Reply With Quote
Mavsfan1000....keep cracking buddy...you got owned that in the last volley of Kobe posts a few weeks back. It looks like you're back again.....have fun.
Mavsfan1000....keep cracking buddy...you got owned that in the last volley of Kobe posts a few weeks back. It looks like you're back again.....have fun.
Kobe averaged more tha Shaq in 2 of the 3 championship runs. Nice rolleyes covering the fact that you arent very wise in this conversation
Shaq 60% from the field. Kobe 45% from the field. Shaq plays inside-out. Kobe plays outside-in. I wonder which style is more proven to be effective? Shaq>Kobe. Shaq even took a Penny Hardaway team to the finals. lol
Oh yeah since everything is about point total smart guy.
SHOULD be the shortest thread.
Kobe has 3 rings. End of story.
Eveything is about shooting % according to you
smart guy
I'm not going to argue that Shaq was not the main catalyst....look at the original post and it's claim. It's just Kobe is most complete player in the NBA today, regardless of position. Does he need help, of course...but he's the best player in the NBA.
Oh yeah we should bring up rebounding, defense, and offensive flow. Shaq, Shaq, and Shaq.
Your right man, Shaq would have still won those 3 rings without Kobe.Oh yeah we should bring up rebounding, defense, and offensive flow. Shaq, Shaq, and Shaq.
Im sure Penny Hardaway would agree with you as well
Yea, assists a game, steals per game and free throw %, Kobe, Kobe Kobe, so ing whatOh yeah we should bring up rebounding, defense, and offensive flow. Shaq, Shaq, and Shaq.
What's this crap? Take any of the starters off that lakers team and there is a possibility they don't win a championship. What a garbage reply.
you gotta be a damn fool to think that all Kobe did was piggyback his way to three les.
I'm no Kobe fan, but without him those Lakers teams don't even sniff the Finals.
They survived losing Glen Rice fairly easily.
Its called sarcasm and how would you expect me to reply to garbage posts except with garbage posts.
Yeah and they gained Rick Fox and Devean George. Both solid defenders that could hit 3's. Take away Fisher though and the lakers probably don't win any championships.
Rebounding, Defense, and Offensive flow is much more important than assists, free throw percentage, and steals.Yea, assists a game, steals per game and free throw %, Kobe, Kobe Kobe, so ing what
aren't steals a part of defense?
aren't assists a part of offensive flow?
Yet, out of the 3, the only one you can prove is rebounding. The rest are your opinion
they had Fox and George for all 3 les, they never "gained" those two. And as great as Fisher was for them, his job could have been done by about 25 other backup level PG's in the league.
And Im sure that the almost 300 free throw shots he missed over the 3 year run didnt hurt the Lakers at all either
I was talking about overall defense and overall offense. Many Shaq's passes come out of a double team which they rotate off the first shooter and than another pass which eventually becomes an assist. That happens alot with inside-out big men. In that case that doesn't as an assist for Shaq but he was a big reason someone else got open.
Thanks for breaking down the basics of basketball John Wooden. Kobe locked up the opponents best 2 guards during those runs, pretty important job I would think as well
Bowen 27 Kobe 24.
Ummmm....ok?Bowen 27 Kobe 24.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions