I shared the video I thought some might enjoy. I didn't offer a dissertation on it. Don't watch it if you need Cliff Notes.
Didn’t watch the videos, but Sam Harris had Zeihan as well as Ian Brenner on his podcast a week or so ago. Brenner took a much less fatalistic view than Zeihan or at least assumed a longer time horizon.
The somewhat rosier outlook for the US, as compared to China, form Zeihan was largely predicated on being able to leverage the the labor from Mexico and South America to mitigate the waning American population , much of which presumably would require a more lax immigration policy.
I shared the video I thought some might enjoy. I didn't offer a dissertation on it. Don't watch it if you need Cliff Notes.
fine by me if you have nothing more to say about your own OP
![]()
In what ways do you think Zeihan is comparable to Ehrlich?
Be specific
seems Kirkus based the comparison on catastrophism, it was their comparison, not mine. does it strike you as off base?
This message is hidden because ElNono is on your ignore list.
^^^ lol beep boop reads every one of them
I'll take your non-denial denial as a no, unless you have something to add to the topic.
I think the average listener would take his statistics for granted. The legwork required to debunk his stats that he uses to support his thesis would be a hindrance to doing so, and so many probably just accept his claims at face value. However, there has to be a small handful of people who are out to disprove him. I haven't looked for those yet, but I am sure they are out there. His presentation style is easy to hear and accept because we're in the country with the best outlook, according to him. Plus he has a very polished presentation style that's not annoying like some.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)