Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 141
  1. #26
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Bibby did not foul Kobe. The ball wasn't even thrown in yet. Bibby just has his hand out a little, getting ready to establish position, when Kobe popped him.

    The ref is the evil Bob Delaney, a crook and a liar who is in Stern's back pocket.
    The ball isn't even thrown in yet, that's a two shot foul and the ball.

    And I'm not sure how that is Bibby with just his hand out a little, he's clearly holding Kobe.

    And look at their feet, you can tell they were bodied up on that right side. Unless Bibby's arm is only 1 foot long, Bibby's hand is probably all the way up Kobe's butt-crack

    Don't get me wrong, Kobe's elbow is definitely a foul but so was Bibby's, Bibby's came first.

    Which one are you gonna call?
    Last edited by Allanon; 03-16-2009 at 07:24 PM.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    Wow, pretty good team was Sacramento that time. Bibby, Christie, Webber, Divac + young Hedo, Peya, Gerald Walllace. Sad that they get robbed.

  3. #28
    Ya'll Ready For This? G-Nob's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    2,074
    That's pretty upsetting.
    When Donahee came out and mentioned that particular game, I think I was even more upset. The problem was, Baveta was involved. Baveta may not have had any say in the game either way.

  4. #29
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    The ball isn't even thrown in yet, that's a two shot foul and the ball.

    And I'm not sure how that is Bibby with just his hand out a little, he's clearly holding Kobe. Bibby's hand is probably all the way up Kobe's butt-crack

    Don't get me wrong, Kobe's elbow is definitely a foul but so was Bibby's, Bibby's came first.

    Which one are you gonna call?
    He's not holding Kobe at all. Kobe initiated the contact.

  5. #30
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    26
    The ball isn't even thrown in yet, that's a two shot foul and the ball.

    And I'm not sure how that is Bibby with just his hand out a little, he's clearly holding Kobe. Bibby's hand is probably all the way up Kobe's butt-crack
    r u honestly trying to defend kobe's elbow? i dont know whether or not the nba is rigged but i do think that certain players like kobe and lebron to name a couple r given favorable treatment. but we have to remember that the nba is a business and unfortuntaly good guys like tim duncan do not get the respect because they aren't sexy enough.by the way kobe is the sleeziest most disgusting player in the nba.

  6. #31
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    He's not holding Kobe at all. Kobe initiated the contact.
    Whether or not Kobe initiated the contact, it's not OK to hold a player.

    And yes, unless Bibby's arm is only 1 foot long, he's holding Kobe pretty good. His forearm and hands are completely missing in the picture because he has them around Kobe's back.

    How can Bibby's hold on an out of bounds play, not be a two shot foul and the ball?

  7. #32
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    r u honestly trying to defend kobe's elbow? i dont know whether or not the nba is rigged but i do think that certain players like kobe and lebron to name a couple r given favorable treatment. but we have to remember that the nba is a business and unfortuntaly good guys like tim duncan do not get the respect because they aren't sexy enough.by the way kobe is the sleeziest most disgusting player in the nba.
    Kobe's elbow WAS a foul, I admit it. But I'm saying Bibby's hold was also a foul. Bibby fouled Kobe first.

    Who are you going to give the foul to?

    This picture of the hold came first, before the elbow:


  8. #33
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    Whether or not Kobe initiated the contact, it's not OK to hold a player.

    And yes, unless Bibby's arm is only 1 foot long, he's holding Kobe pretty good. His forearm and hands are completely missing in the picture because he has them around Kobe's back.

    How can Bibby's hold on an out of bounds play, not be a two shot foul and the ball?
    Bibby held him after he was hammered by Kobe.

  9. #34
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    26
    Kobe's elbow WAS a foul, I admit it. But I'm saying Bibby's hold was also a foul. Bibby fouled Kobe first.

    Who are you going to give the foul to?

    This picture of the hold came first, before the elbow:

    that "hold" that bibby is doing is done all the time in those types of end of game situations and they r never called. and u know kobe would have got the call if the roles were reversed. also if u look closely kobe's left arm is holding bibby's right arm down so bibby cannot gets his hands up to contest the pass.

  10. #35
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    Kobe's elbow WAS a foul, I admit it. But I'm saying Bibby's hold was also a foul. Bibby fouled Kobe first.

    Who are you going to give the foul to?

    This picture of the hold came first, before the elbow:

    You are a Lakers amd Kobe fan, not an objective observer. No one else sees what you see. For all I know, you are Bob Delaney going undercover, posting comments here under a fake name.

  11. #36
    Veteran Manufan909's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,049
    Wow, watching those videos make me sick.

  12. #37
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Game 6's officiating was too obvious. I don't even need to watch those youtubes 7 years later to remind me. It was too blatant. Everyone in the country outside of LA, was rooting for the Kings that series.
    Lousy Purple and Gold Sons of es.

