Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 47 of 47
  1. #26
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,461
    That's alright to about 60% of Americans Joe, but there is about 20% of Americans with a right-wing agenda to push and compromise isn't part of their plan.
    Completely made up and BS numbers.

  2. #27
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,461
    a administration who has used every means possible, some legal and some not, to push its agenda
    Statement without substance. Show one illegal move made by the administration to push its agenda.

    No thanks really to Lieberman though. He added very little to the Gore campaign.
    No one votes based on the VP canidate. They have little to no effect. Cheney has horrible negative numbers as well as poor health. No one cares. Quayle was ridiculed to no end, Bush still made it in. Bush's loss had nothing to do with Quayle. Liberman generally had higher positive numbers than Gore did. He is more likable than Gore and a much better speaker.


    Working with the administration in a bi-partisan manner doesnt make you a sell out. Refusing to do so makes you a sellout - a sellout of America. It means you put the democratic party above the United States of America - something I wouldnt put past an idiot like you.

  3. #28
    It's 11:46...and OU STILL sucks!!!!! jalbre6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    1,439
    Can't remember his name, but when that Senator switched parties in 2000, the Democrats were just praising his name...
    Senator Jeffords of Vermont switched from Republican to Independent in '01, but conferred with and supported Democrats then. If I remember correctly, it was to break a 50-50 stalemate in the Senate. Since then, he's never really sided with one party over the other.

    I think he's still the only Independent in the Senate.

  4. #29
    It's 11:46...and OU STILL sucks!!!!! jalbre6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    1,439
    No one votes based on the VP canidate.
    I agree, but saying that Lieberman is a lukewarm Democrat pisses me off. Just because he's not a far-leftie doesn't make the guy a dog turd. With the male half of the Clinton tag team duo out of the running, he's probably my favorite Democrat in office. Pro-security? Check. Pro-health care reform? Check. Pro small-business? Check. Pro school reform? Check. Pro-choice? Check.

    I'd be even a bigger fan if he wound up in a Republican president's cabinet. That just means that people with different political views than I have are smart enough to let one of ours sit at the table. Maybe both sides would learn something from this.
    Last edited by jalbre6; 11-19-2004 at 03:57 PM. Reason: spelling error

  5. #30
    I can live with it JoeChalupa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    21,547
    I Concur.

  6. #31
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    I'd be even a bigger fan if he wound up in a Republican president's cabinet. That just means that people with different political views than I have are smart enough to let one of ours sit at the table. Maybe both sides would learn something from this.
    Then he should run as a Republican because its obviouse that Progressives are headed in a different direction than Mr. Lieberman. The Right is being blinded by the light of Hillary Clinton. There are other formitable Democrats coming up the pike.

  7. #32
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Statement without substance. Show one illegal move made by the administration to push its agenda.
    dup

  8. #33
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Statement without substance. Show one illegal move made by the administration to push its agenda.
    5 words - Valarie Plame and Joe Wilson.

  9. #34
    I can live with it JoeChalupa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    21,547
    No, he should run as the moderate democrat that he is.
    Just like Henry Cuellar did.

  10. #35
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,461
    Then he should run as a Republican because its obviouse that Progressives are headed in a different direction than Mr. Lieberman. The Right is being blinded by the light of Hillary Clinton. There are other formitable Democrats coming up the pike.
    You are an idiot not to claim Liberman. The man is popular, and a moderate Democrat. I would be proud to have him in the Republican party.

    If the democrat party is to ever regain power, it will be because of moderates that appeal to the American people like Lieberman. A smart party would be pushing him to the front, not alienating him.

    But then again, a smart party wouldnt have been whipped like they were in the elections of 2004.

    In four years, Hillary is going to seem too moderate for you Dan.

  11. #36
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Lieberman would have beaten Bush.

  12. #37
    Gangsta Photog 2pac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,461
    Lieberman would have beaten Bush.
    I dont know how the world would have responded to hiring a Jewish president while we are in a war with Muslims.

  13. #38
    It's 11:46...and OU STILL sucks!!!!! jalbre6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    1,439
    Lieberman would have beaten Bush.
    Just my opinion, but I don't think he (Joe) would have been elected. It would have spun into a Christian vs. Jew campaign, and Lieberman wouldn't have stood a chance. That doesn't mean I don't wish that could have happened.

    I dont know how the world would have responded to hiring a Jewish president while we are in a war with Muslims.
    As far as this goes, most of the world hates Bush anyway. The US would just be accused -repeatedly- of having some sort of Zionist agenda with Lieberman in power. They'd still hate us, just with a different reason.

  14. #39
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    It would have spun into a Christian vs. Jew campaign, and Lieberman wouldn't have stood a chance.
    Christians may vote en masse on issues like abortion and gay marriage, but they're not anti-Semites. If the campaign had had any trace of antisemitism, it would have been very bad for the Bush campaign.

  15. #40
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Just my opinion, but I don't think he (Joe) would have been elected. It would have spun into a Christian vs. Jew campaign, and Lieberman wouldn't have stood a chance. That doesn't mean I don't wish that could have happened.

    As far as this goes, most of the world hates Bush anyway. The US would just be accused -repeatedly- of having some sort of Zionist agenda with Lieberman in power. They'd still hate us, just with a different reason.
    Yeah, I don't know how many of you saw that do entary on HBO that followed the Democratic Presidential candidates in the primaries, but Joe came across as a likeable enough guy, but well, he was kinda dry and I'm not talking dry like John Kerry dry either, I'm talking that I don't think Lieberman connected well with people. Someone you'd wanna work for, but as your President, pass.

    The U.S. sends billions in foreign aid every year to Middle East countries. Israel is by far the largest recepient but in secound place is the home of the Islamic Jihad, Egypt. The U.S. also sends millions to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and even the PLO gets a cut among other places. Most of this money falls through the cracks and into the hands of corrupt politicians so common Arabs rarely see any of the benefits.

    What Arabs do see in their Press and perceive from gossip is Israel, who is getting the biggest piece of the Middle East pie from the U.S. (although as a percentage of their GDP it's only 3%-5%) using their billions to purchase modern U.S. military equipment too, as they see it, counter the infada and protect illegal settlements. This is why I have always said that solving the Middle East puzzle starts with first solving the Palestinain-Israel question. Only by gaining the trust of Arabs first should the Iraq/Saddam problem been handled. Doesn't mean that Saddam and his sons didn't need to go, just that we went about it the wrong way.

  16. #41
    Homer 2centsworth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    8,677
    Nbadan,

    Most conservatives ignore your type of rambling, but I'm going to sink down and fight back a bit.

    9-10 democrats can't name one policy either Kerry, Leiberman, or any one else has ever sponsored. True meaning of stupid.

    9-10 democrats are in favor of a welfare state.

    That's the agenda that has lost and will continue to lose in the future. You don't know it, but you and Michael Moore are Godsends for the Republican Party. KOOKS!

  17. #42
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    9-10 democrats can't name one policy either Kerry, Leiberman, or any one else has ever sponsored. True meaning of stupid.
    As Governor of Texas W was more of a diplomat than anything else since the power to set the legislative agenda rests with the Lieutenent Governor. Name one significant piece of Legislation W sponsored or promoted as Governor of Texas, bet ya can't.

    I have written extensively about how John Kerry was instrumental in closeing down the number one terrorists bank - BCCI. One that had Bush family ties. What did Bush do as Governor of Texas to secure our borders? Did he increase funding for the border protrol? No. Did he make sure that Texas skies were protected? No. Did he have a civil emergency plan laid out in case of a WMD terrorist attack on a major metropolitan area? again No.

  18. #43
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    -10 democrats are in favor of a welfare state.
    Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility - Nope. Noninterventionism? nope. States Rights? Nope. Less Government? Nope.

    I guess molds are meant to be broken.

  19. #44
    Homer 2centsworth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    8,677
    KOOK!

    The legislature has the power but Bush was very influential in getting things done like tort reform, education reform, SBC to SA etc...

  20. #45
    Homer 2centsworth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    8,677
    Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility - Nope. Noninterventionism? nope. States Rights? Nope. Less Government? Nope.

    I guess molds are meant to be broken.
    Valid, unfortunately for you and michael moore people see through the democratic party.

  21. #46
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Lieberman would have been a tough matchup for Bush. Lieberman never changed his mind on the Iraq invasion nor had an indecipherable position on it and the "war on terror" unlike Kerry. With the Bush campaign unable to differentiate itself on those issues, then the campaign would have fallen into the domestic realm. Also, Lieberman's faith would have only been a plus in the campaign.

    But the Democrat base was far too bezerk to nominate Lieberman and they paid the price.

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    29,564
    I think I figured it out. Dan thinks the real war shouldn't be America vs. radislam, but Demos vs. Republicans.

    It's the only thing that makes sense.
    Wrong, Dan thinks the real war should be against America and the far left of the Democrats come closer to fitting his warlike needs.

    I can pretty much figure out the slant of any article Dan posts without actually reading it.

    Basically if an article or view casts America in a negative light he likes it...regardless of it contradicts any of his other negative views.

    Just take a look back on his threads...he pretty much is willing to post anything, even if it contradicts or invalidates other posts and statements he has made...as long as it's a negative view of America.

    You will not see Dan post or say anything positive about this country. Not one single thing...and if he has then someone please direct me to that thread and I will admit I was wrong.

    By the way...major props to Joe Chalupa for coming around now that the time for election partisianship is over....Meanwhile...Dan continues to be trapped in a maze of his own making...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •