Ely, Horry, and Bonner are the ones not under fully guaranteed contracts next year...that's a place to start
as I understand it, they have to give it, or they lose his rights.
so (in theory) it could happen, that Ian informs the Spurs (till 1st of July) that he isn't under contract and isn't going to sign with another (non NBA) team for the upcomming season and wants to play in the NBA, then Spurs have till 10th of september to make a Required Tender. if they don't he becomes a FA.
so, Ian isn't able to decide to just come for the paycheck, no matter if Spurs want him or not.
Ely, Horry, and Bonner are the ones not under fully guaranteed contracts next year...that's a place to start
And second round picks aren't protected the same way as first rounders, if I recall. IIRC, Scola's rights are retained by the Spurs in perpetuity or unless he stays out of professional basketball for a year, in which case his rights revert back to him.
You think he'll be traded in the off-season, or you think he'll just never make it across the pond?
That's correct.
From what I hear, he thinks he'll be in the NBA next year.
I am guessing the Spurs will trade his rights but I'm just guessing.
I'm with Kori here: Scola will be traded and to a team that wants him over right away. He'll be seen in an NBA uniform next season, but not as a Spur.
Question is what they get for him.
Well since Kori made her point, I'll make mine....
There WILL be a roster crunch this off-season, where I see a maximum of two (2) 2007 draftees being on the roster next year...and I think it'll be more like one.
It happens almost never because it's a bad situation : playing for a team that doesn't want you.
If Mahinmi say that he really wants to play in nba, Spurs can't just say : "No, stay in europe one more year". They will have to negotiate to find a solution ann if they can't find one, Mahinmi will have the last word.
Oh I don't think they'll be any draftees on the Spurs team next year, unless they trade up and get someone above 15 or so.
Otherwise, I think they'll dump their picks.
Or the Spurs lose his rights.
But my point was that it never really goes down like that. If Mahinmi tries to be a hardass with the stats he's put up (which I don't think are all his fault) he'll look horrible.
So that's why I'm saying if the Spurs want him here, he'll be here.
If that happens in a draft as deep as this and with the Spurs need to get younger....so help me God, I'll....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Good use of emoticons.
IMO the whole thing would only work, if the other team has some security that Scola signs the kind of contract, he was asking last years from the Spurs. (reported were 3 years /10 million).
there will be some teams, that would bite, because it is a very reasonable contract for a player like him.
I could see that the Nets, Bulls, Sixers, Raptors (depending on what they know about Garbajosa's injury and his chance to come back), Bobcats, Rockets, Lakers might have some interest, considering their needs and their system.
if at least two teams have a significant interest it would help to raise the price.
Yeah, I'm not sure the Spurs pass on this draft, not with a good draft and especially not with an aging roster. I'm not sure what they could toss their picks away for and I'm not sure how they come away after having three to four picks with not even a single rookie on the roster.
From a trade-up perspective...(as of 2 Apr)
Charlotte from Toronto at 22
Lakers at 19
Philly from Denver at 18
New Jersey at 16
I'd think Scola's agent would be put in contact with any team wanting to trade for Scola's rights.
I don't see why he will look horrible.
If Mahinmi want to try to play in nba, he should be able to do it even if Spurs' FO thinks that he isn't ready.
When you draft a 18 years old player, you had to accept to have some non productive years from him.
yes, I thought that the Sixers (Nuggets) pick at 18 and the Bobcats (Raptors) pick at 22 look like the best option for the Spurs in a trade up scenario.
again- if a team has the security (don't know how somewhat like this can be pre arranged under the rules) that Scola signs with them for a sure prce it could work.
if teams give away the pick in a good draft year, just to learn that (for example) Scola now wants the full MLE for 5 years, or that he just doesn't want to play in Charlotte, their FO would look very very poor, especially if the Spurs find a good player with their pick.
Strong-arming an employer does not look good to other prospective employers. Goes double or triple for a closed, collaborative ownership system like the NBA, but it would also affect him somewhat if he played again in Europe. It'd be a 'bad faith' move of the type it took Boozer a long time to live down and only through a good amount of success.
I don't see at all the link with Boozer.![]()
It will give more a bad reputation to Spurs FO. You don't draft a young player if you don't accept to have some unproductive years from him.
As I mentioned above, any team wanting to trade for Scola would in all likelihood be put in heavy contact with his agent, so they'd know his demands.
Bad faith. Do you know what 'bad faith' means?
yes and I don't see why you put the "bad faith" label with Mahinmi and why you put him in the same sentence than Boozer who ahs broekn a promise made with Cleveland.
When a freshman or a HS player who isn't nba ready, enter in the draft, it's a bad faith move that give them a bad reputation for years ?
Spurs will be more bad faith in this scenario : a nba team waiting that its first round pick are productive to sign them.... Greedy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)