Reply With Quote
the spurs need to take care of biz.
If the Mavs win a ring I won't post for a year!
the spurs need to take care of biz.
DUDE....It's the 2000's....let me help you out:
So, Avery determines what he's going to work on in practice by watching TNT? That's a of a strategy.
That is why I do not like the new divisions. It used to be that the top team and 2nd best team (as far as record) always played everyone else until the conference finals.
The NBA needs to change the seeding, because the weaker division leader should not get the 3 seed over a better team in the toughest division. Everyone plays the same schedule in reg season except for maybe 2 games, so it makes sense that the top records should be seeded accordingly.
"Dallas is too deep to lose to any crappy team. If some players aren't performing they got a ton of bench players that make up for it. The only team that goes 12 men deep."
BS period, Spurs remain not only better (and will show it when it counts) but are deeper and in the playoffs which is an 8 man game, Pop will rely on experience and verve vs. "Keith Friggin Van Soft"
Don't believe the hype, Mavs are going to crash again.
oh Rummpd, your just a "hater"
Dallas will not make it out of the 2 round, count on it.
The Mavs are like Spurslite. Look at the team they start: an offensively limited defensive center, at the 2 and 3 a defender and athletic slasher, a scoring point guard, and a star power forward. problem is:
Duncan > Dirk
Rasho > Diop
Bruce > Griffen
Manu > Howard
Parker > Terry
And on the bench I'll take Nazr over Dampier, Finley over Stackhouse, and Horry over Van Horn (at least in the playoffs). Barry and Beno aren't all that much behind Harris and Daniels either, if at all.
Across the board I just dont see them having the talent OR team concept to beat us in a series. Avery is an awesome coach too, we always knew he would be, but I'll trust pop not to get outcoached.
Mavs are better this year. They're good.
Unless SA loses tonight, they aren't really trying to catch Dallas in the loss column.
Yeah, no.Finley over Stackhouse
Well, i disagree, but even if you go with Stackhouse over Finley, it doesn't make up for the other disparities in a seven game series. Sorry.
well, since you said so I now believe it. Let's just wait and see what happens. You can't honestly say Dallas doesnt cause San Antonio problems.it doesn't make up for the other disparities in a seven game series. Sorry.
Man, you were right.
It took a long time for the Spurs to catch the Mavs.
^^^
Stackhouse>Finley anyday.
manu > stackhouse
your point?
Finley gettin' a ring > Stackhouse sittin' on his couch watching the playoffs/finals.
problems to maybe take them to 6 games instead of 4
i dont doubt dallas would be a decent opponent
but to think that they can beat SA in a 7 game series is ludicrous
ESPECIALLY if dallas doesn't have the HCA
Howard>Manu. Your point?
HAHAHAHAHHAHA OH MY GOD!
manu has a nba championship ring, an olympic gold medal, and is an nba all star
howard has yet to be an nba all star much less win ANYTHING of ANY SORT
he's a great kid and a good player, but for the love of god, i hope you are kidding!
tony parker >> josh howard
and tp isn't even as good as manu
That you smoke way too much of your mom's pube hair.
Just quit dip .
Josh Howard has been the reason for the mavs success. The guy dominates the boards, shuts down players, and is a scoring machine. You'll see in the playoffs.
With all that Manu > HimJosh Howard has been the reason for the mavs success. The guy dominates the boards, shuts down players, and is a scoring maching. You'll see in the playoffs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
