Bet No One Read This In The Newspaper

[xrayzebra]

Ok Ray you your kind supports the troops by putting them in harms way for nothing. Your kind supports unecessary wars but,but,but you support the troops.. blood on our hands? The GOP is drenched in GI blood..Ray, Bush started this war and it's his repsonsibility..

Think now RAy..if Bush has changed tactics we could assume the previous plan was not working.. so who is repsonsible for the blood spilled because of the bad plan? Let me guess the MSM? CLintons? democrats?


Wow another straw man argument from Ray..the MSM.. I am hopeful one day one Bushbot will define and explain who this MSM is.. From what I gather it's any en y that dares to report anything bad about Bush or the GOP.. I notice the talking heads who blame the MSM never address the story..just who is reporting it..

If you had a brain you would take it out and play with it.
Why do you think we have had no attacks within the
US for the past six years? Because the dimm-o-craps
have opposed every proposal made by Bush? Hmmmm,
it is because we have the bad guys tied up in Iraq, stupid!

The only way this nation can be defeated is how the
dimm-o-craps and people like you are attempting. Destroy
us from within. What is the dimm-o-crap plan? Defeat
of our nation by those who want to destroy us. We
suffered one defeat because of the same people who want
us to suffer a defeat again. I remember some idiot saying
killing all those people at WTC was not grounds for us to
go to war. Yeah, that is mentality of people of your class.

John Murtha is what he is a low class, s bag politician
who is crooked as a dog's hind leg and aided by people
like Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, and on and on and on. And
never forgot the biggest hero of the left, Hanoi Jane.

Yes, dummy, the blood of our troops is on your and your
dimm-o-craps hands. You are the ones who support our
enemies and hinder a commander-in-chief who is trying
to protect our country. You are wrong as two left feet
and the left leaning groups you support.

I love your statement, Bush started the war, really, who
the bombed our WTC (twice), Barracks in Saudi Arabia, killed
our troops in Somalia, bombed out warship. Damn sure
wasn't Bush.

[ChumpDumper]

I remember some idiot saying
killing all those people at WTC was not grounds for us to
go to war.

I remember some idiot saying Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks. It takes all kinds.

[johnsmith]

I remember some idiot saying Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks. It takes all kinds.

Just the mention of 9/11 is making me cringe now because it opens up the thread to "what really happened on that day" nonsense.

[xrayzebra]

^^What really happened was a group of terrorist few two
aircraft into the WTC and killed over two thousand people.

[ChumpDumper]

mouse still has another 10 hours of the same videos for me to watch.

[Yonivore]

I remember some idiot saying Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks. It takes all kinds.

Really? Who said that Master Baiter?

[ChumpDumper]

Really? Who said that Master Baiter?

You don't remember that linkage, Pollyanna?

Why have you spent five years trying to link Saddam and Al Qaeda anyway?

[Yonivore]

You don't remember that linkage, Pollyanna?

Why have you spent five years trying to link Saddam and Al Qaeda anyway?

No one ever said Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, Master Baiter.

[ChumpDumper]

Maybe this will refresh your memory:

This shows that the connections to the Saddam regime went much higher than previously thought. Uday himself made the arrangements with the Sudanese government in December 1994. Osama met directly with the General Director of the IIS. Even after he left the Sudan, the Sudanese continued to act as a conduit between Osama and Iraq, at the behest of Saddam Hussein -- and the IIS states that they were actively working to connect to Osama again after he landed in Afghanistan.

During this period of 1996, al-Qaead bombed the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. In 1998, Osama issued his fatwa against the US. The embassy attacks in Africa followed, and then the bombing of the USS Cole -- and finally, 9/11.

One has to wonder how successfully the IIS was in its project to "revitalize" their relationship.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...58&postcount=1

[ChumpDumper]

No one ever said Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, Master Baiter.

And of course plenty of folks all over the country said Saddam was behind 9/11. I'd tell you not to be an idiot, but you can't help yourself.

[ChumpDumper]

Their relationship was anything but superficial and while there isn't any specific evidence (yet) pointing to directed support for 9/11, by Iraq, that doesn't mean al Qaeda didn't benefit from their relationship in ways that were detrimental to our interests.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...9&postcount=24

[Yonivore]

Okay, follow closely, Master Baiter;

Believing there was a relationship between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda is not the same as saying Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

Saddam Hussein wasn't behind the suicide bombings in Israel but, he certainly had a relationship with the Palestinians that were behind them.

You really are a stupid, stupid person.

[Yonivore]

And of course plenty of folks all over the country said Saddam was behind 9/11. I'd tell you not to be an idiot, but you can't help yourself.

And, whomever those folks are don't have the evidence to support that statement...even if they believe it is possible.

[ChumpDumper]

And, whomever those folks are don't have the evidence to support that statement.

People like you?

, the evidence is starting to point to the possibility -- although no on in this administration has ever made the assertion (as you untruthfully claim) -- that Iraq was, indeed, involved in the events of 9-11.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...5&postcount=85

You are such a ing liar, Yoni. It's so easy to own you, I'm beginning to think you like it.

[Yonivore]

People like you?
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...5&postcount=85

You are such a ing liar, Yoni. It's so easy to own you, I'm beginning to think you like it.

Still nothing.

No one has made the claim that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

, the evidence is starting to point to the possibility -- although no on in this administration has ever made the assertion (as you untruthfully claim) -- that Iraq was, indeed, involved in the events of 9-11.

What part of that do you construe to say Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11?

It may someday be known to be true but, as of today, no one -- in their right mind -- would make that claim.

You're trying to set up a straw man. I know your whole asswipe argument depends on someone actually making that claim but, too bad, no one said it. I can't help it if you're too stupid to understand the words you read and re-post.

[gtownspur]

Still nothing.

No one has made the claim that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.


What part of that do you construe to say Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11?

It may someday be known to be true but, as of today, no one -- in their right mind -- would make that claim.

You're trying to set up a straw man. I know your whole asswipe argument depends on someone actually making that claim but, too bad, no one said it. I can't help it if you're too stupid to understand the words you read and re-post.

I think it was the George Bush of the Spurstalk troll forum who probably said that Sadaam= 911/ Patriotic cakes= Military service, but Chump is a little slow regarding these things.

[Yonivore]

I think it was the George Bush of the Spurstalk troll forum who probably said that, but Chump is a little slow.

Yeah, hence the, "...no one -- in their right mind --..." inclusion.

[gtownspur]

Yeah, hence the, "...no one -- in their right mind --..." inclusion.

By those same standards we could extract qoutes were Clinton did want to invade Iraq during his tenure, making him a neocon gone Onstar lover aggie marriot- Saddleback Church attendant. Rofl Rofl.

[ChumpDumper]

What part of that do you construe to say Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11?

Probably the part where you say the evidence is pointing to Iraq's being involved in 9/11. And don't be ridiculous, there are still people in this country who believe it -- it's no shock that you were the first one to jump up and deny it.

[ChumpDumper]

I can't help it if you're too stupid to understand the words you read and re-post.

I can't help it if you're too stupid to understand the words you post.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't think there is anything simple about the mul ude of relationships the Ba'athist regime had with terrorism. I think it's a naive, simplistic, and restrictive view that believes no connection between Saddam Hussein and September 11th is simple or absolute.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...dam#post154340

You disingenuous piece of . You are too much of a coward to stand by your own words yet again.

[Yonivore]

Probably the part where you say the evidence is pointing to Iraq's being involved in 9/11. And don't be ridiculous, there are still people in this country who believe it -- it's no shock that you were the first one to jump up and deny it.

Long way from claiming Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

Do I believe he was involved in or behind 9/11? I think it's possible. Absolutely. And, in that thread I stated the evidence is "...starting to point to the possibility..."

That's no where close to a definitive claim that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11. You are a stupid .

[gtownspur]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...dam#post154340

You disingenuous piece of . You are too much of a coward to stand by your own words yet again.

I'm glad to see you think Yoni is your President.

But back to proving the president stated 9=11 was committed by Sadaam....

i won't hold your breath.

[Yonivore]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthre...dam#post154340

You disingenuous piece of . You are too much of a coward to stand by your own words yet again.

I stand by everything you've posted of mine. They just don't say what you claim. I know, I wrote them. I know what I meant when I hit the post button.

Conclusion? You're a ing idiot.

[ChumpDumper]

Do you believe Saddam was involved in the planning of 9/11?

Yes or no?