Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52
  1. #26
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    26,183

  2. #27
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    Lakers will be fine come playoffs. and yes, they will make the playoffs.
    I agree they will probably make a later seed, but I read they will be fine come playoffs, what is FINE? LE RUN? Fine to me means they are going to make a major run! Some said the Spurs will be fine a few times, them times early exits! What is fine? Thunder round one? Clippers round one? Spurs round one? How is that fine?

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    There's no guarantee they will make the playoffs unless another team totally collapses. They still have some of their toughest schedule left. They haven't shown the ability to beat any good teams.

  4. #29
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,363
    Bottom line, they got Marc Gasol. He is like 5 years younger and appears to have higher ceiling as a true center than Pau as a Center being forced to played PF. That trade gets killed for no reason. I hate Stern as much as the next guy, but that trade can't be included especially when they aren't gonna make the post season and the Griz are going to finish no worse than 5th in the west.

    The Lakers moved Vlade for Kobe you can't bash a trade immediately after it happens. Wait a couple of seasons and then go to town.

    Marc Gasol was a last second throw-in to make the numbers work... he wasn't the center piece of that swap, not even the 'sweetner' in the deal. For all intents and purposes Kwame Brown and Pau Gasol were being traded for one another... the fact that Marc Gasol eventually panned out doesn't change the fact that the trade was nothing short of 'grand larceny'. And what made matters worse is that it didn't allow the Grizz to shed any salary (as would have occurred if they had considered Toronto's or Indiana's preliminary propositions - ones that couldn't even be placed on the table given that the Lakers came out of no where to steal the older Gasol brother well before the trade deadline at a time when no one was making deals yet).

  5. #30
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    2-10 in their last 10 games? wat

  6. #31
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    And with the Blazers and Rockets in free fall, it's very possible the Lakers sneak in as the 8th seed

  7. #32
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Post Count
    418
    Getting into the playoff might be what the Lakers need to wake up, they're playing way below capacity

  8. #33
    U Have Bad Understanding Sportcamper's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Post Count
    9,327
    Hogwash!

    Everyone and their mother knows that the Lakers are going to flip the switch any minute now and rip off like 32 wins in a row... Howard's going to start racking up triple doubles while Kobe becomes an assist monster... Just wait 'til Jordan Hill gets back...

  9. #34
    PRICELESS SPURS FAN polandprzem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    16,433

  10. #35
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    And with the Blazers and Rockets in free fall, it's very possible the Lakers sneak in as the 8th seed
    Dallas is going to get hot and make a run. Lakers done. Rockets will make post season too.

  11. #36
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Marc Gasol was a last second throw-in to make the numbers work... he wasn't the center piece of that swap, not even the 'sweetner' in the deal. For all intents and purposes Kwame Brown and Pau Gasol were being traded for one another... the fact that Marc Gasol eventually panned out doesn't change the fact that the trade was nothing short of 'grand larceny'. And what made matters worse is that it didn't allow the Grizz to shed any salary (as would have occurred if they had considered Toronto's or Indiana's preliminary propositions - ones that couldn't even be placed on the table given that the Lakers came out of no where to steal the older Gasol brother well before the trade deadline at a time when no one was making deals yet).
    Just cause he wasn't the center piece of the deal, is completely irrelevant, he was still apart of the deal. The Grizzlies have a bright future with Marc Gasol, who is only 27. True centers like him can produce at a high clip into their near to mid 30's. With Conley and Gay the can still contend after ZBO is done. Karma's a The Lakers may be forced to take pennies on the dollar because Pau can't fit with the new system.

  12. #37
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Just cause he wasn't the center piece of the deal, is completely irrelevant, he was still apart of the deal.
    It's completely relevant. At the time of the trade, he was an unknown quality with very little value. It was a lop-sided trade. Theres no getting over that. Gasol's emergence prevented it from being one of the most lop-sided trades in history, but that's in hindsight.

  13. #38
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,565
    Phil Jackson must be thanking his lucky stars (yet again).

  14. #39
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    It's completely relevant. At the time of the trade, he was an unknown quality with very little value. It was a lop-sided trade. Theres no getting over that. Gasol's emergence prevented it from being one of the most lop-sided trades in history, but that's in hindsight.
    In the end they got a all star big man by trading an older all star, that can't be debated.

    Agree to disagree.

  15. #40
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    In the end they got a all star big man by trading an older all star, that can't be debated.

    Agree to disagree.
    Uh, no. You clearly don't understand how to look at something without applying hindsight to it. Gasol hadn't been picked yet. It was a ty trade for Memphis. The piece of the trade that homers used to defend it was Javaris Crittenton. THAT'S how bad a trade it was.

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    What is this nonsense? Are people trying to defend that sham Gasol trade?

    Bottom line:

    Before the trade, The Lakers were 1st round losers, and the Grizzlies were only 1 injured season from being 1st round losers.

    5 years since:

    Lakers:

    Finals appearance
    Champions
    Champions
    2nd round
    2nd round

    Grizzlies
    lotto
    lotto
    lotto
    2nd round, won in 1st because Pop torpedoed Splitter all damn year
    1st round losers

    1 series win in 5 years somehow trumps 2 les and a Finals run? Please.

  17. #42
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    Back to the topic

    I still am convinced the Lakers make the playoffs. They keep losing games but they're not losing ground.

    Rockets falling apart. Portland falling apart. Minnesota fell apart. These teams are refusing to make the Lakers pay.

  18. #43
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Phil Jackson must be thanking his lucky stars (yet again).
    Why? He would do a much better job. D'Antoni has no clue what he's doing. Even Mike Brown would do a better job. He would feed the post. D'Antoni doesn't have the athletes or 3pt shooters to implement his offense.

  19. #44
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Back to the topic

    I still am convinced the Lakers make the playoffs. They keep losing games but they're not losing ground.

    Rockets falling apart. Portland falling apart. Minnesota fell apart. These teams are refusing to make the Lakers pay.
    You have to look at the schedules. I think the Lakers probably have the toughest part of their schedule left.

  20. #45
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Why? He would do a much better job. D'Antoni has no clue what he's doing. Even Mike Brown would do a better job. He would feed the post. D'Antoni doesn't have the athletes or 3pt shooters to implement his offense.
    Exactly. Mike D'Antoni caught lightning in a bottle with the Suns. He had five guys who could play 40 minutes a night. Nash and Amare could run the pick and roll, Marion could run on the break and score without plays called for him, Joe Johnson (and later Barbosa) could pass and create his own shot, and Q Richardson (and later Raja Bell) could camp out and hit threes. They didn't have a bench, they didn't play defense, and they couldn't play half court. We all heard his adjustments on the sideline ("let's go, guys"). Everyone but the guy who hired him knew he was going to be a disaster.


    You have to look at the schedules. I think the Lakers probably have the toughest part of their schedule left.
    QFT. The Lakers have been treading water with what should be the cupcake part of their schedule. They still have the Grammy road trip next week.

  21. #46
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    Phil Jackson must be thanking his lucky stars (yet again).
    Jackson, probably, thinks it's precisely because he isn't there, that everything is falling apart....

  22. #47
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Uh, no. You clearly don't understand how to look at something without applying hindsight to it. Gasol hadn't been picked yet. It was a ty trade for Memphis. The piece of the trade that homers used to defend it was Javaris Crittenton. THAT'S how bad a trade it was.
    Did you read any of my posts? I said that trades can't be looked at in terms of immediate winners or losers. Take the Dwight Howard trade.

    What if Howard leaves the Lakers in the off season for Dallas, Houston or his hometown (where his close friends with Josh Smith is ) Atlanta. All of a sudden that move for to trade for Howard becomes worthless because they gave up a 1st rounder and Bynum ( who is currently hurt) to get him. If he returns and plays well and becomes a star player for them going forward that looks like a bad trade for the Lakers

    The Magic got Afflalo, Nicholson & 3 1st rounders. Both have played fairly well and what happens if those picks turn in to rotation players or become trade chips for better assets. Better yet since they don't have Howard they are in the lottery where they can trade up or even acquire another lottery pick because they have the flexibility to do so.

    The Lakers already drafted Marc Gasol, in the 2007 draft with the 47th pick, so the Grizzlies knew exactly who they were acquiring. Gasol was traded in the following season.

    I'm also a Spurs fan if you're wondering, i just hate when people simplify complicated things.

  23. #48
    Veteran temujin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,408
    Did you read any of my posts? I said that trades can't be looked at in terms of immediate winners or losers. Take the Dwight Howard trade.

    What if Howard leaves the Lakers in the off season for Dallas, Houston or his hometown (where his close friends with Josh Smith is ) Atlanta. All of a sudden that move for to trade for Howard becomes worthless because they gave up a 1st rounder and Bynum ( who is currently hurt) to get him. If he returns and plays well and becomes a star player for them going forward that looks like a bad trade for the Lakers

    The Magic got Afflalo, Nicholson & 3 1st rounders. Both have played fairly well and what happens if those picks turn in to rotation players or become trade chips for better assets. Better yet since they don't have Howard they are in the lottery where they can trade up or even acquire another lottery pick because they have the flexibility to do so.

    The Lakers already drafted Marc Gasol, in the 2007 draft with the 47th pick, so the Grizzlies knew exactly who they were acquiring. Gasol was traded in the following season.

    I'm also a Spurs fan if you're wondering, i just hate when people simplify complicated things.
    Marc Gasol was an average player in Spain in 2007, and a second rounder.
    His value was less than Blair's.
    Spurs tried to shop Blair for first rounder and failed.

    Much less get a Love in exchange.

    It's called business, and the NBA is a business in which the Lakers are supposed to be on top.
    No matter what.
    Period.

  24. #49
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Marc Gasol was an average player in Spain in 2007, and a second rounder.
    His value was less than Blair's.
    Spurs tried to shop Blair for first rounder and failed.

    Much less get a Love in exchange.

    It's called business, and the NBA is a business in which the Lakers are supposed to be on top.
    No matter what.
    Period.

    Wasn't Marc playing in the 2nd best league in the world while Blair was playing in a glorified D-League? (the joke known as NCAA Basketball) He was taken in 2007, not sure who you even brought up blair who was in '09. That 2007 draft, was actually pretty good overall.


    Hey, remember that time when they got hammered by Detroit in the Finals? and then Shaq, Fischer, Payton, Malone, Foxx & Phil Jackson all left the team the following season and they missed the post season twice? Or the time the Spurs eliminated the 3x champions. Me neither, I guess you're right about the Lakers supposed to win it all because of Stern.

  25. #50
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Did you read any of my posts? I said that trades can't be looked at in terms of immediate winners or losers. Take the Dwight Howard trade.

    What if Howard leaves the Lakers in the off season for Dallas, Houston or his hometown (where his close friends with Josh Smith is ) Atlanta. All of a sudden that move for to trade for Howard becomes worthless because they gave up a 1st rounder and Bynum ( who is currently hurt) to get him. If he returns and plays well and becomes a star player for them going forward that looks like a bad trade for the Lakers

    The Magic got Afflalo, Nicholson & 3 1st rounders. Both have played fairly well and what happens if those picks turn in to rotation players or become trade chips for better assets. Better yet since they don't have Howard they are in the lottery where they can trade up or even acquire another lottery pick because they have the flexibility to do so.

    The Lakers already drafted Marc Gasol, in the 2007 draft with the 47th pick, so the Grizzlies knew exactly who they were acquiring. Gasol was traded in the following season.

    I'm also a Spurs fan if you're wondering, i just hate when people simplify complicated things.
    Yes, I read your posts. My mistake about Gasol. The Grizzlies were not trading talent for talent, they were looking to shed Gasol's contract so they could sell the team. That his brother developed into a good player is good for the team, the new owners and the fans, but it makes that no less of a lopsided trade. As you said, I guess we have to agree to disagree about it, but I do see what you're driving at.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •