Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59
  1. #26
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    A le favorite just eeking into the playoffs on the refs back is enormously disappointing, I don't know how you can argue this. It's like you're looking at this with hindsight instead of in the moment, just like when you try to argue with me that the 2004 Finals wasn't a monumental upset.
    Not arguing its not a disappointment ...
    Im telling you where I rank them. 2004 had a legit le shot.
    2013 never wore legit contenders ... at least to ME.
    and i called that early on.
    Im not arguing that the 2013 was not overhyped so not sure what you are even disputing ...
    Im actually proud of the fact that i was one of the few that saw the 2013 as fraudulent. All you are doing is showing me how unbiased I can be ...vegas, laker fan laker haters all thought we would win.
    As for 2004 didnt say it wasnt a big upset again based on hype it was ...but i also was rightfully scared of the Pistons ...and when everyone was calling sweep or Lakers in 5 ...i was arguing we were in trouble ...
    So of course you think the way you do ...because you did not see what i did.
    Last edited by Killakobe81; 08-02-2016 at 01:58 PM.

  2. #27
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    With the obvious ref-rape no way should the kings be on this list. I would also have 2004 near the top.
    This.

  3. #28
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    With the obvious ref-rape no way should the kings be on this list. I would also have 2004 near the top.
    Only pussies & assholes blame the officiating.

  4. #29
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    A le favorite just eeking into the playoffs on the refs back is enormously disappointing, I don't know how you can argue this. It's like you're looking at this with hindsight instead of in the moment, just like when you try to argue with me that the 2004 Finals wasn't a monumental upset.
    Only pussies & assholes blame the officiating.

  5. #30
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    Only pussies & assholes blame the officiating.
    Fine. A le favorite just eeking into the playoffs is enormously disappointing.

  6. #31
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    That Barkley Pippen dream Clyde rockets have to be there somewhere.

  7. #32
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    That Barkley Pippen dream Clyde rockets have to be there somewhere.
    thought the same ...

  8. #33
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Post Count
    8,349
    That Barkley Pippen dream Clyde rockets have to be there somewhere.
    That team never existed. It was Clyde, Barkley, Olajuwon in '97 and maybe '98 and then after Clyde left Pippen joined Barkley and Olajuwon in '99 in the lockout season. And I would hardly call them a super-team considering all of them were past their primes. Barkley was 35-36, Olajuwon was 36 and Pippen was 33-34 and just coming off back surgery after the '98 Finals. They were the all-geriatric team lol.

  9. #34
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    That team never existed. It was Clyde, Barkley, Olajuwon in '97 and maybe '98 and then after Clyde left Pippen joined Barkley and Olajuwon in '99 in the lockout season. And I would hardly call them a super-team considering all of them were past their primes. Barkley was 35-36, Olajuwon was 36 and Pippen was 33-34 and just coming off back surgery after the '98 Finals. They were the all-geriatric team lol.
    That backcourt was too in 99, I think they were starting a rookie Michael erson and a rookie Cuttino Mobley. Both were talented and became good players but hard to call that a superteam when it was starting two rookies. That was such a terrible situation for Pippen since Barkley and Olajuwon would just take 10 seconds backing their man down every single possession and half of Pippens shots would be desperation threes at the shot clock buzzer off passes from Barkley and Olajuwon. And of course Rocket fan blamed Scottie instead of their two black holes on the block. The 99 Rockets had maybe the ugliest offense I have seen since Fratello's Cavs.

  10. #35
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    That team never existed. It was Clyde, Barkley, Olajuwon in '97 and maybe '98 and then after Clyde left Pippen joined Barkley and Olajuwon in '99 in the lockout season. And I would hardly call them a super-team considering all of them were past their primes. Barkley was 35-36, Olajuwon was 36 and Pippen was 33-34 and just coming off back surgery after the '98 Finals. They were the all-geriatric team lol.
    So past their prime players disqualify you mean like malone and GP in 2004
    Or nash in 2013?
    They (rox) were a superteam on paper as well ...

  11. #36
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    So past their prime players disqualify you mean like malone and GP in 2004
    Or nash in 2013?
    They (rox) were a superteam on paper as well ...
    Shaq and Kobe were prime in 2004, Kobe and Howard were hyped as prime in 2013.

  12. #37
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Post Count
    8,349
    So past their prime players disqualify you mean like malone and GP in 2004
    Or nash in 2013?
    They (rox) were a superteam on paper as well ...
    Yeah, I think age disqualifies any team that has over the hill stars that can't do what they once did on a consistent basis. It's like calling the 2012 Celtics a superteam because they still had Pierce, Ray Allen and KG. They were a superteam in '08 but in '12 those ers were OLD and couldn't perform consistently like they did in their late 20's, early 30's.

  13. #38
    36/7/7
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    5,892
    04 Lakers win the le against any other East champion from 1999-2007.

  14. #39
    Wrecks and Effects RsxPiimp's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    8,329
    That one time Knicks had Ewing, LJ, Allan Houston and Sprewell...

  15. #40
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    38,236
    That backcourt was too in 99, I think they were starting a rookie Michael erson and a rookie Cuttino Mobley. Both were talented and became good players but hard to call that a superteam when it was starting two rookies. That was such a terrible situation for Pippen since Barkley and Olajuwon would just take 10 seconds backing their man down every single possession and half of Pippens shots would be desperation threes at the shot clock buzzer off passes from Barkley and Olajuwon. And of course Rocket fan blamed Scottie instead of their two black holes on the block. The 99 Rockets had maybe the ugliest offense I have seen since Fratello's Cavs.
    Pippen was a cancer everywhere he played without Jordan. That can't be argued.

  16. #41
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    That team never existed. It was Clyde, Barkley, Olajuwon in '97 and maybe '98 and then after Clyde left Pippen joined Barkley and Olajuwon in '99 in the lockout season. And I would hardly call them a super-team considering all of them were past their primes. Barkley was 35-36, Olajuwon was 36 and Pippen was 33-34 and just coming off back surgery after the '98 Finals. They were the all-geriatric team lol.
    The that's two disappointing super teams then.

    No way can I not call an Olajuwon Barkley Clyde/Pippen team a superteam. And those were disappointing teams too.

    Nash was geriatric when he joined the lakers, so was Kobe. Same as Malone and Payton.

  17. #42
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    That backcourt was too in 99, I think they were starting a rookie Michael erson and a rookie Cuttino Mobley. Both were talented and became good players but hard to call that a superteam when it was starting two rookies. That was such a terrible situation for Pippen since Barkley and Olajuwon would just take 10 seconds backing their man down every single possession and half of Pippens shots would be desperation threes at the shot clock buzzer off passes from Barkley and Olajuwon. And of course Rocket fan blamed Scottie instead of their two black holes on the block. The 99 Rockets had maybe the ugliest offense I have seen since Fratello's Cavs.
    That's about not utilizing strengths and integrating the right talents.

    We all know Barkley can't do anything but pound the ball on offense. He did it his entire basketball career. And it alos shows how good Olajuwon is when he isn't Surrounded by three point shooters.

  18. #43
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    Pippen was a cancer everywhere he played without Jordan. That can't be argued.
    He played well with the Blazers.

  19. #44
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    Pippen was a cancer everywhere he played without Jordan. That can't be argued.
    Why is Rocket fan so bitter at Pippen? Rudy T just stuck him at the three point line to be a spot up shooter and bail out Barkley and Olajuwon. Why would you use a ballhandler like Pippen in a role that mismatched to his skillset? He's Scottie Pippen, one of the great point forwards of all-time, he's not ing Danny Green. That wouldn't have worked even when Barkley and Olajuwon were still devastating options down low, much less when both were so washed up by 1999. That was a painful team to watch and Rudy coached it like he still had 95 Olajuwon and 93 Barkley and as if Pippen was Bruce Bowen. And fatass Barkley who never won calling out Pippen as uncommitted on NBC.

  20. #45
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    That's about not utilizing strengths and integrating the right talents.

    We all know Barkley can't do anything but pound the ball on offense. He did it his entire basketball career. And it alos shows how good Olajuwon is when he isn't Surrounded by three point shooters.
    True, but Barkley didn't back it down 10-15 seconds every possession like he did on that 99 Rockets team once he was so far past his prime. That Rockets team had to be the inspiration for the five second backdown rule. That team made the 99 Spurs look like 7 seconds or less.

  21. #46
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    Shaq and Kobe were prime in 2004, Kobe and Howard were hyped as prime in 2013.
    How the was Kobe prime in 2013?

  22. #47
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,594
    The that's two disappointing super teams then.

    No way can I not call an Olajuwon Barkley Clyde/Pippen team a superteam. And those were disappointing teams too.

    Nash was geriatric when he joined the lakers, so was Kobe. Same as Malone and Payton.
    Wow we agree. 2004 definitely more disapointing because Kobe was nearing his prime and Shaq was just past his
    ..

  23. #48
    stats geek snickles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    397
    wow....the standards for being a super team sure have fallen.......

  24. #49
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    True, but Barkley didn't back it down 10-15 seconds every possession like he did on that 99 Rockets team once he was so far past his prime. That Rockets team had to be the inspiration for the five second backdown rule. That team made the 99 Spurs look like 7 seconds or less.
    No doubt. Barkley got results when he was in his prime and didn't get it done when he was past his prime but didn't realize it.

    He still pounded the ball like crazy when he was inphilly and Phoenix.

  25. #50
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,142
    Wow we agree. 2004 definitely more disapointing because Kobe was nearing his prime and Shaq was just past his
    ..
    They are all disappointing though.

    As for primes. Shaq was still there. Not 2001 prime but he was still top 2 or 3 player that year. Kobes prime is hard to define. He's the best 05 to 07 but the best version and most productive version of Kobe was 2002.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •