Would you trade George Hill for Aaron Brooks?

[DaDakota]

I was curious? They are different types of players, AB is a scoring PG like Tony Parker....but with range.

Would you guys trade Hill for AB?

DD

[DesignatedT]

i dont think so. as much as AB is a great player there might be more upside with George.. IMO

but thats tough.

[DaDakota]

I know, Hill is a nice player, but AB is too, they are just two different types of players.

AB is a 20ppg player now and his assist totals are going up...heck, he had no one to pass to in the first half of the year.

Hill looks good too....I like his defense, but how is his shooting?

DD

[Cant_Be_Faded]

ing
No

[jestersmash]

Hill is the future successor of Parker's place in the "big 3." DeJuan Blair unfortunately does not have the size to be the successor of Duncan. I guess he doesn't have the ACLs either...

We need Ricky Rubio here, he'd be perfect as the future successor for Ginobili's spot in the big 3.

[Buddy Holly]

Where's the no option?

[Buddy Holly]

I know, Hill is a nice player, but AB is too, they are just two different types of players.

AB is a 20ppg player now and his assist totals are going up...heck, he had no one to pass to in the first half of the year.

Hill looks good too....I like his defense, but how is his shooting?

DD

If there were no Duncan or Manu or Jefferson or Parker, Hill would be a 20+ ppg player right now as well.

[Stringer_Bell]

I'll take Hill's defense and efficiency over Brooks scoring 20 per game.

[DesignatedT]

I know, Hill is a nice player, but AB is too, they are just two different types of players.

AB is a 20ppg player now and his assist totals are going up...heck, he had no one to pass to in the first half of the year.

Hill looks good too....I like his defense, but how is his shooting?

DD

hes shooting 40% from 3 pt land on the year. i know brooks can hit the 3 ball. hill is by far the superior defender.

[arodz]

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NO!!!

[TDMVPDPOY]

does aaron brooks even have his own nude pics upload to the net like ghill3? then no

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Aaron Brooks looks like an emaciated re ed half brother of Keenan Ivory Wayans.

[8FOR!3]

You couldn't give me Martin and Scola for him. You can keep your bottle Rockets.

[Juanobili]

nah

[Xevious]

does aaron brooks even have his own nude pics upload to the net like ghill3? then no

[L.I.T]

You couldn't give me Martin and Scola for him. You can keep your bottle Rockets.

I hope that's a joke. My sarcasm meter has been the fritz lately.

But anyway, I wouldn't trade Hill for AB at this point. AB is a great offensive player and can score in bunches. But, his assist levels leave much to be desired and his isn't much of a defender. Hill will never be a top-notch facilitator, but he has more upside than AB in that category and definitely has the ability to be a far superior defender (even if he is inconsistent at this point).

Hill has the ability to be a Hersey Hawkins-esque two way player, while AB will probably top out as a volume/explosive scorer.

If anything AB's future might be as a serious scoring sixth man in the Jason Terry mold.

[TDMVPDPOY]

ghill3 is the second coming of gary payton without the loudmouth and post game....

[Refocus]

Aaron Brooks is a straight up baller.. but we have Parker already so I'm cool with having Hill.

[noob cake]

I would do it in a second as Rockets fan. Brooks is NOT a point guard and constantly gets raped on defense.

[Blackjack]

Big ol'

[Xevious]

I would do it in a second as Rockets fan. Brooks is NOT a point guard and constantly gets raped on defense.

Hill isn't a PG either. And though he's a good defender and has long arms, he's pretty under-sized for a SG. That said, I'd rather have Hill than Brooks.

[noob cake]

Hill isn't a PG either. And though he's a good defender and has long arms, he's pretty under-sized for a SG. That said, I'd rather have Hill than Brooks.

I'll take a bigger (albeit worse shooting) SG who can play defense over Brooks any day.

[NFGIII]

I'll take Hill's defense and efficiency over Brooks scoring 20 per game.

Exactly. He's a more overall player than Brooks. When getting regular minutes Hillcan score but it's his D that makes him a much more valuable player than Brooks.

I would do it in a second as Rockets fan. Brooks is NOT a point guard and constantly gets raped on defense.

He's a SG in an undersized body. If you could get a legit PG then he would be a valuable piece coming off the bench. 2nd units always needs instant scoring to be effective. Or he could be interchangeable with Lowry but as of now the Rockets really don't have a legit starting PG. I think Brooks would feel better if that responsibility was given to someone else.

[kaji157]

If i could i would trade Tony Parker for Brooks straight up if we were to rebuild, they are similar and i think Hill-Brooks would be a heck of a backcourt.
But only if we were to trade all the Big 3.

I see Hill more as the Manu successor than Parker´s.

[bigdog]

Brooks is a nice player, but Hill has more potential as an all-around player than Brooks. Brooks is a better shooter, but Hill is, in my opinion, a better finisher around the rim. I also think that both players aren't true PG's, but Hill IMO has better PG skills. , I think Hill could be a 20 ppg scorer even with Duncan, RJ, Manu, and Parker in there.

All in all, I vote a No.