Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 51
  1. #26
    Veteran bigfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,910
    P.U., they stunk, plain and simple.

  2. #27
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    The disastrous second round drafting of the last two years may be coming home to roost, even if on a small stage.

    All the more perplexing because the Spurs had four second round picks, two of which were premiere top five in the second round.
    If you care about second rounders as roster assets, you’re doing it wrong. Examine those two seasons, and take that to the bank as the pattern going forward. They’ll sell/trade the first one, and the second will most likely be a two way. We have almost too many FIRST rounders to roster. Second rounders would really have virtually no chance.

  3. #28
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    Exactly exstatic.

    The primary utility of 2nd rounders is to facilitate trades (like the Graham salary dump, or as a contribution to the Harrison Barnes pickup) or to fill out the 2-ways. But to actually grab rosterable players? Pretty unusual. Dejuan Blair and Tre Jones are good examples of players that were drafted and immediately joined the main club and contributed. But their experiences are very atypical.

  4. #29
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Couldn't they have drafted Furphy, let him play in the summer league and showcase him to other teams, then trade him (or is this not allowed?). If Indiana gave him that big of a contract, I wonder if they would have given more had they seen him play well in the SL for the Spurs.

  5. #30
    Believe. onechance87's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    2,704
    Couldn't they have drafted Furphy, let him play in the summer league and showcase him to other teams, then trade him (or is this not allowed?). If Indiana gave him that big of a contract, I wonder if they would have given more had they seen him play well in the SL for the Spurs.
    it seems we are getting second rounders just to sale them.We are just cheap and dont want to develop players anymore.Indiana got
    the pick from us cause they are willing to pay and try to develop furphy.Guess will see how that goes in a couple of years.

  6. #31
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    For a team that has sucked as much as the Spurs have for almost the entire decade, one would think their summer league team would be way better than it is. At what point should we worry about PATFO's inability to detect talent and, at the very least, not have the absolute worse summer league roster in the entire NBA by a huge distance? I remember some years ago when we had intersting prospects playing in these tournaments. Now even draft picks are completely underwhelming. Recent 2nd round picks have been atrocious, they need to get their head out of their asses and start doing a better job at selecting 2nd round talent, tbh.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,665
    Exstatic is right about our roster crunch. We got Wemby on essentially our first deliberate Tank season, which was really lucky, but the FO was not planning based on that stroke of luck. So they have ac ulated many extra FRP's in the next three or so seasons. These get guaranteed contracts and roster spots. Unless we spend some on a major trade (eg Markkannen), we are pretty much full up on rookies for the immediate future. Thus, second round picks are a) trade bait or b) Draft and Stash, or c) close to unusable...

    Which is why the Furphy thing doesn't bother me a bit. They definitely didn't want to give him a roster spot and ~$3 million of our cap space. I'm pretty sure Nunez was our target anyways, as he (I suspect) had already agreed to a draft and stash strategy. Trading down to get an extra $1 million out of Indy was just good business. The other thing we should be exploring is any kind of a deal to push seconds into future assets; 5 or 6 SRP's in the next few drafts in return for their 2031 FRP would be a great deal for us, and would give them some picks to fill bench slots on the cheap...

  8. #33
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Furphy was literally picked by them and was a good fit for this roster but of course they cheaped out
    like dillingham, its probably the case that they picked Furphy specifically for Indiana. not necessarily the case that they were going to take Furphy for themselves and only then agreed to move him to Indy

  9. #34
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Exstatic is right about our roster crunch. We got Wemby on essentially our first deliberate Tank season, which was really lucky, but the FO was not planning based on that stroke of luck. So they have ac ulated many extra FRP's in the next three or so seasons. These get guaranteed contracts and roster spots. Unless we spend some on a major trade (eg Markkannen), we are pretty much full up on rookies for the immediate future. Thus, second round picks are a) trade bait or b) Draft and Stash, or c) close to unusable...

    Which is why the Furphy thing doesn't bother me a bit. They definitely didn't want to give him a roster spot and ~$3 million of our cap space. I'm pretty sure Nunez was our target anyways, as he (I suspect) had already agreed to a draft and stash strategy. Trading down to get an extra $1 million out of Indy was just good business. The other thing we should be exploring is any kind of a deal to push seconds into future assets; 5 or 6 SRP's in the next few drafts in return for their 2031 FRP would be a great deal for us, and would give them some picks to fill bench slots on the cheap...
    this is why taking Cissoko was poor planning. aside from the whole "he cant shoot" thing... they took a player at the beck end of the second round who wasnt eligible for a two-way deal. i mean sure we can waive him if we wanted to but his money for this year is guaranteed

  10. #35
    Since 1979 Das Texan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Post Count
    5,340
    Once I saw that Castle wasnt playing I quickly made the decision this game wasnt for me.

    Seems like a top notch decision was made. This team is awful and only Castle makes this even remotely palatable to watch.

  11. #36
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    On one hand, I think a lot of the criticism is valid because the choices for this roster are pretty bad. Going with seven short guards and no tall centers is weird. Too many players who have no hope of even sniffing the NBA.

    On the other hand, the Spurs were out arguably their five best summer league prospects: Castle, Cissoko, Duke, Gray and Minix. You take the top five players off any summer league team and it gets gross fast.

  12. #37
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    it seems we are getting second rounders just to sale them.We are just cheap and dont want to develop players anymore.Indiana got
    the pick from us cause they are willing to pay and try to develop furphy.Guess will see how that goes in a couple of years.
    Would you rather draft and cut them? Because, I assure you, that’s what would happen if we selected all of the SRPs. We likely can’t even roster all of the first rounders we have in the chute.