    That series was probably the low point in the history of the NBA, as far as biased officiating. The league made all the video clips "disappear" for a reason. You'll note that they also made all the clips of Kermit Washington crushing Rudy T's face disappear as well. They just don't want evidence of those clouds hanging over the game. Personally, I think disposing of the evidence makes things look even worse. I'm surprised that any new clips have survived on Youtube, but they won't be there long.


    Well I challenge anyone reading this to do anything in 4 10ths of a second. No way you take a dribble pull the ball behind your head like fish does and beat the clock.
    Always start by giving credit to Derek Fisher for making that shot. If he didn't execute, there wouldn't be any controversy. That being said, I can tell you with absolute certainty that everyone in NBA management - including David Stern - knows that it took more than .4 seconds to make that shot. It's not hard to look at the frame-by-frame and determine that.

    The league was in a tough position, no matter which way they ruled. They made a conscious decision to not discuss how long the shot actually took, and only talk about whether or not the shot clock had expired before the ball left Fisher's fingertips.

    A season or two before, the league had done a very detailed study of how long it actually takes to get a shot off. They knew precisely which actions take how much time. They actually made a rule that anything other than a simple deflection, or catch-and-shoot while still in the air, was impossible in less than .4 seconds. If I remember right (and I think I do) the rule was that if the clock read less than .4, the game was over. Their instructions also said that the shot clock (including the red light around the backboard) is not the determinant of whether the game is over. The determining factor was supposed to be how much time had actually elapsed. That was to allow for the fact that the clock is operated by human hands, while actual time is an absolute.

    The main thing is that they knew, without any question, that the actions taken by Fisher take more than .4 seconds to execute. But they knew they were going to piss a bunch of people off no matter which way they ruled. They made a very conscious decision to choose the path that would hurt them the least. It was very pragmatic and, considering the position they were in, probably the best decision. But don't kid yourself. No one, outside of ignorant fans, has any illusion that the shot actually took only .4 seconds to accomplish.

    And exactly none of that matters. The Spurs lost. The Kings lost. The only reason for keeping either one alive is to try and make sure that neither happen again

  13. #38
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    26
    That series was probably the low point in the history of the NBA, as far as biased officiating. The league made all the video clips "disappear" for a reason. You'll note that they also made all the clips of Kermit Washington crushing Rudy T's face disappear as well. They just don't want evidence of those clouds hanging over the game. Personally, I think disposing of the evidence makes things look even worse. I'm surprised that any new clips have survived on Youtube, but they won't be there long.




    Always start by giving credit to Derek Fisher for making that shot. If he didn't execute, there wouldn't be any controversy. That being said, I can tell you with absolute certainty that everyone in NBA management - including David Stern - knows that it took more than .4 seconds to make that shot. It's not hard to look at the frame-by-frame and determine that.

    The league was in a tough position, no matter which way they ruled. They made a conscious decision to not discuss how long the shot actually took, and only talk about whether or not the shot clock had expired before the ball left Fisher's fingertips.

    A season or two before, the league had done a very detailed study of how long it actually takes to get a shot off. They knew precisely which actions take how much time. They actually made a rule that anything other than a simple deflection, or catch-and-shoot while still in the air, was impossible in less than .4 seconds. If I remember right (and I think I do) the rule was that if the clock read less than .4, the game was over. Their instructions also said that the shot clock (including the red light around the backboard) is not the determinant of whether the game is over. The determining factor was supposed to be how much time had actually elapsed. That was to allow for the fact that the clock is operated by human hands, while actual time is an absolute.

    The main thing is that they knew, without any question, that the actions taken by Fisher take more than .4 seconds to execute. But they knew they were going to piss a bunch of people off no matter which way they ruled. They made a very conscious decision to choose the path that would hurt them the least. It was very pragmatic and, considering the position they were in, probably the best decision. But don't kid yourself. No one, outside of ignorant fans, has any illusion that the shot actually took only .4 seconds to accomplish.

    And exactly none of that matters. The Spurs lost. The Kings lost. The only reason for keeping either one alive is to try and make sure that neither happen again
    +1 very well put.

  14. #39
    I just took a Dirk. Korny Earl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    100
    Personally I always keep that stuff in the back of my mind when I see bs calls going on. It seems to always come across during bigger games, clutch moments, when more is riding on the call. Which to me means the refs should be making exceptional calls but. I don't know, I try not to let it ruin my fun while watching the game. Its kind of like when George Bush was on TV I would always try not to think of the 9/11 conspiracies & the Michael Moore films etc.. I nearly divorced the NBA last year after the Fisher on Barry foul. Hopefully the Lakers - Celtics record breaking crap last year will hold them off for the Spurs return this year. Maybe not though.

