Angel, no need to explain yourself to Brewski (the reasons are obvious).
"Even 'tho those who express their anger in a blind hatred way shall be forgiven with thy always useful ignore button, The Church of Manu is against this blind hate of both Rasho and Tony. You might think there are more chances of an Islamic-Jewish state, but sometimes religions must unite against the devil himself, who posts under the screename Ice Cold Brewski in this forum"
May Ginobili be with you.
All this Tony hatred is ridiculous.
because people focus on a basketball players weaknesses instead of the their strengths. Especially when the player has some glaring weaknesses.
With parker we have to appreciate what he brings to the table that no other point guard can bring to the spurs.
#1 Ball Control- the guy doesn't turn the ball over and is very reliable with the ball.
#2- He is the best penetrating/finishing point guard in the NBA, bar none.
#3- When he's focused he can be a very good defender.
#4- He's a decent rebounder for his size
#5- He has the rare ability to take over games and win them by himself.
#6- He's coachable
#7- He's only 23.
Negatives.
#1- Jump shot needs some work(Chip Englend)
#2- He has struggled in Close out games. (With age and more Eva Longoria's he should work through this)
You're Canadian, right?
...
Parker played decent today. And apparently helped the team a lot when he came in. (five assists in his first few minutes ?) Anyway, he has struggled in this tourney, but I don't really care. TimmyD sucked in the Olympics too. I don't really care what the Spurs players do in the summer - just don't get hurt.
By the way, I think that it will take a long time for Chip to fix Tony's shot (he's changing his whole mechanics) but when he's done, I think Spurs fans will appreciate Tony a lot more.
Took Tiger Woods a year to change his mechanics and for it to work.
We wont see the fruits of Chip's labor prob till next year.
Brewski with more "I hate Parker" posts??? NOOOOOOO I WONT HEAR OF IT!!!!
Hes played bad in a euro tournament.
Who in cares.
What does that have to do with the NBA, or the Spurs?
BTW, Walton, the canadiens arent exactly known for stellar backbone, so you critisizing them is pretty amusing.
Yeah that's it. Blame the whole thread on me as usual. I'm not the one that started it but go ahead and blame me if it lifts your skirt.
I'm just here to count the lame excuses that pop up in these threads. Those can get damn funny.
^You never miss a beat, though. That's his point.
typical of your comprehension skills I didnt blame the thread on you, just your incessant hating on Tony Parker.Blame the whole thread on me as usual
Its gotten down to outright stupidity.
Give it up already.
Yes. I just spewed so much "Parker Hate" in this thread.
Read the thread again. I'm just ammusing myself with all of the lame excuses Parker homers (like yourself) can come up with whenever he plays poorly. , I didn't even mention Parker in this thread until now.
One of us needs to work on his "comprehension skills". But it isn't me.
calling facts, excuses, yeah thats hate.just spewed so much "Parker Hate" in this thread
I didnt read the thread, but all I have to say is who cares? As long as he preforms with SA then thats all I care about.
\
"Parker is just not exerting himself" is not a fact. It's an excuse.
Assuming the writer is writing his article without having followed Euro-Bball is not a fact. It's an excuse. Did you keep reading after the article? Here's a quote for you in case you missed it:
"Simon Wilkinson writes for The Press Association in Europe."
Hmmm. I'm no expert but it sounds to me like this European writer does follow Euro Basketball. Or maybe he just ignores it and writes about it anyway.
Trying to make it sound like Parker has ty numbers because it's "Euro-Basketball" is not a fact. It's an excuse. Parker was drafted from a French team that played "Euro Basketball" so it's not like the concept is new to him.
I'm still waiting for the guy that said, "Tony just misses Eva" in the 'growing up the hardway' thread. That one was classic.
Last edited by IceColdBrewski; 09-22-2005 at 10:22 PM.
man.
Your manhate for Parker is sickening.
but of course your still mr
Udrih > Parker
so we should expect this.
Manhate? I don't think you could sound any gayer if you tried.
Nice dodge by the way. And once again, I never said Udrih was better than Parker. I said I'd take Udrih over Parker. (personal preference). Big difference.
T Park, no need to get on the Canadians, what did we ever do to you. Though, I can't condone Walton.
Ay... Canada Blows
Ay......
Damn. Brewski makes T Park look good.
wgaf.
typical bandwagoners.
Euro championships are stupid.
Am I a homer? Wow, never noticed it...
I am fair an balanced. Like Fox News.
i watched the last part of the game...
parker impressed, not for his scoring but for the stability he gave the team...
Simon Wilkinson is at best an English fellow, who made his career looking at London Towers. I do not want to bash him, but the guy made a lousy homework. I would not even want to comment, if this was an article from an American in Belgrade. Then I would be just pissed off.\
Assuming the writer is writing his article without having followed Euro-Bball is not a fact. It's an excuse. Did you keep reading after the article? Here's a quote for you in case you missed it:
"Simon Wilkinson writes for The Press Association in Europe."
Hmmm. I'm no expert but it sounds to me like this European writer does follow Euro Basketball. Or maybe he just ignores it and writes about it anyway.
Trying to make it sound like Parker has ty numbers because it's "Euro-Basketball" is not a fact. It's an excuse. Parker was drafted from a French team that played "Euro Basketball" so it's not like the concept is new to him.
Morever, I did not just claim that he did not follow Eurobasket, I gave proof on my statement. Guy judged performances strictly on NBA performance statistics. Why that is not a good measurment, i explained in the section on apples and oranges.
Excuse would be, that Parker was important to the team even he did not make his shots. But none would say that. Guy sucked and gradually got to his NBA standard. We just say writer sucks big time. Proofs I won't present for the second time. The best proof however is recent:
Kirilenko being destroyed by a team with at best b performance by Papalouskas (who was an F player till that game)
honorable mention: France over Lithuania; France over SCG; Izrael over Spain
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
