This is rich.
I'm Canadian bag
This is rich.
I'm Canadian bag
why don't you start by getting your grammatic data correct ?.. ing -bag
Okay, so you're a Canadian bag behaving like a redneck American.
Drop the racial slurs and we're quits.
losing to L.A it doesnt mean the spurs lose everything.... got!lol!
Okay, I apologize for the Polish remarks
I know its just one loss, but they definitely aren't going to win the championship as of now. I would still have said that even if they had won. They have a lot to improve on.
You're calling me a ing -bag because I used an "e" instead of an "i"?
First, that would be a spelling issue, not a grammar issue, your ing inbred ass-munching bas .
ing mavs fans, always jerking off on their keyboards as they try to post.
Ouch. Dallas gets blown out in Utah as Sloan gets his 1000th win. Less than 11 hours pass and these rankings get water poured all over them.
lol, this shut everyone up.
Then we'll lose, then they'll come back. Then they'll shut up... Oh the life of Spurs fans.
1. Utah 16-5 .762
2. San Antonio 16-6 .727
3. Phoenix 14-6 .700
4. Los Angeles Lakers 14-6 .700
5. Dallas 14-7 .667
Lakers are good but no way will they stay a fourth seed. I hope they get matched up with Dallas in the playoffs though!
Kobe would go insane.
exactly!
A loss is classic Walton MO, actually, its his only MO.
So the Spurs were the in 2004-2005 when they were 17-5 at this exact same point? As opposed to them being 16-6 now? Or how about when they were 13-9 in 2002-2003. I bet you were on the verge of cutting your pecker off, or atleast trying to find it so that you could then cut it off.
First 22 games:
2002-2003: 92 PS 88 PA (13-9)
2004-2005: 96 PS 85 PA (17-5)
2006-2007: 100 PS 91 PA (16-6)
Buddy Holly highlighted another key stat in that barrage - point differential, which is still high for the Spurs - tops in the league.
Last edited by RonMexico; 12-12-2006 at 02:38 AM.
Wow. You been drinkin?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)