I dont think she was talking to you. I think she was psuedo-addressing NBA refs to 'chill out'.
Just my interpretation.
The bits of the Game 1's I saw this year seemed to be pretty well handled. Not too many whistles, even with play a bit rougher. I didn't mind those at all.
But after Manu blowing up Artest's lip, Artest trying to cheapshot several Spurs upside the head, Hasleem through his mouthpiece at a ref, etc...
I can understand the game 2's being called very tight. the whole sending a message thing. If it continues to be called that tight, they'll lose the casual audience though.
I dont think she was talking to you. I think she was psuedo-addressing NBA refs to 'chill out'.
Just my interpretation.
That's exactly what I meant. Thanks.
My bad than, I apologize about that.
Yeah the game 1's were pretty much left alone but if they continue to try to keep the emotions down for the games coming up then I see it being more of a problem because the players and coaches will only take so much.
Don't worry, things het misinterpreted online.
Chalk it up to lack of connotation in the written word. Thats why good authors get paid the big bucks.
SURE,
ITs GO...followed by a SPURS then a GO again! once u go "BLACK" u'll never go back to CATS ;-) !!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No, it's not you. I agree as well. The officiating is dicatating the pace and the tempo of the game. Players will go hard at it defensivley and it will cool down due to an uneccessary whistle slowing down the pace of the game.
Last edited by E20; 04-28-2006 at 07:50 PM.
It's just you.
Just watch and enjoy. Complaining about refs should be below all spurs fans.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)