A.I. and ___ for Parker?

[Fabbs]

A realistic trade (monetarily) would be Tony and Manu for AI.

And I think we all agree that no one here would do that.

Blasphemous!
Oh you meant the money part. You know, some wish Stern and the owners would scap all this dollar for dollar, or at least make it wayy more flexible.

[Fabbs]

It won't. It is not even close. What is the point of discussing complete bull pipe dreams?

Hey dude. To see you sitting at your keyboard and how fast you would pounce on a technicality that RobotTrader.com says it will not give you permission to think about.

Take another hit and tell us what you think about the player trade?

[exstatic]

Blasphemous!
Oh you meant the money part. You know, some wish Stern and the owners would scap all this dollar for dollar, or at least make it wayy more flexible.

They have. It used to be a 15% difference in salary. Now it's 25%. Your "trade" still isn't even on the right planet.

[ShoogarBear]

This trade doesn't even work on NBA Live, and every trade works on NBA Live.

It's time to retire ABC.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Hey dude. To see you sitting at your keyboard and how fast you would pounce on a technicality that RobotTrader.com says it will not give you permission to think about.

Take another hit and tell us what you think about the player trade?

What is the point of thinking about a trade that isn't remotely possible?

[Fabbs]

They have. It used to be a 15% difference in salary. Now it's 25%. Your "trade" still isn't even on the right planet.

Move it 60%. Add some Spurs benchees. Have Holt see what happened to Kenneth Lay and decide the going over the lux tax is well worth it for back to back les. How about now?

[exstatic]

Move it 60%. Add some Spurs benchees. Have Holt see what happened to Kenneth Lay and decide the going over the lux tax is well worth it for back to back les. How about now?

60% still doesn't work, AI makes 100% more than Tony, at LEAST. Before you go and say 100%, I dont' do "what ifs". If it doesn't work in the real world, it's not worth discussing, to me, anyways.

[Fabbs]

You guys must be a blast to party with.

[Spurs9]

This trade doesn't even work on NBA Live, and every trade works on NBA Live.

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Fabbs=Awmyplace

[kite]

AI makes 18,281,250, and Parker makes 9,450,000 no way it can happen

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Why would they take our trash for A.I. when they have better offers from other teams on the table?

[Obstructed_View]

Mr Fabbs, the thread you've started is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having clicked on it. I declare this the dumbest thread of the day, and may God have mercy on your soul

[Fabbs]

Mr Fabbs, the thread you've started is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having clicked on it. I declare this the dumbest thread of the day, and may God have mercy on your soul

Maybe you will get laid sometime in this lifetime.

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

Assume Philly eats a bunch of money. They wont.

You keyboard commandoes get your panties all in a bunch because Trader.com says the numbers dont match. I'm talking about the players.

Dude, are you from Saturn?

AI makes 20mil per, Dalembert makes 10mil per, Parker makes 10mil per. We'd have to give then like 7 players plus TP. Either way, Parker is young, still improving and on a very decent contract. AI is old.

Oh, and AI and TD on the same team!? You gotta be kidding...

[jman3000]

Pretend that we're on Mars and there is no salary cap! [/fabbs]

[THE SIXTH MAN]

Pretend that we're on Mars and there is no salary cap! [/fabbs]

[Obstructed_View]

Maybe you will get laid sometime in this lifetime.

Not only are you a moron, your comebacks suck.

[Fabbs]

"Fabbs, today yours is the worst thread ever. We are not allowed to think that way on SpursTalk.com It is vital that the numerical figures for all proposed players trades match up exactly."

The above photo ^^^ of all of you.


I accept your flaming.
Fabbs.

p.s. can we now get on with the Jacques Vaughn threads?

[Obstructed_View]

"It is expected that the numerical figures for all proposed players trades are in remotely the same ing universe."

Fixed.

[Fabbs]

Fixed. Fabbs when i first saw your post and saw the numerical figures did not add up in my universe exactly so, i looked like this.
My bloodpressure was then sent skyrocketing like AltoMans.

However now that we have seriously dogged you on your lack of correct numerical trade figures Fabbs, i can resume my universe and posting.

Okay Obstucted and all, you got me.

[Obstructed_View]

Okay Obstucted and all, you got me.

No, basically oli got you when he said:

What is the point of thinking about a trade that isn't remotely possible?

[Fabbs]

No, basically Fabbs you got me you and all of us when you gave us these lovely flowers.

Now we can get back to discussing Benos exact numerical salary.
Thanks Fabbs. Lets call it a night.

Okay Obstucted and all. Thanks for accepting the flowers as my apology and good night to all.

[jman3000]

Tony Parker for Shaq, D-Wade, and Haslem ... I'd do it.

[Sense]

Wow Fabbs... you got burned sooo many times..


this thread was funny, thanks for waking me up a lil.