Reply With Quote
He has 3 rings
I put my money on "YES".
He has 3 rings
BtoB...you must haven't watched the games...but I'll stop feeding the trolls.
This guy reminds me of Jonathan.
Shortest ing thread in history.
Shortest thread maybe but it had such potential.
I think its painfully obvious that Kobe has been nothing without Shaq and he has done nothing to prove that he's the kind of player that can make his surrounding squad any better. Kobe will never ever win another ring.
He will however be totally happy stockpiling stats which is all he ever really cared about in the first place.
I think Michael Jordan is the best player to never win a ring.
You are a moron. Kobe and Shaq were both instrumental in winning all 3 C'ships. Had those 2 knuckleheads been able to get along.......they would have won 1-2 more. Just b/c Shaq has won a le in the absence of kobe does NOT mean shiiit. Shaq was lucky the mavs wore panties and not jock straps during the finals or shaq would still be at 3 rings.
I can see how they got confused
*No mavs fans were hurt during the posting of this thread.
Last edited by Roxsfan; 04-16-2007 at 11:37 AM.
Is school out already?
Worst
Thread
Ever
Shaq winning another ring has tarnished Kobe's legacy beyond repair. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH IT.
Dwayne Wade won one ring while Shaq watched
true shaq only averaged like 9 points aganist the mavs
Shaq allowed Wade to dominate with his prescence alone. Otherwise Wade would see consistent double teams. Shaq did the same for Kobe.
I know, i was being sarcastic in response to this dumb ass post
no, Kobe raping a white girl did that.
but as far as basketball goes, Kobe was a big part of those three championships and earned every bit of those 3 rings.
You could say everyone on that team earned but the fact is this. All Shaq needs is a all-star shooting guard while Kobe needs one of the most dominant big man ever.
So one player needing an all star>than another player needing an all star?
Many holes in you logic
No because it is easier building a team around a big man than a shooting guard. Shaq's team was still winning even when Wade was out. The offense looks so easy when Shaq plays. Kobe makes everything look tough from an offensive perspective though he still makes shots but not in the benefit of his teams rhythm.
Bottom line is, Kobe will be one of the 50 greatest players ever, and Wade will be if he keeps playing like he has played his first couple of years. So basically, you could say that Shaq never won without a dominant sg that could draw double teams as well
2000 NBA Finals - Lakers vs. Pacers
Game 4 Shaq fouled out in OT. Kobe scored 8 points in OT and led the Lakers to a win.
Just one game, I know, but this is one of many occasions that prove that Kobe contributed plenty even without the help of Shaq. He didn't just "go along for the ride" as Shaq won 3 les (Phil Jackson is the one that did that, after getting 6 rings for watching Jordan dominate).
Guys...don't feed the trolls....also, Kobe is behind Garnett as the most effecient player this year...(based on NBA stats) Not bad for a chucker, who only cares about himself.
Sheesh..if the league had a PLAYOFF MVP, Kobe would have won more than Shaq. Yes Shaq was awesome in the Finals...but Kobe took Shaq to the Finals.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
