what the spurs or any nba team is concerned with and what their fans are concerned with are usually totally different things.
You're either an idiot or a big time homer. Unless the mavs are unhealthy, they have the potential to knock off the spurs. Whether that happens or not is the unknown. No other team in the west has a chance. The mavs are right there with the pistons and spurs. They just need to get Howard and Harris back and hopefully be a factor when the playoffs start.
what the spurs or any nba team is concerned with and what their fans are concerned with are usually totally different things.
We will find out soon, ever notice how teams either speed up or slow down after they get to 50 wins? Well, Spurs, Mavs, and Pissons are all at 50 wins with 18, 18, and 20 to go.
and you are not?
![]()
They are "right there".
And they will end up "right where they always do" after they lose in the playoffs. Home watching the finals on TV. That's got to suck.
You act like Dallas has some longstanding tradition of excellence.
When was the last time they won anything? k, come back when they do.
ok, let's be realistic here, with Amare probably out for the rest of the season and Nash has a recurring injury(ankle?), Dallas is team i consider as a threat to Spurs.
But if you win #1 spot in the West and if by any chance you face the Lakers in the 1st round, do you believe you had the best chance of continuing your quest for that le?
I am talking about positioning here.
The Spurs esp. Pops didn't care much about seedings right now(same as last yr, Suns was #1). And the Lakers most teams would definitely want to avoid come playoff time bec of PhilJackson & Kobe. And you lost 2 already to them. You'd win #1, your reward is the Lakers.
HCA is good but I think Pops is considering a seedling which gives the Spurs least headache come playoff time. Of course I didn't say we can't win over the Lakers in the playoffs but based on their playoff experience & Kobe, I'd rather have the Hornets or Denver.
What the does the past have to do with this season? Dallas is so much better with their continuous improvement of their young players. Duncan with PF so I don't see it as impossible to beat San Antonio like you do.
You talk about "the past" like it was ages ago.
It was last year. The teams are similar. The past does matter, here anyways.
The mavs are much better due to the improvement of Daniels, Harris, Howard, Nowitzki, and the additions of Diop and Finley leaving.![]()
Wow, and you called me a homer.
I called you a homer because you are totally discrediting what Dallas has done so far this year like things are exactly the same. If you don't see the statistical improvement of those players than you are blind also.
you know i heard this kind of posts from you a 100 times. You don't have to post it over and over again.
If there's one player I think can bring you the le it's Dirk...nobody else. Diop?. Daniels?
, Howard?
.
But I still think Dirk can't win over a healthy Duncan. My oh my he can't even guard Kirilenko the other day. you won alright but while watching the game i was thinking if I'm a Mavs fan, I'd be embarrassed.
I said the Spurs would beat the Mavs.
That isn't "discrediting" anything. I also said the Mavs have never won anything. That's just a simple statement of fact. Anything else I said that hurt your feelings?
Are you some fortune teller? Yes if the spurs played the mavs now with the injuries the spurs would win. But if the mavs are healthy and Duncan continues to have problems with PF the mavs have a 'chance' to win the series. I have no problem with the fact on the past but I disagree that just because it happened before means it will happen theory with the mavs and spurs. Dirk has the most help he has ever had offensively and defensively.
Weird thread.
If the Spurs are focused on staying ahead of the Mavs or the Pistons or both, all they can do is win their own games. They can't control the other teams' losses. So what does this thread even mean?!?!
You want them to concentrate harder on the Pistons?! What will that do? If they concentrate really hard will the Pistons start losing?
2000-2001 Mavs = 53-29 5th best record in the L - Lost to SA in Semis
2001-2002 Mavs = 57-25 4th best record in the L - Lost to SAc in Semis
2002-2003 Mavs = 60-22 2nd best record in the L - Lost to SA in WCF
2003-2004 Mavs = 52-30 7th best record in the L - Lost to SAc in 1st Round
2004-2005 Mavs = 58-24 4th best record in the L - Lost to PHX in Semis
2005-2006 Mavs = 50-14 so far 3rd best record in the L
Looks about the same to me. All is as it should be.
Look at the pistons experiences before knocking off the lakers in 5 games. I think the mavs have deepest and most talented team in the league. Maybe they lack a low post prescence and aren't as focused on defense as the spurs but this years team is for real.
I still think it's about who is healthy. Is 1st place important? Yes...
If it important enough to bang up your team and blow your peak? No.
Remember how long our season was last year so other teams besides Det are
more rested. Not to mention some of our players where playing all Summer.
You know I think we are doing just fine right now.
Yeah your right, they had already won two 'ships. Very good analogy.
Why do we discuss anything on this site?
Nothing we say here will have any affect on anything. I made this thread for people who already are scoreboard watching to see how the Mavs did that day. My point is simply, stop keeping an eye on the Mavs. The team that really matters is the Pistons.
There is nothing "weird" about that.
like the late 80's has anything to do with them winning their last championship. I was talking about 99-03 and the spurs 94-98. The spurs used to be a regular season team.
![]()
The point is that the Spurs just need to win as many games as they can. That's all they can control. How did you conclude everyone is concentrating on the Mavs and not on the Pistons? Every day here people are talking about how they need to catch (and pass) the Pistons because they blew the 2 games against them.
You're right.
I'm wrong.
It's sad a f'ing screen name has put a target on my back.
Wait, so the past matters now?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)