Reply With Quote
homerism at its finest.
Hill is a nice fluky player that has his moments, good defender and nice sized i might add.
But I guess Trevor Ariza is better than Manu, and Scola > TD also right
Yes
No
I agree, i think right now Brooks is the better shooter, passer and penetrator, and from what i´ve seen he will improve a little bit more, mainly on finishing at the rim where he is yet to find a good shoot to take advatage of his speed (consistent floater or lyups), he has a great JS by the way.
But i also think Brooks has matured a lot more out of necessity than Hill and Hill has a lot of room to improve also given his heigh advantage as a PG.
I think defense is some of the thoughest things to teach and this is why i would keep Hill over Brooks for this team.
The Rox wouldn´t even be near the PO if they had Hill instead of Brooks.
homerism at its finest.
Hill is a nice fluky player that has his moments, good defender and nice sized i might add.
But I guess Trevor Ariza is better than Manu, and Scola > TD also right
Brooks has started for 1 NBA SEASON. Thats it, he's actually only played 2, and he had to do a lot of it with Hayes, brickattier, and Brikiza.
Didn't vote. There is no NO option.
homerism at its finest.
Hill is a nice fluky player that has his moments, good defender and nice sized i might add.
But I guess Trevor Ariza is better than Manu, and Scola > TD also right
Don't act like you haven't seen it.
Surely not. AB's FG is too low and as he has speed, he still keeps shooting, shooting, shooting again and again.
George Hill is an interesting prospect for SAS' roster, in some games he is showing maturity an excellent handling, he also started to have a good shot sellection.
I'd love to see a balanced minutes among TP, Manu, George as PG.
For the record I wouldn't make business with those reds
nope....coz brooks cant play defense like hill does......
Tony's still fairly young so Georges adds something else in a very interesting guard rotation of Manu, Tony and him. AB would be quite redundant with Tony.
TO THE NO!
I prefer a hard nosed Defender.... so how about NO..
If Brooks can guard Kevin Durant effectively then sure.
There is no Manu successor.
Hill has a higher ceiling than brooks. He is just a better all around player than Brooks. Brooks is quick and can score in bunches, but he doesn't have the defensive potential of Hill and Hill is going to improve in his deficient areas because he is a hard worker. Whoever made the Gary Payton comparison is spot on.
Hill
More athletic, way better defensively
Hilllllllllllllllllllll No!
Hill's ability on Defense and overall potential are far better.
Actually I asked this incorrectly, I was meaning as your starting PG.
Taking Parker out of the equation, would you rather have Hill or Brooks?
DD
Aaron Brooks is better than hill but we want hill
Hill will be a better player than Brooks. I think Hill also has more upside.
Hill, ie.. Manu, and Hill plays the SG on offense.
i honestly have been saying this since last year, look up my freaking post, hill is going to be way better than parker and should be able to replace parker by nextr season, sounds crazy but his growth is amazing and if given more minutes will become alot better than parker, he plays on both sides of the court unlike tp
Redundant much?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
