http://www.sltrib.com/ci_6995563?source=rss
Ask the expert: Should AK come off the bench?
By Steve Luhm
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 09/25/2007 02:44:52 PM MDT
Posted: 1:53 PM- Question:
Would it be more beneficial for my favorite Jazz player -- Andrei Kirilenko -- to come off the bench? He would be the leader and primary weapon of the second team. He would obviously demand more minutes than the typical "second-stringier" but, in a Manu Ginobili-type of way, he would be able to take over games, get his shots and strengthen our bench by a huge amount. He would be the go-to guy in a lineup that would also include Hart/Price, Brewer/Almond, Collins/Fesenko and Millsap. Would Andrei mind doing something like that? I mean, he would be a shoe-in for the Sixth Man Award.
-- Cody, Salt Lake
Answer:
Bringing Kirilenko off the bench is an interesting idea, though I'm not sure he would be crazy about it, even if he continued getting 20-30 minutes a night.
I'm also convinced that if Kirilenko embraced his current jack-of-all-trades role on a team that includes outstanding scorers Deron Williams, Carlos Boozer and Memo Okur, he could be a huge factor as a six- or eight-point per game starter because of the variety of skills he possesses.
Scoring points does not necessarily translate into value to a team. Ask Mark Eaton. Or even John Stockton. I am convinced Stockton could have averaged 25 points a game, but it wasn't necessary for the Jazz to be successful.
Scoring points in relation to value to the team is something Kirilenko needs to understand for him to thrive in Utah -- at least while Williams, Boozer and Okur are his teammates and they stay healthy.