Spurs my be on the verge of decimating the OKC Dynasty............. Thoughs?

[lmbebo]

Premature ... by a long shot. 1 game. Amazing game by us and a bad game by them. Highly doubt it repeats itself 3 more times... They are too good of a team to have that happen.

Fully expect this to be a much tougher game tonight. They are going to come out with a lot more energy.

[Chinook]

The Spurs didn't kill The Thunder. The Thunder did.

[TheDoctor]

The Spurs didn't kill The Thunder. The Thunder did.

#SuicideJob

[Cowboys_Wear_Spurs]

The Spurs didn't kill The Thunder. The Thunder did.

Spurs definitely stole their Thunder sat. night.

[boutons_deux]

Seattle/OKC has been a pretty tough team since the early 2000s (Ray Allen team), not a dynasty, but just a "good run"

[Brazil]

1. They are not a dynasty
2. We won game 1

[Proxy]

potentially, it'd be another franchise that never lived up to it's hype due to running into SA. I guess the equivalent is Nash's Suns? Dynasty though... Lakers, Pistons, Heat got rings brah

[K...]

Sigh, we had like two or three shots to kill those prime mavs. Instead it was Dwayne, and Jack.

[Budkin]

We are so losing Game 2.

Would be typical Spurs.

[keeferob25]

Since this thread is mostly a fail...I want to bring up a point I heard in the nba forum. While it's cool we beat the Lakers and heat, two of the best historical teams of the era we only won after each had been to multiple finals trips and it could be argued that the spurs only beat those legendary dynasties because they were tired and ripe for ending.

Now obviously the spurs have been on the reverse end of being too tired to defend. And the spurs can only play the teams they are assigned Rio play. But is this a legit point or just your usual Lakers fan insecurity.

I cannot stress how overrated to high that early 2000's Laker's Dynasty is. Its easier to buy into the idea that Portland choked in game 7 2000 but rewatch that game and its once again a load of favorable calls to LA. Duncan missed the entire postseason...just think if we didn't have to face Curry and won this year how fraudulent many would view our chip. But nobody bats an eye for LA. In 2001 they were absolutely legit. 2002 is criminally accepted and counted as a three-peat crowning among the public, even fans here. I never did. They were NOT the best team that year. SAC wasn't the most mentally tough team, but they showed enough to be better than LA that year and were robbed. Even the BIGGEST LA media homers admitted it. Whoever actually considers that ring legit didn't watch a second of that series. They were roasted in 2003 by SAS, and Lakers RETOOLED and still got obliterated the next season by Detroit.

So basically in 5 seasons they:

- Avoided the league's best player (who swept them the year before and won the chip) and received gift officiating in an elimination game 7 (2000)
- Won a legit ring in dominating fashion (2001)
- Were outplayed and LOST but the league LITERALLY gave them the ring through the most BLATANTLY CROOKED officiating in league history (2002)
- Got demolished 2 years straight (2003/2004) even after having a chance to retool in 2004.

I'm sorry but I just NEVER bought into that overrated and over-hyped mystique the media built about the Lakers. They were literally protected systematically from the top down and still lost 3 out of those 5 years (2002, 2003, 2004) while fielding supposedly the most unguardable offensive force ever and another top 5 player back then with the "GOAT" coach. That's utter underachievement if I ever saw any. Total bull and that "dynasty" narrative has stuck successfully all these years. The power of the media I guess.

[RD2191]

5 rings, gots. everything else.

[RD2191]

I cannot stress how overrated to high that early 2000's Laker's Dynasty is. Its easier to buy into the idea that Portland choked in game 7 2000 but rewatch that game and its once again a load of favorable calls to LA. Duncan missed the entire postseason...just think if we didn't have to face Curry and won this year how fraudulent many would view our chip. But nobody bats an eye for LA. In 2001 they were absolutely legit. 2002 is criminally accepted and counted as a three-peat crowning among the public, even fans here. I never did. They were NOT the best team that year. SAC wasn't the most mentally tough team, but they showed enough to be better than LA that year and were robbed. Even the BIGGEST LA media homers admitted it. Whoever actually considers that ring legit didn't watch a second of that series. They were roasted in 2003 by SAS, and Lakers RETOOLED and still got obliterated the next season by Detroit.

