like Chump I need feasible info, I wont question anyone if it fits my agenda, they are good people to me since there are no broken laws.
How does it sound?
You are not explaining the Russian Collusion, only deflection to other things.
Poor Mike.
If he were old enough to know what a broken record sounded like...
Reading this is like watching a special form of Terets.
"WaPo"!!! (slaps forhead) "SOROS!!!"
Deflecting from Trumps corruption by demanding I explain "the Russian Collusion" and claiming I'm deflecting when I switch back to the original subject.
Sorry Mike. I'm stopping here.
I have, rightly, been occasionally criticized for engaging in people who are obviously not up to the task, and making fun of them too much. It is not a good thing, and unkind.
If you want to actually read any of the stuff I have posted, or any real questions, feel free to post that. Otherwise, I wish you well.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote