Could Blacks have changed the vote?

[Will Hunting]

Probably would have been more effective for Sanders to back Hillary as the lesser of two evils. Would have made more sense to his backers than the cuckfest he put on.

I'm not sure since it seems like the big difference this time around was that the "lesser of two evils" argument didn't work for the Dems, even though theoretically it should have been able to work against the most controversial presidential candidate in the last 75 years (granted, Trump could have actually been videotaped grabbing some random woman's pussy, and he still wouldn't have been as easy to hate as Romney was ).

Trump did run a good campaign and he knew exactly what states to target, but the statistic no one is talking about is that he had LESS overall votes than Romney did in 2012. The big reason he won is because there was a big chunk of Democrats that simply didn't vote.

[Will Hunting]

Wisconsin for example is a demonstration of how arrogant Clinton is....Trump had only 2,000 votes more than Romney yet he won the state because Clinton had 250k votes less than Obama.

After Hillary got almost as many delegates as Sanders did during the primary in Wisconsin even though he won the state 56% to 43%, and this happened solely because the super-delegates in the state were 9:1 in favor of her when they're supposed to be representing the people, any normal person would expect a good number of people to feel disenfranchised and uneasy about voting for the very person who's political machine quashed their primary vote, but not Hilary. She didn't even ing visit the state once after the primary, she was simply so sure that the Wisconsin voters who were obviously snubbed by a rigged political process during the primary would fall in line and vote for her.

That right there is why people find Hillary so unlikable. She has the at ude that she shouldn't have to talk to or relate to people, that they should just know how amazing she is.

[rmt]

Wisconsin for example is a demonstration of how arrogant Clinton is....Trump had only 2,000 votes more than Romney yet he won the state because Clinton had 250k votes less than Obama.

After Hillary got almost as many delegates as Sanders did during the primary in Wisconsin even though he won the state 56% to 43%, and this happened solely because the super-delegates in the state were 9:1 in favor of her when they're supposed to be representing the people, any normal person would expect a good number of people to feel disenfranchised and uneasy about voting for the very person who's political machine quashed their primary vote, but not Hilary. She didn't even ing visit the state once after the primary, she was simply so sure that the Wisconsin voters who were obviously snubbed by a rigged political process during the primary would fall in line and vote for her.

That right there is why people find Hillary so unlikable. She has the at ude that she shouldn't have to talk to or relate to people, that they should just know how amazing she is.

Well, this ties into what you said above about Obama and others falling in line with the Clintons. Her mistake was thinking that the voters (in those rust belt states) would too.

[rmt]

Shouldn't you all be out pushing to get rid of super delegates for next election?