Reply With Quote
No civilians killed by Obama's drone attacks: so explain this
ing fat ass naive idiots. War isn't a football game. During WWII hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed. Other than the children, there are no non-militants in the ME. It's not like there's a standing army with official NATO sanctioned Taliban uniforms and clearly drawn battle lines. They hide amongst their people, and they kill our people. They trained people to come here and kill 3000 people, would have been more if they weren't so stupid to do it so early in the morning.
No I don't give a if we wipe them out. Cry elsewhere.
No civilians killed by Obama's drone attacks: so explain this
you're a horrible human being
I'm not going to sit here and deny I can come across as smug but I literally LOLed that you of all people decided to toss that stone because the glass house you built on that front is quite impressive. Lecture us some more about what you care about and what we should care about again?You are really full of yourself. I post this stuff because I truly care about these things. You sometimes have some quality posts about some issues, but a lot of the time you simply are just an ass and like insulting people with your drive by comments. Imo, when discussing the next President, I think these mass murders are probably the most important issues to be discussing. Most of your pompous bs has been annoying for years, yet I don't go around and take a shot at you all the time in all your threads and laugh about it. Funny that YOU would talk about someone being annoying. At the end of all this gibberish, these kids are still being killed, but yet it's annoying to hear about, oh and it's in a youtube so it doesn't matter.
There are situations that are going to kill millions over the next decades and somehow drones are the most important subject. Ok. If you and your youtubes say so then it must be so.
Its not like people here don't care. I don't think a single of the smarter posters here thinks this is trivial and its been discussed many times before. Your youtubes aren't going to somehow make someone here ll of sudden think that killing children with rockets is bad because they already do.
The political youtube is ridiculous because it tries to dumb down a complex political issue into some pictures and words. Hey look, here's some guy saying his child died and how much it sucked. Also, the sky in the video is blue.
If you want to discuss drone strikes then cool. I think most people here are down with that. But don't act like like you're somehow opening everyone's eyes with youtubes saying that killing children with bombs is bad. I mean really?
Also, the reason like airplane windows gets discussed is because thats what is entertaining. El Nono isn't going into a ing voting booth and deciding to vote because Mitt Romney said something re ed about an airplane window. If Mitt Romney where to come out with some kind of pledge tomorrow that said he would not continue the wars and that we all knew he was serious you think anyone here who is rational would consider the airplane window thing more important?
PS - more people in America have died via starvation since drone attacks started than civilians in drone strikes. Starvation. In. America.
Meh, I talked about collateral a lot of times in the past... the point is just moot at this time simply because both candidates are warmongers, so we'll be looking at more of the same for the next 4 years. And no, Ron Paul isn't running nor winning anything. Ever.
When will you ever get over yourself man? It's funny how it bothers you so much. So all you basically have to really say is "youtubes"
People discuss a bunch of in here, it's the political forum. How else do you want me to discuss illegal drone wars, tell me again how YOU would like me to do it since youtubes aren't allowed? His war and killing which is what he ran against 4 years ago and YOU voted for him, is the most important thing because it all ties in to our economy, education, our police state, poverty, etc. All that money could go towards so many other things. Who the heck are you to decide how I should conform to your way of posting? No youtubes? Pfft. People like you dumb down the . It's simple. The killing is uncons utional, it's flat out wrong, it's murder. What are you really arguing here if you sort of agree, you have turned this thread into all about your baby crying of me bringing up a subject and how I do it.
If I didn't use the line "what most people like to ignore", you would still talk about me posting a youtube. If I posted an article instead you would still talk or ignore it. Why? The article would cover what's in the youtube. What scares you about a video anyway? That visuals of dead babies is too real for you? Maybe it should be. Damn dude, you seriously seem like you need some soul searching. You don't think I should post youtubes of babies we murder, why not? Go ahead Manny, keep making this about your personal distaste for me and how it makes you feel about yourself, rather than the subject. You say it's been discussed before. Of course.. so what, the talk shouldn't stop at all.
It's only a matter of time before one of your fellow trolls comes in here to tag team with you, and after all the trolling the issue of murdered families is still true and it should be part of the National discussion in this election.
Last edited by SA210; 09-28-2012 at 01:56 AM.
Back to the issues..
If only the media kept this going..
Jake Tapper vs. Jay Carney on President Killing U.S. Citizens.
My question is this. How do you know we really killing innocents? What these people say could be lies.
so, the 176 children killed in Pakistan were all presumptively legit targets in your view.
I question if this actually occurred, or if people not liking the US told the investigator what they wanted to hear.
What evidence have you seen that is proof the children were actually killed?
It's pretty ridiculous for you to deny innocent kids are being killed with these illegal drone strikes. This is a known fact.
Start watching after the 5 minute mark to the end. I know you have at least 5 to 6 minutes to watch. I'm sure you will still deny it after watching though.
OK, I started watching. Just after the 5 minute mark, there is an explosion.
How do you know for a fact it was from us? Because the cameraman says so?
I said watch after the 5 minute mark to the END. You obviously didn't because I watched it and you had already replied. It's obvious you just don't want to believe it. Watch the kids you don't believe are being blown up by the USA.
whats really crazy is some ppl still believe bombing those mother ers actually make us safer here. here in places like Memphis, TN, Savanna, GA
all these bombs are nothing more than just a business decision in some corporate office by some defense contractors. its a BUSINESS and a big business. someone has to buy the weapons, and use the weapons so they can buy again.
wake up. none of this make you any safer at home at all
oh and those brushing off Obama the Warmonger. Hussein ran on the premise of "change" and no more wars.
he is actually turned out a bigger liar than W. much bigger.
Sorry. They could have been blown up by anyone.
the "change" of ACA in the face of Repug obstructionism is great, and stopping wars that dubya started and greedy, career-padding, wealth-sucking MIC is damn near impossible.
Bull nobody had a gun on Hussein's head when he was signing the NDAA
lindsey graham, may you rot in
Jesus, what the f is this country doing to itself..
me... you mean bombs are actually killing people ?
Obama blew up Awlaki's 16 year old son, a US citizen. what had he done to deserve it?
Yea, illegally
Bull . Obama ran on ending the war in Iraq and re-focusing on sending troops to Afghanistan. That's not "no more wars".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions