Emoticons = the classic "smilies" like![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
etc
Emojis = the non-"smilie" small clip-art pics like![]()
![]()
![]()
etc
He posts like a , so they might as well be emojis
Emoticons = the classic "smilies" like![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
etc
Emojis = the non-"smilie" small clip-art pics like![]()
![]()
![]()
etc
now you're reduced to
he posts like a
What's next, are you going to call me a poopy face?
They will win the division. That's about the only guarantee.
Your team is the only other team in the division with even one win, and they beat the ty 5-field goal Loins todayalso you guys have Demarco Murray on your team so you have no chance...
Like I gave OKC the kiss of death when I had OKC beating the Spurs in 6 in the second round, eh?
gui ude27
dumbjohn2008
premature ejaculating because the Texans beat the Chiefs by 7
calling weiler's bad decisions easily fixable
not crossing midfield until the 3rd quarter
Texans
FWIW, I still picked the Patriots. I just thought the Texans SHOULD have won. But given O'Brien vs Belichick, the outcome was nary a surprise.
21 teams would have beaten this Pats squad... fortunately for the Pats, the Texans and Bills are in the 10 that are too incompetent offensively and coaching wise.
you for making this thread you ing sucker. Go play your guitar and get sprayed by semen you ing got.
So in less than a week you went from saying the Texans have the inside track to winning the AFC to saying they're one of the 10 teams that can't beat a 3rd string QB.
yeah, not a flip flop at all.
Yeah nuts, this post really looks like you were picking the Patriots to win.
You're not fooling anyone.
Thread was an overreaction to Garoppolo going down I admit, but the point still stands: HOU laid a ing egg when they had a golden chance to get a leg up on the AFC. Now they're cooked for the most part. Oh well.
repost from http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=263161
AFC East Team
W L T Pct PF PA Net Pts TD Home Road Div Pct Conf Pct Non-Conf Streak Last 5 (1) New England Patriots 13 3 0 .813 XX XX XX XX 8-0 5-3 5-1 .833 10-2 .833 3-1 New York Jets 9 7 0 .563 XX XX XX XX 6-2 3-5 4-2 .667 8-4 .667 1-3 Miami Dolphins 6 10 0 .375 XX XX XX XX 6-2 0-8 2-4 .333 5-7 .417 1-3 Buffalo Bills 2 14 0 .125 XX XX XX XX 2-6 0-8 1-5 .167 2-10 .167 0-4
^ I stick by those, only thing is I probably overshot MIA, damn straight about BUF despite my naysayers![]()
TBH, Brissett wasn't anything special and Houston's defense wasn't bad given the cir stances. When your punt/kick returner loses multiple fumbles inside his own 20, meanwhile the other punter is kicking 60 yard punts and the offense isn't doing anything, setting your defense up near midfield or worse every time, it's extremely hard... the Texans got some good red zone stops and everything, enough to win for sure if their offense did anything besides suck.
LISTEN TO JIM NANTZ RIGHT NOW. HE'S REPEATING EXACTLY WHAT I'M SAYING ABOUT THIS GAME. HOUSTON HAD A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY AND DONE ED UP![]()
This was before your post about how the patriots 3rd stringer won't cut it against the dominant Texans.
I didn't officially change it and I posted in another thread that I would consider it but likely not do it, citing Belichick and the HFA. I didn't. That's good enough.
Although I had NE losing at AZ... so that 3-1 non conference is probably wrong, unless you think they'll lose at San Francisco (i don't).
Where is this post? I'll believe it when I see it.
either way, this thread was re ed.
My loss is: I had NE losing at AZ... so that 3-1 non conference is probably wrong, unless you think they'll lose at San Francisco (i don't).
I think this team will easily get the bye... and yes, this thread was an overreaction and a mind fart disregarding Belichick's greatness and Assweiler's suckness
I'm 23–10, tied with Avante... i'm not trying to be perfect. I own up when I lose.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)