Strange that you ranted about how stupid WC is but then your final conclusion is exactly what he said several posts back.
they should call it the white flag list.
Strange that you ranted about how stupid WC is but then your final conclusion is exactly what he said several posts back.
Umm not its not. He basically passed it off as it was no big deal. He even used the buzzword: fear-mongering.
I concluded that it was very dangerous because NaOH is one of the strongest bases there is.
LOL what? You must be the only one who can see that post. Mind linking to it?
Stupidity like that is why I had to place him on IGNORE.
Just like you and FL both did, WC stressed the danger of pH.
Stressed? He mentioned it after others did but stressed is not what he did considering how he tried to blow it off the fist time he mentioned it.
Yeah, it seems like he minimized it.
No, other than the flooding effect of the nasty red stuff that I didn't mention, it was the only concern I had of it. Need I stress a level of facts, to make them more or less a fact? Did I disagree with anything true?
What are you getting at?
You suggested the OP was lacking factually and was pumping fear without pointing out exactly how, but ironically, you also ended up parroting one of its main points.
Maybe I went overboard there, but I did read the way it pointed out heavy metals as something people would fear. Low and behold... look what someone then quoted:
Moreover it may contain about 7 radionuclides such as U, Ra, Th, K, Cs, etc and about 5 anions, fluoride, phosphate, chloride, nitrate and sulphate.
Heavy metals are no joke, but without detailed info about concentrations I can see speculating that might be fear-mongering.
Given the volume of the spill and the imminent possibility of another one, I wouldn't be too quick to make that speculation myself.
Me either, but people do. Thing is, they never added things like heavy metals to get the alumina. It was already there, in what is otherwise in essence, red clay in a rock form, as I pointed out in my first post. Only the caustic Sodium hydroxide appears to be added, but I did state in my second post:I know what these chemicals can do. I have worked with 13.5 PH KOH.Still, it depends on their refining process.
Pointing out the radioactive elements is disconcerting, and disingenuous to me. Nearly all natural minerals are radioactive. Consider this:
Hungary red mud disaster biggest in the world, environmental impacts unforeseeable:
Talking about the heavy metal and lead content, and the radioactivity of red mud is but scare-mongering.Someone has a great deal of bulldozing and shipping to pay for.As a result of developments in the last twenty years, it has been proved that red mud can be partly neutralized with various agents, including sea water or gypsum (can also be obtained as a waste).
For instance, red mud has been disposed of in the sea in France, Greece and Japan for several years. Sea water neutralizes the causticity of red mud. No bioac ulation of chemicals was found on fish and sandworm using a diet containing 10% bauxite residue.
The resulting material has several favourable features, among others:
- high acid neutralising capacity
- high cyanide and toxic heavy metal trapping capacity
- not hazardous any more.
For those of you worried about radioactivity:
Granite Countertops Contain Radioactive Minerals
Uranium, thorium, and potassium are just some of the radioactive minerals that might be in a granite countertop. As countertops are used, they emit radon and radiation into the near vicinity. Radon is the #2 leading cause of lung cancer.
Considering how much speculation goes into the war on terrorism and the dire predictions involved, not sure if WC wants to actually call this fear mongering...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)