Reply With Quote
Obviously.
well if thats dirty I don't want to be clean
Obviously.
I don't think Mike Brown has to lobby for calls next game.
The Cavs got A LOT of beneficial calls in game 2. The Spurs committed more fouls and the Cavs got more free throws.
I was surprised that elbow to Manu's face didn't get called.
Yeah, the Cavs aren't likely to get more calls than they did last night.
He was owned.
Manu is an and-1 three-point specialist.
He got Wade on an and-1 three and made it, during the 04 Olympics.
I think Brown was doing it more to point it out to Gibson, not the refs.
It's irrelevant. Brown wants more calls, but the Cavs got more phantom foul calls in this game than I've seen in a while. Bavetta's crew dropped the ball in this one, but it didn't make a difference.
And that was obviously an example of another stupid post by you.
Mentioning the referee's influence on a game in a press conference is what losers do. you'll never hear pop, or any of the Spurs say anything about the officiating at a press conference. (except when Duncan was challenged to a fight by an official during a game, and even then Duncan and the Spurs didn't blame Crawford for the loss) Jerry Sloan never mentioned anything about the officials. He's been around long enough to know better. If the roles had been reversed, pop would have said "it was a great shot" period.
What really gets me is LeBron and co.'s iness even after the game 2 loss. "We been in dis situation befo aginst Detroit"
This ain't Detroit, fellas.
Good night, Spur fans try to find something to complain about in everything the opponent says.
[QUOTE=ancestron]Mentioning the referee's influence on a game in a press conference is what losers do. QUOTE]
I agree with most of your quote, but Phil Jackson does this every series. He is not a loser, but in fact the biggest winner in history!
Phil Jackson had Jordan and Shaq, so he doesnt count.
An example of every Chicago bulls timeout during their championship years--"give it to Michael!"
An example of every LA Lakers timeout during their championship years--
"get it in to Shaq!"
and where has he been the last five years without a player like them?
Change your favorite team to "Cleveland Cavaliers" right now, LeBron sympathizer. Witness your chosen one completely disappearing.
Last edited by ancestron; 06-12-2007 at 01:29 AM.
@ Shoog being a Cleveland sympathizer!
Dude's probably been a Spurs fan longer than you've been alive
I think it's hilarious nobody understands tlongII's sarcasm.
well wtf...why is it like " ugh Spurs fans all the same".
That's just like saying the only reason Popovich is a great coach is because he has Timmy, or like saying Red Auerbach is a great coach only because he had Bill Russell. So by your logic, Larry Brown must be a better coach than Pat Riley, because Brown won his championship without having one transcendent type of player.
dirt mcgirt owns ancestro
Nice
Woah Manu is amazing if he's able to trick guys into flying uncontrollably at him. How the did Brown get this job?
Gibson wasn't "flying uncontrollably" - at all. Gibson went straight to Manu's right side in an attempt to avoid contact. Manu did a good job of baiting him and was able to lean into a little contact. Watch the freaking replay with your homer glasses off for once. Heck, Manu was leaning to his right before Gibson even got there.
Boobie didn't have a chance...when Manu needs more magnets, Manu GETS more magnets!
After Doo-Doo Brown said that I went back and looked at the play over and over. What a ing scrub for saying that.
GO BACK TO THE ASSISTANT COACH RANKS ...Pop did NOT teach you that whining part! What a ...
i think that manu did lean to get the call, but it's not like the cavs didn't get a fair shake in the game. everybody does stuff like that, including the cavs. i've never heard brown complain about anderson varejao.
this is how I took it as well. we sure have some thin skinned Spurs' fans in here....sheeesh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions