He didn't stay with it at all times. He only played big for 6 minutes in the 4th quarter and abandoned it the last three minutes of a tie game, just like he did in the third game against these guys last January, with similar results.
Yes I think we all agree EFF smallball!
Let's just hope that CIA POP wasn't in action today and throwing the Dallas coaching staff off was not the only reason he stayed with 2 bigs at all times.
He didn't stay with it at all times. He only played big for 6 minutes in the 4th quarter and abandoned it the last three minutes of a tie game, just like he did in the third game against these guys last January, with similar results.
Not sure what to make of Elson. The spirit was willing but the flesh just had a quintuple espresso shot? Seemed very active, but somewhat, well, nervous.
+/- leaders tonight:
Horry +6
Duncan +5
Parker +4
Manu +1
That's a pretty good sign because that's four of the five players I want on the court at the end of the game versus the Mavs.
I don't mean to be sour grapes, but considering Dampier was out of the game (easily their best rebounder, if not second best I believe) I would be interested to see us outrebounding the Mavs with Damp in the game.
But still, I just hope Pop sees the Rebs stats and decides to stick with playing Big a little bit longer
Some games Horry has it and some games he doesn't. I'm thinking in most cases the 5th would be Bowen. As long as we're playing with two bigs, that's fine. If we're small though, I'd prefer to go with Brent and Fin.
As usual, TIMVP's comments is one of the few other things worth reading in this forum.. I think alike.. I don't think Pop is that hung up over this loss..
I think despite the loss, the game showed that if yo have to put one team slightly ahead of the other, it would be the Spurs. They controlled the game pretty well (on the road) before TD's ejection and Dallas looked hesitant at times.
Elson really challenged Dirk, particulary by choosing to let him some space on his left and blocking his right. Dirk looked uncomfortable 2 or 3 times and missed the lay-up.
Elson is the major difference with last year. It'll be interesting if they face in PO to see if Dirk can adjust.
Spurs didn't executed very well at the end, It was basically one on one. But I think it's partly because Pop didn't want to show the plays he could use in PO.
And also because it was a half-important half not so important game so I think players
really had the appropritate focus and intensity.
Vaughn indeed didn't looked able to defend Harris. Because of the injury ? I hope.
Tony on the contrary, looked very active on defense. He' starting to have some defense at udes that I havent' seenfrom him before, like really sticking to his man while he's following him, like bigger men do.
PS: I'm not the one who usually blame the refs but someone tells them they're not supposed to be star of the show. the less you see them, the less you talk about them the better they did their job. they're supposed to serve the game, not appropriate it.
JC should pay yesterday's attendance back for having stolen them a good ballgame.
NBC musn't be very happy either.
Little correction :
Good Stuff! I certainly felt the Spurs were on their way to winning Sunday until Duncan was tossed. I simply wanted to see if the Spurs had finally matured enough to impose their will on The Mavs. I saw signs of that through 3 quarters Sunday. I believe Pop has the mavs where he wants them.
You its funny when Duncan did get tossed I turned over to my wife and said POP is next, but it didn’t happen and it should have.
Could you explain what those pluses and minuses mean.
Further proof that Pop may have come around to sticking with TallBall against Dallas. From the opening tip until the 2:21 mark of the 3rd quarter (the point at which Duncan was subs uted out after his offensive foul), Pop had some combination of 2 of Duncan, Elson, Horry, and Oberto in the game. From the 2:21 mark of the 3rd through the 8:40 mark of the 4th, Pop played small ball. At the 8:40 mark of the 4th, Pop went back to Tall Ball until the 2:52 mark of the 4th.
For what it's worth, from the 2:52 mark to the end of the game, the Spurs were -7.
Overall, here's how the +/- as a unit look for yesterday's game:
Tall Ball for a total of 39:27 -- Spurs +4
Small Ball for a total of 8:33 -- Spurs -7
Does anybody know why Bonner didn't play at all? We needed some energy out there in the 4th.
I was wanting to see Bonner too. The Spurs needed a spark. He may have been able to give it to them
Nice analysis!
Two notes...
(1) Oberto seems to play well vs. the Mavs.
(2) Not much should be read into the Spurs rebounding advantage since Damp was out.
I also think that we need to stop relying so much on Manu in the 4th quarter to be the game saver. I noticed lately teams are starting to do a really good job of shutting him down and making him turn the ball over in the last few seconds or minutes. That turnover last night reminded me of the playoffs last year![]()
. Let's just hope he's playing well by playoffs.
Yeah, that's why I don't understand the cries that Pop went to small ball too much. He was playing the Mavs how we all hoped he would until Crawford got his feelings hurt.
After that happened and Parker and Manu could score because the lane was too clogged up, small ball actually made sense. With Elson throwing up air balls and Oberto not even looking to shoot his jumper, the Mavs had no reason not to send double and triple teams at the Spurs' guards.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)