This thread is rife with.....
![]()
Whoa, you want me to meet up with you and pack your fanny? Slow down. It was bad enough that you called me "baby faced."
Also, just an aside, but I believe "Mick" stopped being an insult of any substance in about 1962.
It's nice to know that you are so readily to engage in violence against those who disagree with you. I'm confused, that seems like something only 'Religious Reich' members would do.
This thread is rife with.....
![]()
Just as I thought. You're an internet . Real big at the keyboard, but a coward at heart. Did mommy cut the crusts off your sammiches and cause you to get beat up at school?
Matt is definitely not giving off any...more like estrogen.
Yeah well your mom dresses you funny.
Damn, this is why I hate discussing politics. People lose their temper in a hurry and resort to grade school name calling.
Is that the American Gladiators theme song that just started playing?
Man what happened to the fight smilie?
The fanny pack stuff is kind of funny because me and some friends at work just weened a guy off wearing one. We had an intervention.
AndrewSullivan.com
Oh, now I get it. James Taranto is suddenly aghast and upset at gay-baiting! Better late than never, I suppose. In fact, I'm deeply heartened by so many Republicans suddenly concerned about the smearing of sexuals for political purposes. The reason for Taranto's assertion? He says that Kerry was pandering to the anti-gay parts of the Democratic base, by letting the last few souls on earth know, in an entirely positive way, that the vice-president's daughter is openly gay. And the way Kerry "gay-baited" was to say that sexuality is not a choice, that he supports equal rights for gay couples, and that Mary Cheney helps prove that being gay isn't a choice. That'll rile 'em up in the trenches, won't it? Seriously, I've called out anti-gay statements by Democrats in the past; and have a long record of sniffing out phobia and the use of it, wherever it's coming from. Certainly my record is, shall we say, more substantial than Taranto's in this regard. And I fail to see how Kerry's remark could be understood in any conceivable way as gay-baiting. It never occurred to me when I heard it. It does not occur to me now. You know what is based in gay-baiting? Implicitly, clearly, shamelessly: the Bush-Cheney campaign. The GOP has a nutty candidate in Illinois who called Mary Cheney a "selfish hedonist" - but Cheney wasn't an "angry dad," then. Lynne Cheney didn't call that "tawdry." So Bush runs the most anti-gay national campaign ever and it's his opponent who gets tarred as a phobe! Brilliant, even by Rove's standards. And when it comes to gay-baiting, there are few as practised as Rove. The sheer nerve of these hypocrites never ceases to amaze.
Now that we have gotten the fight out of the way, back to the original topic. Here is a excellent article that rings so true about this whole controversy...
Washington PostOutrage That Rings False
By Hilary Rosen
Saturday, October 16, 2004; Page A23
Nicolle Devenish, communications director for the Bush-Cheney campaign, said Thursday that John Kerry will pay a heavy political price for what he did. Lynne Cheney, the vice president's wife, said, "This is a bad man."
----------------
The response from the Cheneys and the Bush campaign has been blatantly political. In fact, it is they who are using Mary Cheney -- using her now to score points against Kerry and John Edwards over an issue on which they themselves are guilty of the wrongs that Kerry and Edwards are fighting against. Even after almost 30 years in Washington, I am surprised by the overwhelming hypocrisy and meanness of the Bush reelection campaign.
Let's review the facts. Before the election season, this administration opposed every initiative to offer equality for gay men and lesbians. Indeed, it has gone out of its way to be punitive, with such actions as the Office of Personnel Management's announcement that the federal government has no intention of honoring the Clinton administration's order to add sexual orientation to anti-discrimination rules in the federal government.
After the debate, the vice president said of John Kerry: "This is a man who will say anything and do anything to get elected." Many people thought the same thing about Cheney and President Bush on Feb. 24. That was the day the president announced to the country that heterosexual marriages are in trouble because gay people might someday have such a right in a few states. The crisis was so dire that he implored Congress to pass a cons utional amendment to permanently take away any rights gay men and lesbians might have to equal access to government benefits of marriage.
(More)
Pat Robertson: Blames Mary Cheney, by extension, of responsibility for 9/11 terrorist attacks. "I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America--I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen."(September 2001)
Lynn and Cheney's response: Silence
Rick Santorum: Accuses Mary Cheney, by definition, of immorality comparable to polygamy, adultery and incest. "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything." (April 2003)
Lynn and Cheney's response: Silence
Alan Keyes: Specifically accuses Mary Cheney, by name, of being a "selfish hedonist." (August 2004)
Lynn and Cheney's response: Silence
John Kerry: Sympathetically and eloquently explains that the Cheney's gay daughter is "she's being who she was. She's being who she was born as."
Lynn and Cheney's response: THIS IS NOT A GOOD MAN!!!! WHAT A CHEAP AND TAWDRY POLITICAL TRICK!!! YOU SAW A MAN WHO WILL DO AND SAY ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)