I'm sorry, but the reason it's called a "shooting foul" is that you have to actually SHOOT THE GODDAMN BALL.
Ref: *TWEET* Foul! Out on the side.
Player: I was shooting the ball.
Ref: Really? Where's the ball now?
Player: Right here in my hands.
Ref: I thought you said you were shooting the ball.
Player: Well, I was GONNA shoot it. I was running toward the basket and stuff. Doesn't that count?
Ref: Did you actually shoot the ball?
Player: Well, not actually. But I was GONNA.
Ref: *sigh* Do I really have to tell you?
Player: I'll take it out on the side.
IMO it was a good call. Even if it wasn't, in a season where they are making a point of cutting way down on contiuation calls it's not remotely surprising that they'd make that call, especially if the player doesn't have the sense to let go of the ball. The sense of en lement from the Mavericks just staggers me.
And I could have sworn that the three pointer was called by Violet Palmer, NOT Salvatore. I did actually watch the game. The Mavs were seething and never really got past it. They ed about that call during every timeout. I think it contributed to the hard fouls and AJ's ejection. Cuban really only has himself to blame for that loss; it's not surprising that he'd file a protest.