I'm fine with keeping Tony Parker. This trade is not gonna happen. Or is it?
Disclaimer I like Tony Ps game. He did great in the playoffs, I blame CementHead Pop for leaving him in Gm 6 up 20 points in Sacto with the game in the bag and Mad Dog Artest just looking to lay a lickin on someone. He did, it was Tony. Reinjured hip/groin/thigh whatever and was not the same vs Dallas. Kori eyewitness testified he could not walk between games.
If you think we needing him in the game that late vs Sacto then go have a wine cooler with Pop.
Now as to the proposed trade.
1 A.I. and Samuel Dalembert for Parker. Done and done? There is our servicable center? Sure he is 31 and I don't like A.I.s punk-rappa-chip-on-shoulder-i be-da-viktum at ude. However dude can ball and his assists have been getting much better each year, even with butterfingers Dalembert fumbling away numerous would-be assists at Center.
2 A.I. and Andre Iguodala for Parker. Yeah we would then have a glut at GF but Igs is only 22 and just keeps getting better. I would move Fins and Barry to try to get the elusive seviceable Center.
I'd rather take Shaq and Dwayne Wade for Parker personally
You obviously have that whole 'salary cap' thing covered pretty well don't you?
Genius thread
i bet we could get a couple of AI's cornrows and igoudala for parker... then we could just grow our own AI
Throw in Oberto, Beno, Bonner, etc.
Lets hear your trade proposals numb nutts.
The shelf life on small guards over 30 is very short, measured in one or two high level seasons, followed by a quick and sharp decline. Since AI has 3 years and close to $60M left on his deal, Spurs would be left holding the bag while Philly enjoys 8-10 years of Parker, assuming SA could put together enough OTHER players just to get AI without gutting the team.
This trade doesn't even work on NBA Live, and every trade works on NBA Live.
Fabbs-
on the most re ed trade proposal to date.
Absolutely if we did not le at least once and preferably back to back or 2 of 3 i would consider it a failure. However Igs could be the GF for the next 8-10 also.
^^ oh that's right. A.I. might not go for throwing it in to Tim and standing around and Dumping.![]()
contracts dont work, and iversons contract is nasty no way, even dalemberts contract is nasty who doesnt do anything.
ai2+KK or draft pick then i would do straight up for tp
This thread needs to be CLASSIC-FIED immediately before much more damage is done
Get back to me when you prove 10 = 27.
Assume Philly eats a bunch of money. They wont.
You keyboard commandoes get your panties all in a bunch because Trader.com says the numbers dont match. I'm talking about the players.
it's 8:43pm cst and spurs fans are still trading tony parker
Philly can't "eat money" and in the REAL world, the numbers have to match.
Alright!Assume Philly eats a bunch of money.. WTF was I supposed to assume it then?They wont.
Why not just trade Parker for Dwayne Wade and Shaq, straight up. Maybe Miami will even throw in Mourning to sweeten the deal.
A realistic trade (monetarily) would be Tony and Manu for AI.
And I think we all agree that no one here would do that.
Dumper when i originally typed this up, I was going to put "assume the money will all work" even if it won't. Then i thought I'll see how many fish i can catch. Anyways, you were trying to point out the math. Yes, due to Phillys outrageous overpayment to Dalembert, it wont work. So lets just roll with getting it closer, throw in Oberto Bonner etc and then what do you all think playerwise?
extacix again, Igs could be the GF for years to come and his D has the potential to keep growing to Bowen type status. Have you seen Igs shut down Kobe? Not every game but several games he clamped him.
It won't. It is not even close. What is the point of discussing complete bull pipe dreams?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)