Reduce Legal Immigration

[Winehole23]

Americans if we can't compete with hungry foreigners. If we're not hungry enough, persistent enough and hard working enough, us. We deserve to lose.

[Wild Cobra]

Americans if we can't compete with hungry foreigners. If we're not hungry enough, persistent enough and hard working enough, us. We deserve to lose.

LOL...

OK, I'm with you under one condition.

We trade one lazy ass person on long term welfare, who use it as a way of life, and is able bodied, for each immigrant hungry for work.

[Winehole23]

There's not enough able-bodied lifer deadbeats on the dole to trade for all the immigrants we'll need.

[Winehole23]

And anyway, wouldn't it be much easier just to shoot socially worthless indigents?

[Wild Cobra]

There's not enough able-bodied lifer deadbeats on the dole to trade for all the immigrants we'll need.

Good...

We will be down to zero.

Maybe 1 a to 3 exchange?

1 to 10? What would the proper ratio be?

[Wild Cobra]

And anyway, wouldn't it be much easier just to shoot socially worthless indigents?

Easier, yes. Right, no.

[Winehole23]

Then why shoot hungry, ambitious immigrants at the border? It couldn't be much less wrong morally than slaughtering shiftless Americans on relief

[m>s]

the world's population now totals 7 billion imho at least 6 billion of them would want to live in america instead of the pisshole where they were born and raised, they're all "hungry" foreigners and would've worked much harder/better then americans do if given the equal chances. if you were lucky enough to be american-born, i say cherish it and don't it up.

america was rural as in the early ages, when european explorers arrived and started to make changes. there was a time when the rural america needed immigrants but that time is long gone imho

[Wild Cobra]

Then why shoot hungry, ambitious immigrants at the border? It couldn't be much less wrong morally than slaughtering shiftless Americans on relief

Because from a defense standpoint, it is an invasion. As long as we allow it, it will continue. We need some deterrent, and nothing to date has worked.

Have you seen the numbers of legal immigration we already allow? If you think we need more immigration, than advocate increasing that number, please. Help put a stop to illegal immigration by sympathizing with them. If we sympathize with the whole world's people in need, we may as well allow 500 million a year in illegal immigration.

When is enough, enough?

[m>s]

the problems we're suffering today are mostly caused by the overload of immigrants not the lack of them imho

[Wild Cobra]

the world's population now totals 7 billion imho at least 6 billion of them would want to live in america instead of the pisshole where they were born and raised, they're all "hungry" foreigners and would've worked much harder/better then americans do if given the equal chances. if you were lucky enough to be american-born, i say cherish it and don't it up.

america was rural as in the early ages, when european explorers arrived and started to make changes. there was a time when the rural america needed immigrants but that time is long gone imho

Now here is one of your few posts I agree with.

Now we don't need more immigration, except to remind others what people see in our nation. I also believe we can add to our population if we can restore jobs here. I still don't see politicians addressing the root problems, to restore jobs.

[m>s]

Because from a defense standpoint, it is an invasion. As long as we allow it, it will continue. We need some deterrent, and nothing to date has worked.

Have you seen the numbers of legal immigration we already allow? If you think we need more immigration, than advocate increasing that number, please. Help put a stop to illegal immigration by sympathizing with them. If we sympathize with the whole world's people in need, we may as well allow 500 million a year in illegal immigration.

When is enough, enough?

which just rebuts your own false statements you made earlier this morning imho

[Wild Cobra]

the problems we're suffering today are mostly caused by the overload of immigrants not the lack of them imho

No, they are not a problem. Our own lazy ass citizens are.

[m>s]

Now here is one of your few posts I agree with.

Now we don't need more immigration, except to remind others what people see in our nation. I also believe we can add to our population if we can restore jobs here. I still don't see politicians addressing the root problems, to restore jobs.

if you are american-born then its your god-given right to enjoy your life here, don't say its unfair to them "hungry" foreigners there ain't no true justice in the world tbh

[Wild Cobra]

if you are american-born then its your god-given right to enjoy your life here, don't say its unfair to them "hungry" foreigners there ain't no true justice in the world tbh

I don't think you understand the "melting pot" concept. Do you?

[m>s]

No, they are not a problem. Our own lazy ass citizens are.

young lads just want to maintain the standard of life that their parents used to have, that ain't no luxury imho. immigrants are more preferable in today's workforce because they don't complain about low wages/over-time working, and thats why there're so many young lads coming out of school with degrees but unemployed

globalization caused the whole imho, them globalists

[Wild Cobra]

young lads just want to maintain the standard of life that their parents used to have, that ain't no luxury imho. immigrants are more preferable in today's workforce because they don't complain about low wages/over-time working, and thats why there're so many young lads coming out of school with degrees but unemployed

globalization caused the whole imho, them globalists

So...

You are another, who instead of attacking the root problem, attacks a symptom.

[mavs>spurs]

them globalists

stop repeating stuff you heard me say brah, when I say globalists I don't mean people who propose a global economy. globalists = new world order, 1 world government advocates, etc..