lol lmao the cowboys in the past decade, .000 in playoffs
peyton manning, .500 in playoffs, 2 AFC le games, 1 Super Bowl victory
![]()
That has nothing to do with it....so everyone who has an opinion about a team has to have their own rooting interest meet qualifiers?
Nothing matters but championships. That's what it's all bout.
And that's the NY Giants preceded by the Dallas Cowboys. What the Eagles did means nothing because they didn't win.
lol lmao the cowboys in the past decade, .000 in playoffs
peyton manning, .500 in playoffs, 2 AFC le games, 1 Super Bowl victory
![]()
100% agree! All that matters is championships.
Nothing else matters but winning the biggest prize.
How does 4 NFC championship appearances and a SB appearance with your best playoff recievers being Todd Pinkston and James Thrash mean that he is a decent QB that needs good players? You're ing insane. Until recently, with Brian Westbrook's breaking out as a top RB in the league, he has NEVER had a solid running game, and with the exception of TO, he has NEVER had a good recieving core. And he did nothing but dominate his division year after year.
McNabb is an amazing QB. I would love to see what he could have done with an offensive core consisting of guys like Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne. Or how about Chad Johnson and TJ Whosyourmamma? Torry Holt and Issac Bruce? T.O. alone, helped him pretty much dominate the NFC (even though he already had for several years prior without him)
You obviously are full of when saying you follow the Eagles closely.
Mcnabb deserves better wideouts. It is unfair with how much bs he gets. Westbrook is ing underrated and a badass. Not to mention what an unselfish player. That slide at the 1 in the cowboy game was something else.
Asante wil help them in the secondary, but if they do keep Sheppard, then thats easily the best group of DBs in the NFC. But if I were them i'd rather go with a proven reciever like Fitzgerald rather than some rookie who'll take a few seasons to fully develop.
Westbrook is ing amazing. I think he's a top 3 back in the game, behind only LT, and Peterson.
Yea, I think if they were smart, they would keep Sheppard, and find a different way to get Fitzgerald. They are in a position where they need to win a le now, before McNabb is too far out of his prime.
McNabb is the Yao of the NFL, if he can't stay healthy for an entire season then they can give up their Super Bowl dreams. If McNabb could stay healthy, they'd probably get back to the Super Bowl. I know the Giants just won the Super Bowl but the NFC is so lolz in the playoffs, they could easily win the conference and then cross their fingers they don't have to play NE/IND/SD in the Super Bowl.
But if Complainian is going to sit on the bench during playoff games, they might be able to beat the Chargers in the SB.
I'd say McNabb is more like Dirk. Fantastic and very versatile talent who has gotten to, but not been able to win the big one, and lost a couple that their teams should have won, bringing on considerable amounts of criticism, some deserved, but a lot of excessive and unfair criticism as well, considering the fact that they led a team quite far for several years with less help than all other stars that do win the big one get. I still believe that if T.O. was fully healthy, the Eagles would have won the superbowl (despite the fact that the Patriots had to cheat, and could still only win by 3 points)
I'm surprised Nickbroken hasn't crawled out from his rock to proclaim this the "greatest free-agent signing ever!"
Then again, he is still probably afraid of Melmart after he welched on their bet.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)