Reply With Quote
Sorry you aren't buying it. Feel free to check with Kori she knows who I am.
But who controls the media? JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZNo way, wake up sheeple.
A giant conspiracy is MUCH more plausible than some reporter f***ing up in the middle of a massive news event.
If you really want to cover things up, then be sure to tell a news organization what you are doing, so that they can report it the way you want to, because no one in news organizations EVER has spilled the beans about something.
Sorry you aren't buying it. Feel free to check with Kori she knows who I am.
Ok, I'll buy it.
Question: What's the need for having so many nicks?
actually I had stayed with DRM for along time since I never even bothered with the troll forum anymore. I recently started this account for personal reasons and dropped DRM.
Personal reasons?
Did DRM get in trouble with the law?
Doesn't exactly exclude "mouse."
Oh yeah, Who freakin' cares?
DRM is not in trouble with the law.
Yonivore no one ing cares. I was just pointing out that I am not mouse. Didn't want the confusion. That is all. If I was mouse I'd have made some kind of production about it.
Nice way to avoid the topic, seems like you and Chump dodge answering questions also.
WTC didn't have any damage since it feel before any of the towers. What damage are you talking about?
http://911research.wtc7.net/re911/welcome.html
A friend of mine, an engineer, had always listened patiently to my rants about the truth of 9/11. He prides himself on his cynicism, and he was always skeptical of the official line on 9/11, but he was never 100% convinced that I wasn't at least partly nutty. Then I showed him a video of WTC7 collapsing. He was astounded. He said "Play it again" about 5 times. He said, (I'm paraphrasing), "Look how perfectly vertically it fell down. That building was demolished by experts! You can't wire up the charges necessary to do that in only a few hours - in a building on fire!" Then it hit him. It seems to me that at some point in the very near future a critical mass of people will experience what my friend experienced. This gives one hope for the future of our country. The credit will go to you and sites like yours.
[quoteI] just read Jim Hoffman's article regarding the Popular Mechanics 911 article and I had to comment, not on the subject matter so much as regarding Popular Mechanics magazine. I bought the Sept. 2003 issue off the shelf at a store and thought it really odd that every entry in the table of contents was listed in black except for one: the one en led "Beyond Superpower". The referenced article on page 76 looks like a military recruitment brochure and reads like it came straight out of Bush's white house. This, in a magazine supposedly about workshop tools cars, etc. that targets lots of young men whose future prospects for work look bleak at best![/quote]
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html
Thank you for having the guts to bring this story to light. It is so painfully obvious that no cause has been identified regarding the implosion of WTC 7. It is only appropriate that I choose to no longer sing the last verse of our National Anthem. That phrase no longer applies to this society, save for few people like your group that can think outside of the CNN box.
Last edited by =RTM=; 04-24-2007 at 07:02 PM.
The BBC reporter stated the building collapsed while it was clearly visible behind her.
Aaron Brown did the exact same thing on American tv. He just had a producer that was well-enough informed or familiar with the building that Brown was able to correct himself within a minute or so.
So now the as yet to be released SpursTalk Omnibus 9/11 Conspiracy Theory includes the BBC and CNN organizations and more than likely the wire services that fed the networks the initial reports. Does this mean there will be another delay in its release? You could always release the second edition in a year or so.
Oh, you got us there. He talked to an engineer once. Impressive. Anecdotal conversations with engineers trump actual engineering calculations every time. I guess you win.
Son of a , how many of these stupid ass threads are you going to start? You're worse than Dan.
The difference is that mouse is just screwing around with people, while dan is desperately lying as an ideological crusade.
Huh? Are you suggesting that 7 WTC fell before either 1 WTC or 2 WTC?
Fired Mods do little for Kori's site. Maybe you wish you could delete them.
ROFLFired Mods do little for Kori's site. Maybe you wish you could delete them.
chump says nobody cares about building 7, and it happened 5 years ago
I said that there haven't been any real news to justify a new program dedicated to building 7. There certainly could be a conspiracy channel coming to digital cable at some point. Sounds like something you could get involved with.
whats funny is in the other thread these guys were posting like 40 youtube links, freds911debunker.com linksAdd 9-11 and the internet where anyone can make up and not have to be called on it, and BAM!
The nutters come out of the woodwork drooling over the prospect of a juicy new tragedy to take advantage of and make their paranoia seem mainstream and rational.Add 9-11 and the internet where anyone can make up and not have to be called on it, and BAM!
The nutters come out of the woodwork drooling over the prospect of a juicy new tragedy to take advantage of and make their paranoia seem mainstream and rational.
you said nobody cares because no one died
and several times that this happened 5 years ago
That is correct. There won't be a show about St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church either.
If other conspiracy theorists make claims that are later widely disbelieved even in the conspiracy theory community, then it's not that fellow conspiracy theorists are wrong, it's that it was sinister counter-intelligence trying to undermine the "9/11 truth movement" with claims so absurd that it compromises the efficacy of the whole. Seriously.
Any updates on this?
When NIST initiated the WTC investigation, it made a decision not to hire new staff to support the investigation. After the June 2004 progress report on the WTC investigation was issued, the NIST investigation team stopped working on WTC 7 and was assigned full-time through the fall of 2005 to complete the investigation of the WTC towers. With the release and dissemination of the report on the WTC towers in October 2005, the investigation of the WTC 7 collapse resumed. Considerable progress has been made since that time, including the review of nearly 80 boxes of new do ents related to WTC 7, the development of detailed technical approaches for modeling and analyzing various collapse hypotheses, and the selection of a contractor to assist NIST staff in carrying out the analyses. It is anticipated that a draft report will be released by early 2007.
The current NIST working collapse hypothesis for WTC 7 is described in the June 2004 Progress Report on the Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (Volume 1, page 17, as well as Appendix L), as follows:
An initial local failure occurred at the lower floors (below floor 13) of the building due to fire and/or debris-induced structural damage of a critical column (the initiating event) which supported a large-span floor bay with an area of about 2,000 square feet;
Vertical progression of the initial local failure occurred up to the east penthouse, and as the large floor bays became unable to redistribute the loads, it brought down the interior structure below the east penthouse; and
Triggered by damage due to the vertical failure, horizontal progression of the failure across the lower floors (in the region of floors 5 and 7 that were much thicker and more heavily reinforced than the rest of the floors) resulted in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure.
This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