    . You people are like the kid you take to the pet store for a puppy, and they want ALL of the puppies.

  13. #38
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,565
    If you care about second rounders as roster assets, you’re doing it wrong. Examine those two seasons, and take that to the bank as the pattern going forward. They’ll sell/trade the first one, and the second will most likely be a two way. We have almost too many FIRST rounders to roster. Second rounders would really have virtually no chance.
    Even accepting your argument, the Spurs haven't done very well with their later second round picks.

    Last year they could have had GG Jackson at #44. Memphis took him at #45 as a two way as you suggest (although admittedly he didn't last as a two way, he ended up 2nd Team NBA All Rookie).

    In other words, just because you resign yourself to two ways later in the second round doesn't mean you have to choose bad ones, like the Spurs have.

  14. #39
    Believe. onechance87's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    2,704
    Would you rather draft and cut them? Because, I assure you, that’s what would happen if we selected all of the SRPs. We likely can’t even roster all of the first rounders we have in the chute.

    . You people are like the kid you take to the pet store for a puppy, and they want ALL of the puppies.
    why would i draft a player just to cut them.If they are flat out bad and dont have potential and not improving,Yeah cut their ass obviously.
    But if they are decent and keep em like we did with tre jones.Its not that complicated my guy.

  15. #40
    Veteran TrainOfThought5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    2,728
    it seems we are getting second rounders just to sale them.We are just cheap and dont want to develop players anymore.Indiana got
    the pick from us cause they are willing to pay and try to develop furphy.Guess will see how that goes in a couple of years.
    It’s like these guys have never seen money all before. We’re the Oakland A’s.

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    2,007
    This franchise roster construction has been bad for years now. And it isn’t getting any better. Furphy was the perfect second round type pick. He had an elite skill in shooting and was 6’8”. But we wanted the 6’5” wing who can’t shoot.

    It’s time for Pop to retire and for a change at GM.

  17. #42
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    ? SL teams are generally bad. You’re usually grabbing guys off the street to fill out a roster. I think there are two draft picks on this team.
    You basically know that - Branham sucks, Wesley sucks, Cissoko sucks, Ingram sucks, I will be very surprised Nunez will play in NBA at all.
    Noone from this SL roster would be anywhere near g-league.

    You have to put a roster, but come on, this team should be young and there is noone in 15-20 place in organisation worth developing.

  18. #43
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    On one hand, I think a lot of the criticism is valid because the choices for this roster are pretty bad. Going with seven short guards and no tall centers is weird. Too many players who have no hope of even sniffing the NBA.

    On the other hand, the Spurs were out arguably their five best summer league prospects: Castle, Cissoko, Duke, Gray and Minix. You take the top five players off any summer league team and it gets gross fast.
    Also...no one gives a about the Cali Classic. Pretty much a glorified pick-up game

    Hopefully we come correct in Vegas.

  19. #44
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,427
    You basically know that - Branham sucks, Wesley sucks, Cissoko sucks, Ingram sucks, I will be very surprised Nunez will play in NBA at all.

    Noone from this SL roster would be anywhere near g-league.
    like half of them already have been.

    Relax guys. Save your bile for the regular season.

  20. #45
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Even accepting your argument, the Spurs haven't done very well with their later second round picks.

    Last year they could have had GG Jackson at #44. Memphis took him at #45 as a two way as you suggest (although admittedly he didn't last as a two way, he ended up 2nd Team NBA All Rookie).

    In other words, just because you resign yourself to two ways later in the second round doesn't mean you have to choose bad ones, like the Spurs have.
    They were never going to choose GG. He has an absolute reputation.

  21. #46
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    You basically know that - Branham sucks, Wesley sucks, Cissoko sucks, Ingram sucks, I will be very surprised Nunez will play in NBA at all.
    Noone from this SL roster would be anywhere near g-league.

    You have to put a roster, but come on, this team should be young and there is noone in 15-20 place in organisation worth developing.
    Summer league rosters aren’t for development. They are warm bodies to put out on the court around the 1-3 players you ARE looking to develop.

    They
    Don’t
    Matter.
    Summer
    League
    Doesn’t
    Matter.

  22. #47
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    On one hand, I think a lot of the criticism is valid because the choices for this roster are pretty bad. Going with seven short guards and no tall centers is weird. Too many players who have no hope of even sniffing the NBA.

    On the other hand, the Spurs were out arguably their five best summer league prospects: Castle, Cissoko, Duke, Gray and Minix. You take the top five players off any summer league team and it gets gross fast.
    No wonder no one would tell me where Gray was and/or why he wasn't playing. I couldn't figure out what could possibly make it a top secret. I halfway thought he Primo'ed someone by how suddenly it was like he never existed. Turns out, the Spurs were just using a loophole by trading a two-way player in order to satisfy the new "touch" rule in trades. Pretty brilliant, tbh

  23. #48
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    Summer league rosters aren’t for development. They are warm bodies to put out on the court around the 1-3 players you ARE looking to develop.

    They
    Don’t
    Matter.
    Summer
    League
    Doesn’t
    Matter.
    But outside Castle, who was selected with 4 OA, there is noone worth developing. I dont care about SL results, the roster put there is just so bad and would make me thinking about whole scouting department.

  24. #49
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    But outside Castle, who was selected with 4 OA, there is noone worth developing. I dont care about SL results, the roster put there is just so bad and would make me thinking about whole scouting department.
    Did you not even read the first sentence of the post you quoted?

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    Did you not even read the first sentence of the post you quoted?
    Yes, I understood that, but later you wrote about looking for players to develop later on. There is noone like this there, Castle should be taken as far as they could from this team.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •