Reply With Quote
Eh, I get annoyed at how much they show her at the games. I don't need to see her over and over, and they do still show her a lot. Or they did at the end of the season.
If he doesn't dislike her, what does it matter how many times they show her at the games? I would like to see a whole lot less of Cuban during Spurs/Mavs games, but that's mainly because I can't stand him. That's where I'm making the connection.
Besides, like I've already said, they don't show her on local broadcasts anymore, which makes up most of the game broadcasts. I don't know... I guess I just don't see what the big deal is whether they show her or not.
Eh, I get annoyed at how much they show her at the games. I don't need to see her over and over, and they do still show her a lot. Or they did at the end of the season.
At least the show Eva with makeup on.
If I had to pick one, definitely Bonzi.. reminds me a bit of Barkley .. can hit the outside shot but can go inside and wreak havoc.. now if only he could play consistent defense.. but then again, neither did Barkley..
i keep reading about how dreadful q's defense is, but i don't remember bonzi ever being a defenisive jaugernaut himself. i would pass on both at the moment
Sure, Q makes $7 mil this year, & in 2009-2010, he'll be making $9.3 mil..that is a horrendous contract...you think he's worth what Manu makes?
And besides this is a moot point, we will not be getting either one...where did this idea about Q come from anyways, is this a rumor or a fans fantasy? Sorry, been working for 10+ hours & didn't spell check..give me a ing break.
Last edited by Big P; 07-30-2006 at 11:47 PM.
umm what?
Not rumor, or fan fantasy actually. I just read the thread about the rediculous idea of getting Bonzi Wells from the Kings and figured if we were going after power guards w/ bloated contracts I'd rather have Q-Rich. I'm actually not advocating getting either, but I put the scenario out there to see what others thought. Glad to hear everyone thinks it's a bad idea.
Having said that, I think that Q-Rich and Bonzi are virtually the same player w/ potentially bad contracts and their own set of different risks. I don't see how some could view giving Bonzi $8 mil a year for the next four years is a smart move...it would be the same or worse than trading for Quentin Richardson.
I maintain what I've maintained all along....that we should wait for some young swingman to become expendable or hit the doghouse and use our leverage (cap space in the form of Eric Williams) to acheive the goal of getting a young swingman.
BTW it's moot point, not mute...for future reference
SPEAK LOUDER, THEN!
With Al Harrington headed back to Indy, doesn't that make Jax available? If so, I'll take 3 Jaxes and a Bonzi before I even look at QRich, and when I do finally take a look at QRich, it's with the stink-eye!!!
Quentin Richardson??? No way. Overpriced and (was) over-rated.
Oh, and he's been in the league long enough to prove that he will never be a decent defender. Pulease.
, give me 4 Jumaine Joneses and we'll call it a day!
q.r thinks his a sharpshooter behind the arc, which he isnt = chucker
Career numbers...identical
But the point is well taken:
Bad Contracts...identical
Risk Level....identical
Payoff...subpar
I'd say get neither but just wanted to know what yall thought.
Quentin and Brandy broke off their engagement a while back. Now there is no reason at all to trade for him.basketball wise the above posters have already told us why he sucks and won't be on spurs any time soon...
I will give you a different spin...
with QRich comes this....
at the ferocious defense of overexposure.
Bonzi is a very good player, but he is not a nice guy.
Brandy and QRich aren't together anymore anyway.
I'd take Q on the Spurs just because I have a friend who gets first row tickets from him everytime he visits Staples.
Bonzi Wells is a lot better than any of the Spurs (besides Duncan)
I take production over "nice guys" any day
Q-Rich is a more expensive version of Brent Barry.
Differences are that he's a better rebounder and interior scorer than Bones, but is a worse defender and a less polished passer.
Yeah, Bonzi has two rings and has been an all-star (both Parker and Ginobili)!?
C'mon, Bonzi couldn't carry the jock of either Ginobili or Parker! He's a good player who is very good at a couple of things, but he doesn't make his teamates better and has always been one of the worst cancers in the league. One playoff series doth not make a Manu or TP! They've proven themselves to be better players in far less time, and what has Bonzi done? He's played a great series against us in 2006, averaged 12.8/4.7/2.3/1.37 shooting .464 .335 .712 over an unremarkable 10 yr xareer, and a total of 36 playoff games. But no, he's A LOT better than Manu or TP.
PWNED.
Shmuck.
Get your head checked.
Last edited by RuffnReadyOzStyle; 08-02-2006 at 06:41 PM.
You forgot that Q-Rich can't hold Barry's jock as a shooter.
jes you are right. it just................ slip through his fingers. hehehehe
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
