Bbc Was Half An Hour Too Early Reporting On Wtc7 Collapse

[The Power Hour]

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096



VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE
On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.

This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.

9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.

What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.

Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.

So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.

No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/video.htm

[01Snake]

Thats it. I'm a believer.

[smeagol]

Here we gooooooo agaaaaiiiiinnnnnnnnn . . .

[whottt]

The BBC is pro-terrorist...it wouldn't surprise that Al-Qaeda gave them a heads up....

[The Power Hour]

You two assahts have a problem with freedom of speech? take it up with our troops dying every day.

[boutons_]

WTC/Pentagon conspiracies will be going on for decades, just like the JFK assassination.

[=RTM=]

I notice a pattern in this forum, You have people who bring up good topics and post things they are curious about that could lead to really good debates and conversations and then you have the other group of people who do nothing but take cheap shots at them and bring nothing intelligent to the table, why is that?

[clambake]

How did the bbc know, and how did they find out?

[BacktoBasics]

I don't believe in the conspiracy but it really is a good point that is met with nothing but insults.

If you aren't buying it then why not give at least some reasoning behind it rather than ing and moaning.

[smeagol]

I don't believe in the conspiracy but it really is a good point that is met with nothing but insults.

If you aren't buying it then why not give at least some reasoning behind it rather than ing and moaning.

Your act is old.

[FromWayDowntown]

Curiously, American news outlets were reporting throughout the afternoon of 9/11 that Building 7 was on the verge of collapse and that it had been evacuated because it appeared that it was going to collapse at any minute.

Either someone in on the conspiracy tipped off the American media that 7 WTC was about to be demolished -- since those outlets were reporting its imminent failure -- or there was fairly significant evidence throughout that day to suggest that the structural damage that the building sustained that morning was going to eventually cause its collapse.

[BacktoBasics]

Your act is old.

What act? Are you going to ban me?

[smeagol]

What act? Are you going to ban me?

Old but sometimes it's still funny

[BacktoBasics]

Curiously, American news outlets were reporting throughout the afternoon of 9/11 that Building 7 was on the verge of collapse and that it had been evacuated because it appeared that it was going to collapse at any minute.

Either someone in on the conspiracy tipped off the American media that 7 WTC was about to be demolished -- since those outlets were reporting its imminent failure -- or there was fairly significant evidence throughout that day to suggest that the structural damage that the building sustained that morning was going to eventually cause its collapse.

interesting point but should we expect this obvious failure to inaccurately report the right info normal and excused and/or just reasoning for what happened.

[BacktoBasics]

Old but sometimes it's still funny

What in the are you talking about. I don't think you know who I am. I'm not your little buddy mouse. You got the wrong porn star buddy.

[Lebowski Brickowski]

Man when I saw that footage a couple of months ago, it gave me chills.

BBC's response was that they LOST the archive of the 9-11 footage. LOST THE FOOTAGE of the most significant event since Pearl Harbor. Nice work BBC.

[smeagol]

What in the are you talking about. I don't think you know who I am. I'm not your little buddy mouse. You got the wrong porn star buddy.

Sure . . .

[Mr. Peabody]

Either someone in on the conspiracy tipped off the American media that 7 WTC was about to be demolished -- since those outlets were reporting its imminent failure -- or there was fairly significant evidence throughout that day to suggest that the structural damage that the building sustained that morning was going to eventually cause its collapse.

Whenever I have to make a choice between two explanations for an event, I usually go with the explanation that is the simplest and most compatible with my life experience. In this case, it is obvious that someone from inside the conspiracy tipped off the American and British media. The Brits screwed up and reported too soon because they had trouble converting the time of collapse from American time to British time. This is why we need to formally adopt Universal Time for all future conspiracy planning.

[RandomGuy]

WTC/Pentagon conspiracies will be going on for decades, just like the JFK assassination.

Yuppers.

That was my second thought when this whole thing happened.

Up until now, all we really had was the JFK assassination.

Add 9-11 and the internet where anyone can make up and not have to be called on it, and BAM!

The nutters come out of the woodwork drooling over the prospect of a juicy new tragedy to take advantage of and make their paranoia seem mainstream and rational.

[BacktoBasics]

Sure . . .

I'm not mouse buddy. Previous screen names I've gone by are

Dirties Robbed Me
Bishopryan
Messican Lover
GiG's Doctor
and so on.....

I'm sorry you got it wrong.

I don't think missing originals is even close to a respectable answer. I mean come on thats worse than "the dog ate my homework".

[RandomGuy]

I notice a pattern in this forum, You have people who bring up good topics and post things they are curious about that could lead to really good debates and conversations and then you have the other group of people who do nothing but take cheap shots at them and bring nothing intelligent to the table, why is that?

NBAdan wrote:
you sheeple

RIP City said:
I wonder what dunker has to say now?
I hate to be the one to uncork your head from your ass
were did you get your education?

Power Hour said:
Please do me a favor and uncork your head before you reply

Did you fall off the crib in your trailer when you was reaching for that 1/2 empty can of Bush beer your pappy left after falling asleep while watching re runs of Dukes of Hazard?
Are you acting stupid

ask your MENSA Buddies when you golf with them this weekend

Deadbeat Dad wrote:
Why do you asshats keep telling everyone else
you puppets

RTM wrote:
From the #1 physic
If this man chowder drinking
You two assahts

(hint: anybody notice a theme in the language usage here?)

(Other than the fact that almost all of the statements were really written by one person that is)

[RandomGuy]

I notice a pattern in this forum, You have people who bring up good topics and post things they are curious about that could lead to really good debates and conversations and then you have the other group of people who do nothing but take cheap shots at them and bring nothing intelligent to the table, why is that?

I'm curious:

A moving body acclerated at 7 meters per second per second for 11 meters will have how much kinetic energy in relation to its mass?

[smeagol]

I'm not mouse buddy. Previous screen names I've gone by are

Dirties Robbed Me
Bishopryan
Messican Lover
GiG's Doctor
and so on.....

I'm sorry you got it wrong.

[Extra Stout]

interesting point but should we expect this obvious failure to inaccurately report the right info normal and excused and/or just reasoning for what happened.

Inaccuracy in breaking news during a crisis is not unusual.

[RandomGuy]

Inaccuracy in breaking news during a crisis is not unusual.

No way, wake up sheeple.

A giant conspiracy is MUCH more plausible than some reporter f***ing up in the middle of a massive news event.

If you really want to cover things up, then be sure to tell a news organization what you are doing, so that they can report it the way you want to, because no one in news organizations EVER has spilled the beans about something.