  15. #40
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    That video has me convinced. Kobe hit Bibby in the face with his elbow like 30 times and he never got whistled once for it.

  16. #41
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    You are a Lakers amd Kobe fan, not an objective observer. No one else sees what you see. For all I know, you are Bob Delaney going undercover, posting comments here under a fake name.
    Objective is calling two fouls like they are.

    Bibby held Kobe (foul 1)
    Kobe elbowed Bibby (foul 2)

    Both are fouls no matter how you slice it.

    Being non-objective is like me saying Kobe didn't foul Bibby, he did.
    Being non-objective is like you saying Bibby didn't foul Kobe, he did.

    Bibby's obviously came first, I don't see how with that picture it can be said that Kobe fouled Bibby first. Bibby is holding Kobe way before Kobe's elbow came.

    How are you going to call a foul on Kobe without calling the foul on Bibby first? If Bibby wasn't holding Kobe, he wouldn't have gotten elbowed.

    Chicken before the egg.

  17. #42
    Wag kang makulit! jmard5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,225
    That video has me convinced. Kobe hit Bibby in the face with his elbow like 30 times and he never got whistled once for it.
    Hmm. I also see Bibby got hit 5 times, no whistles also. I'll view it again.


  18. #43
    In Manu we STILL trust! rayray2k8's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    5,635
    Oh wow!
    A report from almost a year ago about a game that happened 7 years ago!
    How is this spurs related?
    Spurs beat the Lakers in 2003 and then L.A. came back the next year only
    to crumble away to the Pistons...
    Kings just couldn't get it down in game 7 at home...

  19. #44
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    20,120
    The Lakers most definitely get more calls when they need them and deserve them as opposed to probably 20 of the other teams in the League. The economy has scared stern n less, small market teams without a marketable star will not be doing well for a couple years, guaranteed.
    Stern wants Kobe vs. LeBron in the Finals...book it.

  20. #45
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    Objective is calling two fouls like they are.

    Bibby held Kobe (foul 1)
    Kobe elbowed Bibby (foul 2)

    Both are fouls no matter how you slice it.

    Being non-objective is like me saying Kobe didn't foul Bibby, he did.
    Being non-objective is like you saying Bibby didn't foul Kobe, he did.

    Bibby's obviously came first, I don't see how with that picture it can be said that Kobe fouled Bibby first. Bibby is holding Kobe way before Kobe's elbow came.

    How are you going to call a foul on Kobe without calling the foul on Bibby first? If Bibby wasn't holding Kobe, he wouldn't have gotten elbowed.

    Chicken before the egg.
    and what about the others 30 calls that the refs invent in favor of the Lakers? and you can see in those videos that they were bull calls in favor of the Lakers.

  21. #46
    Straya AussieFanKurt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,065
    i dont understand why leagues have to be rigged, its more exciting if its real not fixed.

  22. #47
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    8,349
    The refs raped the Kings in this game . When Vlade was laughing at Pollard fouling out on the ridiculous call it gave me flashbacks of Duncan laughing on the bench before Joey Crawford threw him out lol.

    I've never seen so many touch fouls in my life in the 4th qtr lol. Funderburke couldn't even lay a hand on Shaq without the whistle blowing. That just got LA into the penalty quick. The Horry flop on Webber was equally ridiculous. The Divac foul that got him out of the game was garbage. Kobe with his patented verbal flop to get the call after he was blocked clean. The elbow to Bibby's mug was the icing. Man, it's easy to see how blatantly fixed this game was. It was like the refs weren't even trying to hide it lol.

  23. #48
    Straya AussieFanKurt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,065
    what do you all think of this if you havent seen it already
    Stephen A talking about officiating: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWbUF...eature=related

  24. #49
    Straya AussieFanKurt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,065
    he states that Joey is one of the very greatest refs out there

  25. #50
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,599
    i've seen these videos before, they appear and disappear ever so often on youtube. the foul by bibby after kobe shot the technical free throw in the first video was ridiculous. bibby didn't even touch bryant. and for those that are arguing kobe's elbow to bibby's nose, it looked like they wrapped each other at the exact same time. since kobe bulldozed bibby, it should have been a foul on bryant. the fouls where vlade just stands behind shaq are always funny yet sad at the same time.

    i always found it interesting why videos of this game or even clips showing just the fouls always end up deleted. there are thousands of self made clips of nba games that are never removed. there are videos that criticize the officiating like last year's duncan ejection by crawford still up. so why does the nba only target this game? i can think of other nba videos that mysteriously disappear like the palace brawl where artest goes ape but that's because the nba hides it so it doesn't damage its reputation. by removing this video, the nba is practically admitting there is something to hide. videos of this game always mysteriously disappear whenever i search for it in the future.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •