Upon further review:

[picnroll]

I'd love to see Stu Jackson try to break down the last five minutes of that game on his NBA TV show. Not going to happen.

[Jimcs50]

Hey JimCS

Very lazy point about "that was one bad call for you versus a thousand." The point is, your analysis is SELECTIVE and thus not credible. You cannot only include calls that go against your team; its intellectually dishonest.

You guys have been watching too much crybaby basketball for too long.

There was one bad call for SA, that was when Manu got a questionable call with about 5 mins left, but that was all that I saw, and that was just your every day bad call. These calls that I made note of were so clearly wrong that I really think that the refs are affraid of Mark Cuban.

The Spurs had good refs last night and I had no problems with these refs before, that is what pisses me off so much. Had it been Bennett Salvatore, I could have lived with it. But the scary things is, the Spurs have not had their bad refs yet and they need to win 3 of next 4 games.

[weebo]

Hey JimCS

Very lazy point about "that was one bad call for you versus a thousand." The point is, your analysis is SELECTIVE and thus not credible. You cannot only include calls that go against your team; its intellectually dishonest.

You guys have been watching too much crybaby basketball for too long.

Why can't he do that? Cuban does it all the time.

[bowenuglyduncanuncool]

Have you guys ever heard of principal?
Whether it was one bad call or 100, the point is if your going to criticize refs and have credibility, you have to also consider bad calls that went in your teams favor. Anyone disagree with this? You may have to get a little philosophical for a second and not just revert to being a knee-jerk Spurs apologist.

[Big Worm]

MVP so far of the playoffs = NBA Referees

It's hard to read this topic any further............There is only so much crying a person can take..................

[picnroll]

Have you guys ever heard of principal?
Whether it was one bad call or 100, the point is if your going to criticize refs and have credibility, you have to also consider bad calls that went in your teams favor. Anyone disagree with this? You may have to get a little philosophical for a second and not just revert to being a knee-jerk Spurs apologist.

Look you got the win, you didn't deserve it. Live with it. Don't try to pretend it was legitimate too.

[1Parker1]

2. Dirk dribbles the ball off his foot, in top of the key area, then tries to retrieve the ball, diving out of bounds, Barry is called for tripping, and the replay showed that Brent was nowhere near Dirk, and Dirk just fell out of bounds. Dirk hits 2 FTs

That foul pissed me off the most. Replay upon replay show Barry was nowhere NEAR tripping Dirk on that play. It was so ridiculous.

Anyways, blaming refs won't get us anywhere. Great teams, like the Spurs have in the past, learn to play through bad officiating and still win.

With that said though, a 30-50 FT differential in favor of the Spurs would have had Cuban's blog on fire and Avery throwing a tantrum. Good thing Spurs are more mature and above all that.

[Jimcs50]

It's hard to read this topic any further............There is only so much crying a person can take..................

I do not cry about the refs. look at the game blog from last night and see for yourself. I was trying to remain calm, but after watching the repaly, I had to speak up for my team.

You are a true homer, if you do not agree with these horrendous calls.

[picnroll]

True Spurs fans complain but Cuban would bleed out from his menses.

[LEONARD]

You got one bad call on your side. Why don't you acknowledge ours because you're complaining that we're whining and then you bring up the call on Howard. Cry me a river.

Do you honestly think there was only ONE bad call that went in the Spurs favor??? WTF???

[Deb]

It's hard to read this topic any further............There is only so much crying a person can take..................

Get a new picture. You've posted this one on every thread in here.

[Jimcs50]

With that said though, a 30-50 FT differential in favor of the Spurs would have had Cuban's blog on fire and Avery throwing a tantrum. Good thing Spurs are more mature and above all that.

Spot on.

I can live with the FT descrepency, but not blatantly poor calls that affect the outcome.

As I said, we still have Bevetta and Salvatore on our schedule, and that scares the out of me.

[picnroll]

Do you honestly think there was only ONE bad call that went in the Spurs favor??? WTF???

So bring out another blatant bad call in the last five minutes. And don't try the Amstrong block or I'll TIVO your ass.

[bowenuglyduncanuncool]

Alright guys...i tried reasoning...i even tried getting a little philosophical with you...but at the end of the day, i've realized you can't talk logically to a crying infant child.

So..........
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[weebo]

Have you guys ever heard of principal?
Whether it was one bad call or 100, the point is if your going to criticize refs and have credibility, you have to also consider bad calls that went in your teams favor. Anyone disagree with this? You may have to get a little philosophical for a second and not just revert to being a knee-jerk Spurs apologist.

How many calls can you name that went in the Spurs favor in the last five minutes of a one point game?

[Jimcs50]

How many calls can you name that went in the Spurs favor in the last five minutes of a one point game?

* crickets chirping*

[greensborohill]

I watched it again. . Duncan got him on the arm and with the body. . . it was a foul.

[Jimcs50]

I watched it again. . Duncan got him on the arm and with the body. . . it was a foul.

The 5th foul??? You mean the one where Dirk shoved Bruce out of the way first???? Where Dirk should have gotten the foul BEFORE TD fouled Dirk????


Not the 6th foul??? The one where Dirk fell into TD???

[greensborohill]

The 6th foul, when TD was in the restricred area and Dirk took it to the rim and drew contact with TD's body and TD got him on the arm.

[picnroll]

TD didn't get him on the arm. There was no contact of Duncan's arm and Dirks.

[KingsFanWithoutName]

3. 2:54 left, Spurs up 2 pts. Tony clearly gets pushed in the back cutting to the basket and knocked down just as TD passes the ball, and the ball goes out of bounds, resulting in anothet turnover for SA.

Result: Loss of possession, and possible basket and points.

If you really did rewatch these plays, you would clearly see Parker stepped on a Mavericks foot and that is what caused the fall. This thread is some serious bull .

[LEONARD]

If you really did rewatch these plays, you would clearly see Parker stepped on a Mavericks foot and that is what caused the fall. This thread is some serious bull .

LMAO...no kidding! Parker pushed in the back? He cut thru and tripped on Howard's foot. Incidental...good call...

[mouse]

Get a new picture. You've posted this one on every thread in here.

get some new smack and I will , off and Re is so 1993

[greensborohill]

TD didn't get him on the arm. There was no contact of Duncan's arm and Dirks.

watch it again. . .

besides, dude was in the restricted area and made contact with his body as well. It was a foul.

[KingsFanWithoutName]

You'd be whining and crying too if this was happening to the Mavs.

So you are admitting to whining and crying?