I like Nazr, but Rasho should be starter

[Rick Von Braun]

It was never Pop's way in the past to have a player lose his job to injury.

Manu - Hedo, 2004.

If Rasho is healthy, and Nazr struggles, then Rasho should be the starter again. Simple and fair to both parties.

But why do you guys care? Why is this "fair"?

I thought starting didn't matter. This is what most people preach here in this board. I am confused.

[Jimcs50]

Manu - Hedo, 2004.

But why do you guys care? Why is this "fair"?

I thought starting didn't matter. This is what most people preach here in this board. I am confused.

I never preach

The Hedo situation was different...Hedo could not come off bench and play well. Nazr can play well off the bench.

I could care less who starts, but if Rasho plays well starting, then let him start....no skin off my nose either way...I do have a life outside Spurs' bball you know....I know Iknow, 21,000 posts belies this statement...but you know what I mean.

[Solid D]

Starting isn't that important. It's more about matchups and combinations that work. Closing is certainly more important than starting, when the games are close.

I do like it when Rasho is in there to seal for Manu and Parker when they run the screen-rolls with the other big. He's the best at that, of all the Spurs.