So basically in 5 seasons they:

- Avoided the league's best player (who swept them the year before and won the chip) and received gift officiating in an elimination game 7 (2000)
- Won a legit ring in dominating fashion (2001)
- Were outplayed and LOST but the league LITERALLY gave them the ring through the most BLATANTLY CROOKED officiating in league history (2002)
- Got demolished 2 years straight (2003/2004) even after having a chance to retool in 2004.

I'm sorry but I just NEVER bought into that overrated and over-hyped mystique the media built about the Lakers. They were literally protected systematically from the top down and still lost 3 out of those 5 years (2002, 2003, 2004) while fielding supposedly the most unguardable offensive force ever and another top 5 player back then with the "GOAT" coach. That's utter underachievement if I ever saw any. Total bull and that "dynasty" narrative has stuck successfully all these years. The power of the media I guess.

Bold this man.

[.G.]

[Gervin44Silas13]

I cannot stress how overrated to high that early 2000's Laker's Dynasty is. Its easier to buy into the idea that Portland choked in game 7 2000 but rewatch that game and its once again a load of favorable calls to LA. Duncan missed the entire postseason...just think if we didn't have to face Curry and won this year how fraudulent many would view our chip. But nobody bats an eye for LA. In 2001 they were absolutely legit. 2002 is criminally accepted and counted as a three-peat crowning among the public, even fans here. I never did. They were NOT the best team that year. SAC wasn't the most mentally tough team, but they showed enough to be better than LA that year and were robbed. Even the BIGGEST LA media homers admitted it. Whoever actually considers that ring legit didn't watch a second of that series. They were roasted in 2003 by SAS, and Lakers RETOOLED and still got obliterated the next season by Detroit.

So basically in 5 seasons they:

- Avoided the league's best player (who swept them the year before and won the chip) and received gift officiating in an elimination game 7 (2000)
- Won a legit ring in dominating fashion (2001)
- Were outplayed and LOST but the league LITERALLY gave them the ring through the most BLATANTLY CROOKED officiating in league history (2002)
- Got demolished 2 years straight (2003/2004) even after having a chance to retool in 2004.

I'm sorry but I just NEVER bought into that overrated and over-hyped mystique the media built about the Lakers. They were literally protected systematically from the top down and still lost 3 out of those 5 years (2002, 2003, 2004) while fielding supposedly the most unguardable offensive force ever and another top 5 player back then with the "GOAT" coach. That's utter underachievement if I ever saw any. Total bull and that "dynasty" narrative has stuck successfully all these years. The power of the media I guess.

All thanks to David Stern

[Spurs 4 The Win]

This could be the last hurrah for OKC if the Spurs win this series you can count that Chuckbrook and Durant have seen their last days as Okies one of the two or both.
These two guys clearly have ego problems they are in the press confrences at the same time. Because they are attention s. its evident.....behind closed doors

Westbrook is the Western Conf. Carmelo Great Talent but uncoachable

Durant never acknowleges anything to the opposition even when he gets schooled by Kawhi....dude is not humble and alreday has a beef with the OKC media...when Chuckbrook gets all the love.

I love what our team decimated these Dynasties

2000 Shaq/Kobe Lakers

2005 Pistions

2014 Lebrons Heat

2016 Durant/Westbrook Thunder?

Not a dynasty and where are the Suns?

[Raven]

lol people thinking it was just one game

[Slomo]

OKC is a dynasty?

[Horse]

Only one game and I doubt we shoot that well again or they shoot that bad. But this all seemed sustainable maybe just a closer margin. And it could avalanche real quick with some beliving durant is already gone.

[baseline bum]

We are so losing Game 2.

no , this ing forum is so bipolar

[Sean Cagney]

Sigh, we had like two or three shots to kill those prime mavs. Instead it was Dwayne, and Jack.

We did eliminate that 2010 team that had high hopes and was the 2nd seed though.... That was great.

[Spur|n|Austin]

Not dynasties but yes a win against the Thunder this series would most likely equal KD moving on.

[SpursFan86]

This topic...

[T Park]

it was only one game ...

You guys that keep talking like this still probably think OKC has "depth"

[Gervin44Silas13]

Not a dynasty and where are the Suns?

I forgot to mention them...Thanks Spurs 4 win ....It seems you cant think openly on this fourm cause when you do everyones vagina gets hurt

[Fireball]

You guys that keep talking like this still probably think OKC has "depth"

They are still talented enough to beat the Spurs and I will not exhale before we won 4 games ... 2013 Finals we blew out the Heat one game only to lose the next one ... one game means nothing