False. I've talked to a professor that has said the exact same thing in the past. It was a directive to discriminate against white men.
If Trumpistas aren't triggered regularly enough, they look around for a way to trigger themselves.
False. I've talked to a professor that has said the exact same thing in the past. It was a directive to discriminate against white men.
Sample of two. Must be an epidemic among liberals.
It really doesn't take much critical thought to figure out what the recipe of white guilt, white privilege, male privilege, cis gender privilege, virtue signaling, and drives for equality of outcome are going to lead to. It leads to discrimination. I don't need idiot professors to tell me that they were directed to discriminate.
sounds like the oligarchy's SCOTUS5 position when they gutted the Voting Rights Act, Kennedy's majority opinion lying that America had come a long way (so voter suppression of blacks was no longer a problem)
Everything you post makes you out to be the victim tbh.
a - san antonio is 73% white (23% non-hispanic). that still exceeds national figures for blacks or latinos, and i never said white privilege exists in nigeria
b - im saying it happens. ive seen it happen both at school and in the workplace. and this in liberal LA
c - what does double negative have to do with the veracity of the statement? apparently nothing because you admitted that you'd do the exact thing i was talking about... thats something a guy with a typical "white" name would never have to deal with
d - people do ask questions sure. but how often, specifically, has your immigration status been called into question, chris?
e - i didnt call cops racist, chris
f - i didnt call judges racist, chris
you keep confusing "white privilege" with "white people are racist"
It's actually a complete stretch to suggest discussions of privilege are meant to lead to imbalance towards whites. Kind of like talking about gun control doesn't mean you want to ban guns. I don't know why it's so hard for you guys to debate anything less than the most extreme scenario.
person 1: white privilege is a thing
person 2: STOP CALLING ME RACIST
Something I always wondered: do us armos have white privilege?
No, it's often used to shutdown the opinion of white people. If you use a useless term to shutup people that disagree with you it's not difficult expect a general trend toward discrimination in other areas. The net result of white guilt is also discrimination. The net result of shooting for equality of outcome is also discrimination.
That's exactly what many people want. Furthermore, the terrible logic that leads one to suggesting what they do on this forum can also be applied to other guns. So it's not a leap, it's the logical next step.
person 2: Black privilege is a thing. American privilege is a thing. Attractive privilege is a thing. Wealth privilege is a thing. Health privilege is a thing. Tall privilege is a thing. Female privilege is a thing. So why are you talking about one useless umbrella term when one could not possibly act on it? Oh, because you want to make white people feel guilty. Get specific or shut up.
in person, i'd say so, unless you have a strong accent.
Have you been a victim of black privilege?
please... do describes the forms of discrimination you face due to your height, wealth, health, and penis
Sorry homie, but that's pretty ridiculous and tone deaf to history.
Please provide a real-world example of how white opinions have been shut down, to illustrate what you mean by shutdown. Has some binding action been taken or are you just talking about being called out on the internet?
Examples of this?The net result of white guilt is also discrimination. The net result of shooting for equality of outcome is also discrimination.
As illustrated by what real world examples?That's exactly what many people want. Furthermore, the terrible logic that leads one to suggesting what they do on this forum can also be applied to other guns. So it's not a leap, it's the logical next step.
1) start your conversation with a blanket statement
2) explain that blanket terms/statements don't start conversations
3) profit
i feel sorry for those that have "white guilt"... to me, all this bs is just exposing the pussies in the white demographic that go along with this bs "white privilege"/"white guilt".
boutons is a great example of one of these losers but on the opposite end where he points fingers at other whites as if he is anything but white himself. i believe "white guilt" is pussy to begin with but boutons level is dangerous.
The racist right doesnt like being called racist so they think they can in that label on the left
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)